Change Your World-NOT your Body

Monday, October 26, 2015

Testosterone WILL Change Transgender Sexual Attaction

Testosterone might not make men out of lesbians (lesbians remain the majority of females transitioned)  who transition, but it will make them want to get fucked by men once they board the transgender train. Despite the huge number of lesbians who have previously transitioned from womyn-loving-womym to full blown trans females wanting either males or other trans females, Trans Trenders seem perplexed when their hardcore attraction to females suddenly changes once on testosterone. Many will settle with each other in a warped testosteroned lesbianism, but not before just as many will make themselves available to dick and dis/ease.

 
 
And as pop transgenderism has been working overtime selling itself to yesterdays hetero anorexics, bulimics and cutters, straight girls on T experience just the opposite attraction change:
Yet all the while mental/medical transgender proponents, transgender propagandists, pro trans politicians, transgender school policy makers and transgenders from all walks of life who've experienced this same abrupt shift in romantic/sexual attraction continue to shield/hide/deny and outright lie about this information to school officials/parents/partners and potential transitioners.

Just so there is NO confusion here CROSS SEX HORMONES IN HIGH DOSES OVER LENGTHY PERIODS OF TIME WILL CHANGE YOUR ROMANTIC AND SEXUAL ATTRACTION! 
  • Lesbians who transition will heterosexualize-(desire men).
  • Straight females who transition will homosexualize-(desire females).
These attraction changes occur because the brain of the transitioner through cross sex hormone treatment begins thinking it is the sex of the hormone being administered rather than the sex it biologically is. But cross sex hormones only change male/female characteristics, they do not affect sexuality. Therefore a female whose sexuality is that of a lesbian, once on high doses of the synthetic hormone testosterone, her brain will masculinize (function similar to males) but her sexuality (same sex attraction) will not change and so the lesbian trans female becomes a lesbian attracted to men.

dirt

Share:

112 comments:

  1. Prey the gay wasn't working so now they found drugs that actually do only instead of calling it the gay cure they claim it keeps you gay or expands your desires by actually getting you to have sex the heterosexual way unless you were straight which is a smaller minority they were willing to throw under the bus if it meant turning more gays straight in the process.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Sounds like you have found definitive proof with damning statistics. Good sleuthing, excellent pseudo-science!

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous 12:38, another catty Fail of a comment.
    Try to actually Read the following ok?..
    Dirt's post above consists of what is called STRONG ANECDOTAL EVIDENCE - Made even stronger by the FACT that there is a direct quote from a Trender at center of the piece, but quite frankly the webs are riddled with similar self disclosures, not to mention cock worshipping porn, disseminated from trans trenders. Uh, try to contain yourself from reading in that I am a porn hating feminist, I simply state that as a simple fact.
    Pseudo science is actually the great Sci fi Oz that is responsible for unfounded claims of the Gender Machine, and articles authored by its members and promoters , parroting made up terms without connection to reality, and a dysfunctional relationship with Truth.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Three cherry-picked quotes showing that a couple people's sexual orientations changed is strong evidence that most people's orientations change?

      Haha, by those standards I could prove anything at all.

      Delete
    2. Giant majority of female-to-male individuals identify as homosexual, therefore heterosexual. Those are not "three cherry-picked quotes".

      Delete
  4. Actually, Anon at 12:38, there is much documented evidence, both anecdotal and research-based, that cross-sex hormones often do indeed affect sexual attraction. As an example, this direct quote is from the official NHS website: "Once transition has been completed, it is possible for a trans man or woman to experience a change of sexual orientation. For example, a trans woman who was attracted to women before surgery may be attracted to men after surgery." (http://www.nhs.uk/Conditions/Gender-dysphoria/Pages/Treatment.aspx). So please take the time to read and inform yourself before making uninformed, snarky comments.

    ReplyDelete
  5. But if the point of convincing lesbians to transition is to "fix" them by making them appear to be men (as you have argued elsewhere), wouldn't making them attracted to men be counterproductive/unnecessary?

    ReplyDelete
  6. The poor darlings!

    When boys reach 13/14/15 years, they experience an enormous surge of androgens in their body, incuding but not limited to (as the lawyers say) testosterone. This makes them (us), among other things, universally horny: they want to "do things" with girls, farm animals, vacuum cleaners and, you should not be surprised to learn, other boys/men.

    Puberty is a whirlwind for boys. Women who choose to "become men" are, if they take heavy doses of T, throwing themselves into an accelerated version of that whirlwind. And as for girls (I consider myself old enough to permit myself the term) who have not yet finished their own female puberty, I beg them to pause and reconsider.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. You seem to underestimate the libido of a person on estrogen. Cherishing the image of the innocent, pure female, are we? Having been through both female and male puberty, I would say I was slightly hornier on testosterone, but the difference between estrogen and testosterone was no greater than between different points in my menstrual cycle, pre-T.

      Delete
  7. Whoa, Dirt, this one's a doozy. Anecdata, no true scotsman fallacy, you really went all out!

    You are aware that the actual statistics on trans men's sexual orientations contradict what you're saying, right? Of course you are! Dirt isn't going to let a little thing like truth get in the way of her crusade!

    ReplyDelete
  8. Though really. The prison created by the need to inject a synthetic hormone into ones body.

    ReplyDelete
  9. The change of orientation that Dirt has brought to discussion is Significant Enough To Be Notable.
    However, Anonymous 9:16, you mentioned statistics, yet don't post them. Please provide a researched and reviewed grid of statistics that overwhelms the significant enough to be notable evidence of altered orientation, that Dirt has gathered from trans own disclosures.
    You have the statistical data, right?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. A simple google search will get you that information. If you're too afraid of the truth to do even that, you will also assume anything I say is a lie.

      Delete
    2. So, googling is too hard? Thank you for proving my point. No sense in me trying to teach the willfully ignorant: better to show any lurkers just how intellectually dishonest you people really are.

      Delete
    3. "Forty percent of FTMs who had begun to transition reported a shift in sexual orientation; this shift was associated with testosterone use." from
      Arch Sex Behav. 2013 Apr Measures of clinical health among female-to-male transgender persons as a function of sexual orientation. Interviewed 605 FtMs.

      Delete
    4. Oooh, good choice. Looks like 60% did not.
      Also, did you see these bits?

      "Over half the sample (52 %) reported sexual attractions to both men and women"

      "Overall, FTMs ranged from normal to above average on all psychological measures."

      Hm. In all Dirt's theories, I've never seen one that addresses psychologically healthy bisexual ftms, who are apparently the majority.

      Delete
    5. I'm a first time poster, not Dirt. In looking at the abstract for this study that links testosterone use to a shift in sexual orientation, I was actually surprised that the numbers were so high. 40% unexpected change through the use of a medical intervention seems to be something worth looking at for the health of all children AND adults taking cross sex hormones. What other studies are out there that indicate that a substance can effectively change someone's sexual orientation? The call should be for more research on the impact of cross sex hormones on this and many issues. What are the long term impacts of cross sex hormones use in a biological body it was not intended for? How do parents and young adults make decisions about the use of T without these studies? As to the 'psychologically healthy bisexual ftms' - the abstract indicated that "FTMs attracted to both men and women reported more symptoms of anxiety than those attracted to men only". No further information can be gleaned about the degree of interference in functioning and emotional distress caused by this noted anxiety. But also worthy of further research. Thank you for bringing these 'bits' to our attention.

      Delete
    6. "I'm a first time poster, not Dirt."

      hahahaha... good try there, dirt!

      Delete
    7. Thanks for the compliment. Dirt is a lot bolder and braver than I am.

      Delete
    8. "What are the long term impacts of cross sex hormones use in a biological body it was not intended for?"

      You know what's really scary? Medications derived from WILLOW TREES. Obviously GOD did not intend them to be used by humans, or any other animal.

      "As to the 'psychologically healthy bisexual ftms' - the abstract indicated that "FTMs attracted to both men and women reported more symptoms of anxiety than those attracted to men only""

      "Overall, FTMs ranged from normal to above average on all psychological measures."

      Twist away, twisty, but it's right there in black and white.

      Delete
    9. Then why must everyone be so dainty with trans feelings?

      When I was coming out I remember a carload of young straight men screaming Dyke out of the windows and throwing a big coke cup at me - it sloshed at my feet as they passed. And my fist rose happily to the sky.

      Delete
    10. Many of the most potent drugs and poisons are synthesized per botanical origins - including insecticides.

      Delete
    11. Yes, "Overall, FTMs ranged from normal to above average on all psychological measures." AND "FTMs attracted to both men and women reported more symptoms of anxiety than those attracted to men only"". One group is all FTMs completing the survey, another is a subgroup with attraction to both men and women. for which the greater symptoms of anxiety were noted. Not twisting, just reading.

      Are you contesting that cross sex hormones would not naturally be present in the quantities they are being used to give transgendered individuals the secondary sex characteristics of the opposite sex? Without arguing the benefit of naturally occurring vs. synthetic, isn't it reasonable to want to know the long term effects of hormones that are not naturally occurring in one's body?

      Delete
    12. It has actually been stated by trenders that they dont care about the risks. They need that T.
      Note a similarity between that and other substance abuse.

      Delete
    13. Not caring about the risks seems like the ultimate self hatred, woman hating taking its toll on young women living in an unsafe world that values men and supports male privilege while denying women our right to live our talents and passions. Self hatred and self harm can be healed, but T isn't the answer.

      Delete
  10. Why do you make it sound horrific if one is attracted to men. It's good enough to say that a change of orientation is not desired. But to say that you will like to get "fucked" by men as if that is a bad thing, shows you have a hatred for men. Getting fucked isn't worse than fucking. You are biased.

    ReplyDelete
  11. It doesn't show a hatred for men Anonymous 9:45, to say one will like to get fucked by men.
    It says : You Will Like To Get Fucked By Men.

    The hyperbole of your reaction to that simple statement appears defensive.
    Like you are somehow uncomfortable or embarrassed that after all the posturing and practicing manly behavior in front of the mirror, you like to be Fucked By Actual Men.
    I don't think its bad, I just think its funny!

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Oh, of course Dirt doesn't believe this is a bad thing. Dirt doesn't believe any of the things she posts are bad! She posts them because she's just a big ol' trans ally who loves to highlight inspiring stories of young trans men and inform trans people about the interesting effects of HRT!

      Delete
    2. "Like you are somehow uncomfortable or embarrassed that after all the posturing and practicing manly behavior in front of the mirror, you like to be Fucked By Actual Men."

      Oh my god! Men who like to be fucked by men? What next, one-shouldered togas?

      Delete
    3. Its the posturing and forced mimicry that is being brought to attention.
      All the protestation about having a heterosexual yearning for dick discussed, is the counterpoint.
      If its not a problem, why the defensive commentary about it?
      I'm actually not referring to 10:27, who seems relaxed and good natured in above post. But if you are a genetic female you are not a homosexual man. You can call yourself that if you like but its a claim that has no province in any reality other than your own mental platform.

      Delete
  12. There is nothing irrational about contempt for the demographic that has made and continues to make every decision that has fucked over the very Planet we all live on, from a seat of power and greed.
    So go suck a dick then, you incredibly silly cartoon of a sell out.

    ReplyDelete
  13. I think your bias is showing. Women are indeed capable of being influenced by power and greed. Belle Gunness, Mary Ann Cotton, Queen Mary I of England, Isabella the Catholic of Castilla y Leon, Irma Ida Ilse Grese, Enriqueta Marti, Aileen Wuornos, Griselda Blanco, are all women who have 'fucked over the very planet we live on, from a seat of power and greed,' just to name a few.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I don't know why you're all so sensitive when it come to hatred against men. You're all women in denial and no amount of testosterone and operations will change that.

      Delete
  14. My Bias is Loud and Clear!

    And you can't tell the difference between The patriarchal system and the women, some you have mentioned, who have embraced its values wholeheartedly, because of the rewards of Death Culture.
    Oh and please put Margaret Thatcher on your list , and take Aileen off.

    She doesn't fit the paradigm you are trying to construct out of plastic forks.

    Hey next post about how men get raped by women too! Like that has some kind of ideological impact on the global rape culture of males.

    ReplyDelete
  15. Yes we are Biased - its right out in the open - No stealth here !

    FFS you trans are dense.

    ReplyDelete
  16. I think you just admitted that I'm right.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What, WOW!
      How did you ever figure we think patriarchy sux??!!

      Delete
    2. Actually, I wasn't sure you were capable of figuring anything out.
      Your reliance on acronyms, terrible spelling and random capitalization of words makes me wonder if you have a learning disability or are just mentally ill. No shame if you are either, it would just confirm my suspicions.

      Delete
    3. So ..12:10 are you Pre- Irony, as well?

      Delete
    4. Oh dear, I think you might be making up terms again. Just because you put a capital letter at the beginning of a word (you don't need to put a capital letter at the beginning of "irony" too! You are just hopeless, aren't you!) doesn't magically make it a new academic term. Look up post-ironic, won't you?

      Delete
    5. @ 1:02..In the words of Grace Slick, slightly personalized..

      Fuck You, I Do What I Want!

      Delete
    6. I seemed to have touched a nerve, eh?

      Delete
    7. Yes. You should be more respectful about triggering my Lower Casephoria.

      Delete
    8. Seems that I've already triggered it. Sorry, should have placed a 'trigger warning' for my oh-so-sensitive female friends.

      Delete
    9. 10/29, 12:10
      Read the post you replied to (10/28 7:59)
      Now read what you wrote...
      The premise of your address is completely off kilter. Do you realize that? And are you the one bouncing around this blog with inept claims about the reading comprehension of others?

      Delete
    10. I think you are assuming that all anons are the same. Faulty logic, but then again, I'm not surprised.

      Most people who come here get bored after a couple of replies. The content is stale and readers don't come to any new conclusions except for "dirt is an angry, repressed little terf." One can only gawk at a car accident for so long.

      Delete
    11. The query was of 10:25 PM was clearly in reference to a single reply as stated.

      Delete
    12. Uh oh - a typo was made in post above - get ready for more irrelevant kookiness!

      Delete
    13. I think you already have the irrelevant kookiness covered!

      Delete
  17. Oh no's. Is there man hatin' going on around here? And bias too? Next thing, you'll be saying that people can't change genders.

    ReplyDelete
  18. Re: Comprehension - and misfired projection of subtexts...
    There are Trenders that have read 11:06's post up there , that are pumping their fist in the air in a fuck yeah!

    I just know there is! LOL!!!!!!

    ReplyDelete
  19. Anonymous 1:02
    You seem boring and petty. Sometimes, using caps is just an informal way of applying a little Chi to the limited format of a keypad.
    "..make it a new academic term.." hahahaha! Go wash your appliances.

    ReplyDelete
  20. The insufferable nit picking about capital letters as framed in parentheses by the Grammar Queen, was overly wordy and destroyed the confluence her comment.

    Which read like someone dog paddling on an inner tube amongst dolphins.

    ReplyDelete
  21. "of "

    There. No need to pee on yourself now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. What, did I just get struck by a spineless jellyfish?

      Delete
    2. Jellyfish are myriad and all encompassing inhabitants of our planets oceans. They possess incredible features, like bioluminescence and complex, intergalactic morphologies. They are also one of Earth's original life forms. People who anthropocentrically use animals as casual insult icons miss out, though common for people to do so, it illustrates a deficit in sensibilities about our natural world.
      Jellyfish took you down, huh...

      Delete
    3. Actually, I would give more credit to a stromatolite than I would to a jellyfish. Look it up, Einstein.

      I'm glad that you can form (mostly) coherent sentences when given a dictionary, hours to do so, and endless wikipedia resources. Maybe there is a future in academics for you beyond high school.

      Better retake the SAT though, your scores are most likely not valid anymore (I hear you get 600 points as a minimum, so you won't have to tax your tiny little TERF neurons).

      Jellyfish also breed by spreading their sperm in large clouds and waiting until female jellyfish swim through them. Just a little food for thought that you missed while combing the wiki for jellyfish. I actually opened a book though and learned that fact. Do you know what a book looks like?

      Delete
    4. I worked as an aquatics caretaker in a living museum zoo setting. Presently for a living i train students to take water samples for an environmental non profit org. No big deal. But I know how to read adequately.

      Delete
    5. Then you, of all people, should know that jellyfish are far more interesting, intelligent, and complex creatures than you will ever be.

      Delete
  22. Caps add Chi? The c in chi isn't capitalized by rule. Rationalizer. So chi pee on yourself now.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. An interesting analogy this creates ; Your grammar obsession no more make you a writer, as your fervent desires make you a male.

      Delete
    2. Incorrect grammar and punctuation are a clear sign of mental illness. Dirt, I'd get yourself in for a checkup, ASAP. I also think you should be worried about your reading comprehension, it seems to be a bit lacking.

      https://www.healthplexus.net/files/content/2008/March/1102dementia.pdf
      http://www.medscape.com/viewarticle/573859_4

      Delete
    3. Anon from 9:17 AM. Straight to the point. Holy crap I haven't seen a roast so good in years. Damn accurate and I'm not sarcastic.

      Delete
  23. You're hanging to that inner tube for dear life, and its pathetic.
    Also, Dirt isn't the Cap Monger.
    I am.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Anyone with a high school education (so maybe this IS something you can do!) can analyze your writing style, Dirt. Good try there.

      Delete
    2. Your metaphors lack insight, perhaps you are projecting? Hang on to that inner tube for dear life, my TERF friend!

      Delete
    3. So what we are seeing here - hopefully from a teenaged mind, are lukewarm attempts of a gaslight tone that may or may not be conscious mimicry.
      If it isn't conscious, although a grasping nuisance, its telling, even fascinating from the perspective of how mimicry is such an integrated and unabashed value of trans culture.
      If it is purposeful, as mischief, it is of course forgivable in a very young and adamant person.

      Delete
    4. You tried to insult me by telling me to 'pee on myself.'

      The last time I thought bathroom related humor was funny was when I was in elementary school. You have the mentality of a kindergartener.

      I rescind my previous statement. It is an insult to 5 year old children everywhere.

      Delete
    5. At least I don't think its a triumph to urinate standing up, through some odd artifice you fantasize is a real man's penis. I "looked it up" and apparently you people piss on yourself regularly. So you practice pissing at home after you've received The Thing that keeps you awake at night until the Stellar Event of entering The Promised Land... A men's urinal. That's what you consider achieving a life goal.
      A men's urinal.

      Delete
    6. So, Grammar Trender, have you noticed how none of your comments have been deleted by Dirt? Don't you all complain that Dirt deletes all the astute, intelligent , wit whipping comments by "Transguys"?
      So either the myth about Dirt deleting posts is another trans lie, or your posts are being left to show the world, but most importantly other young women whom have been drawn to the precipice, but have the core awareness that something with the trans path isn't what it seems. Because those young women are right, and are perhaps reachable because of a moment of clarity YOU Grammar Trender, helped to foster.
      A perusal of your posts, and the posts if others creates a clear overview that becomes another piece of the mosaic that creates Clarity.
      Perhaps if you read over your posts yourself, you may have one too. I will not speculate about your mental health, as its a trite and useless act. Only you know if you have BPD. Or some other challenge. I only know that you have served an important purpose here, despite the protestations to come from you after reading this. Do continue.
      Your words are Gold.

      Delete
    7. Train wreck, anyone?

      Delete
  24. No its not Dirt. But whatever gets you through the night.

    ReplyDelete
  25. Do you understand that other people post comments besides Dirt? I know what I wrote but I cant leave my name because I live in an area with many trenders, I see them around, refusing to make eye contact, walking in little furtive clusters.
    However I also know that some of you are very sick, and have made threats to people like Dirt, and In not as brave as she.
    Perhaps I will be the only person besides Dirt that knows you are mistaken, it doesn't really matter as I don't need you to validate anything I write, do, or am.
    Try it sometimes, its nice.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Do *you* understand that there are several different "anons" here that oppose Dirt's ideology? Apparently not. Ah, the power of wishful thinking.

      Delete
  26. Yes, I know there are several different anons that are in opposition to this blog.
    I wish for nothing, including a penis.

    ReplyDelete
  27. Sooooo you think it's possible to no longer be a lesbian? Wow Jesus Dirt you have really gone off your rocker lately. Maybe these trans trenders are just "changing" because they're comfortable with their bodies now and not feeling "dysphoric." You can't "change" being gay. You're no better than ex-gay counselors.

    ReplyDelete
  28. Presenting critical review of the trans trend isn't remotely like systematic anti gay "therapy"
    Have you noticed no older trans or the few role models whom identify themselves as transmen, never post contention on Dirt's blog? If the dysphoria you speak of exists, it exists in a very small percentage of people. The booming numbers of girls wanting to be boys , sometimes over a span of a few months of exposure to YouTube and other its magical you can be a boy media, is self evident of factors other than "being born in the wrong body"
    Even the ftm icons see it. That is why they let the young trenders fend for themselves and say nothing. Because they themselves do not believe the veracity of mass exodus into the quest of becoming boys.
    There is something else going on that is not 'gender dysphoria'.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. > Have you noticed no older trans or the few role models whom identify themselves as transmen, never post contention on Dirt's blog?

      And just how do you know this? :D

      Delete
    2. If they are role models wouldn't they stand up and say I Am (fill blank - Porn Star, clothes designer, grown celebrity's adult child, cant think of any others)
      Also the comments have the defensive sophomoric flair of mediocre students in college. Just my opinion, though but you asked.

      Delete
    3. Of course to speak the truth of what they REALLY THINK of the veracity of the trans trend, and the influx of young females wanting to inject "T".. would irreparably alienate their consumer base.
      Strike when the $ iron is hot, because its not going to last for long.

      Delete
  29. "Women are indeed capable of being influenced by power and greed."

    Picking out a small handful of infamous women (as opposed to women have done great things, your sexism is showing) doesn't change the fact that it's MEN who have assumed authority and social dominance since before recorded history. It's MEN who continue to exclude women from political representation and power, and it's MEN who get off on hurting women and laugh about it.

    You use 10 women to demonize 3.5 million women who never had the political power men have always had. That's call sexism.

    ReplyDelete
  30. If indeed there is a verifiable neural hardwiring that is causing girls to want to be boys in unprecedented numbers, and its an authentic malady - what's the etiology?
    I've been immersed in the company of women all of my life, in full candor, and so have thousands of others, including workers in the therapeutic community that have been privy to every disclosure and issue imaginable and what once was extremely rare is now almost casual in its presentation. So if it isn't a cataclysm of cultural factors feeding off the energy of misappropriated angst, if it is a real, medical problem then it would be classified as epidemic, so what would be the cause? MTV changing its format in the mothers childbearing years? Snapple? Paternal use of Adidas? What?
    The only thing that stands out as a novel factor of input is the current velocity of media and its effect on the belief systems of forming minds. Its unknown territory and this trend is but one example of the fall out of its instant oz and id.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Saying that transgender people transitioning in large numbers is a logical fallacy.

      Delete
    2. How so? Please explain. Or did you come up with the term logical fallacy in your quest for definitions for terms used to describe some of your comments here?

      Delete
    3. Go to law school, gain some knowledge. Or read a children's book, because that is clearly all you are capable of understanding.

      https://bookofbadarguments.com/

      Delete
  31. Misogyny is now a ghost in new machines.

    ReplyDelete
  32. I appreciate your insights 12:14. Rather then engage in petty duels with angry ftm's, how many real conversations are occurring about the cause of epidemic trans grendering? When swept up in nasty dialogue, we don't get to the complicated heart of the matter. We're always told to be careful of the feels. And with feminists that silencing is key.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. That was the outer stratum in motive.
      And owning some of it on a personal level, I do.
      The delicate, politically correct folds of the Emperors new clothes. Making a choice not to defer, for me, it was the threats of fire, violence and remarks of vehement female loathing that I have read against feminists that was The Deal Breaker. It is not a high road, I realize. But the cloaks of rhetoric and catch word victim crowns will not stop my defiance. Sometimes it is necessary to walk and talk from rocky, jagged places, crunching eggshells. But it must be done mindfully, prudently and openly. Important your comment is 5:35, I hear you.

      Delete
    2. One of the things I resent is not being able to state my name with my views. I do not mind being mistaken for Dirt, who is very brave. If I were alone, I wouldn't care, but I worry for my partner and my small family of loved rescues. It is a quandary for me to state any view from an incomplete stance. Even if that view does not reflect my most socially acceptable or commendable expressions of it.

      Delete
    3. ...Said dirt's "alter." This is the blog of someone with dissociative identity disorder.

      Delete
    4. Sweetie you're incorrect.. Are you insisting you are telepathic? Because I have to disagree with that, because I know the truth.
      Do you see how that works? How insisting something that isn't true doesn't make it so. Stop and think for a moment - and maybe ask yourself why it is so important for you to believe only Dirt could have the views you can't accept anyone else having. You're ability to "analyze" the "style" of the posts you are attributing to Dirt is faulty. Ordinary logic would include the possibility of error, but knowing you are wrong, since I wrote them, really makes you appear foolish.

      Delete
    5. But you know what? If you want to "believe" in your Alter Theory - go right ahead. But you have no control over any one else 's factual knowledge. You are free to be wrong, in your own mind .

      Delete
    6. Your penchant for accusing other people of having various mental disorders is starting to form a telling pattern.

      Delete
    7. I knew it would be easy to get you to agree with me, honey. It isn't appropriate to accuse other people of having various mental disorders if you do not have the qualifications to do so. So why do you have an entire blog dedicated to this very subject? I suppose it would be appropriate to use my favorite expression here; "the pot calling the kettle black."

      Delete
    8. You've done it again! I wrote the comment you replied to - I don't have a blog, so I guess you think its Dirt again. Am I correct?
      Thanks for the compliment however, since DIRT ROCKS!

      Delete
    9. I'm glad you like yourself. Hopefully you have attained self-acceptance too.

      Delete
    10. Are you drinking?

      Delete
    11. Nope. Clearly, your mother was doing so while you were in vitro.

      Delete
    12. My mother didn't care for alcohol which of course you wouldn't know. She passed away in 2002 which you also wouldn't know. I miss her very much and your ignorance and blatant immaturity is noted.

      Delete
    13. Heart disease, even though she was tiny and ate like a bird.
      My mom was the coolest person I ever knew, though I only realized it much later in life. Neighbors , relatives and other kid's parents made catty comments about her letting me play with traditionally boys toys, paint my bike navy blue (like my dads truck) and never making me wear a dress. etc. I found out only in my 30s that she worried about how my life would be, because I was a lesbian, I would never grow up to be married and taken care of by a man. She saw it in me when I was just a pup. But she let me be myself, took me to karate, taped every drawing I ever drew or adventure I wrote on the fridge, every time I finished one. I was lucky, so lucky to tell her that I am happy the way I am and that she was the greatest mom. I was so lucky to get to tell her that.

      Delete
  33. We hear that the problem is being born in the wrong body. But many ftm's talk about the privilege gained presenting as a male...and that does sound like a frigging relief. But the cost to the physical body and emotional torture negates its value in the long run. Certainly for me. I've lived my life on the butch side of the spectrum, starting out as a tomboy, and I've done all right. There are those that don't accept, but hey, you've got to be your own light first.

    ReplyDelete
  34. @Anonymous October 31, 2015 at 2:20 AM

    Misogyny is now a ghost in new machines.

    I love this phrase......beautiful

    ReplyDelete
  35. The subject of this post is how injecting high doses of synthetic testosterone alters sexual attraction and behaviour, NOT questioning the identity of those who comment.

    I applaud those who took the monotonous task of correcting this frightened young lady, but please dont waste your time, she's clearly looking for attention and/or trying to disrupt these important truths about transition and the discussions evolved from them.

    And I cannot say this enough, so many of this blogs participants do me proud! Truth is not only eternal, it brings light to all those brave enough to think it, and burns through all those brave enough to speak it! Shine on!

    dirt

    ReplyDelete
  36. Great article Dirt! The shifting of the sexual drive has been frequently brought up by trans trenders themselves, amongst themselves it is minimized as a trivial effect.
    But synthetic Testosterone dosing on female physiology's other effects of organ damage and cancers will have unfortunately, a large field of cases to garner data as time frames of bioaccumulation inevitably make their consequences impossible to deny.
    It will be impossible to dole out those prescriptions as easily then, and my guess is that after a firestorm of ill founded trans protestation, the trend will wane sharply.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Where are the absolutes stated here? The fact that the heading doesn't say "a significant number" ? A succinct statement (common in headings of articles) that you are interpreting as an absolute claim of 100%.
    Why are trans so uncomfortable about the sexual shift to men? Like many trans topics, its fine when discussed amongst yourselves or even showcased in your porn, but bring it out into a venue that doesn't coddle the subject, or has critical review (which is allowed in this country - currently at least) and its seen as a breach of some secret you are uncomfortable having revealed.
    Oh and the word bias isnt frightening. If you can't handle the bias, don't read the blog. Simple.
    Why don't you find a men's blog to comment on?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. > Why are trans so uncomfortable about the sexual shift to men? Like many trans topics, its fine when discussed amongst yourselves or even showcased in your porn, but bring it out into a venue that doesn't coddle the subject, or has critical review (which is allowed in this country - currently at least) and its seen as a breach of some secret you are uncomfortable having revealed.

      That's an interesting way to put it. How about this: Dirt concocts some kind of ominous anti-gay conspiracy based on the fact that some people become more bisexual (which, in some cases, means becoming more gay) in response to hormones. People with first hand experience justifiably scoff at Dirt's conspiracy theory as absurd and illogical.

      Delete
    2. It is absurd and illogical to claim a female becomes More Gay Male. Please, read what you wrote.
      An interesting way to put it - you write, and then bounce away on a spaceship to Genderama.

      If you have contention with the statement posted at 3:20, what is it? Its always evade and divert, a tactic that may sometimes work with less intelligent individuals in fast talk spontaneous conversation, but is ineffective when captured in print.

      Delete
  38. You "identify" as men, so what's the obsession with what lesbians think?
    Shouldn't you be focusing on the acceptance of men? You covet everything male, even inject testosterone to induce various physical characteristics of males. Shouldn't you all be focusing on what men think of your identity?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. I'm not making a blog about lesbians, arguing that they're all men or some shit. Looks to me like Dirt's the one with the obsession. It's only natural that people will comment on a blog that's ABOUT them.

      Delete
  39. Well, the thing is, most trenders were lesbians before they decided they were men, and all of you are females, and feminists are involved with issues that involve females.
    But you ignore the question about focusing on men accepting you as men. Because you identify yourself as men, right?
    Why are you ignoring the question? Or did you block it out, magically - when you read it?

    ReplyDelete
  40. Women transition (FtM) to escape the pain of being a woman under the patriarchy. You can give me all the shit you want about feeling like you're in the "wrong" body, sorry I don't buy it. So when they transition (now identify as men) but start having sexual attractions to males, under their own identification that would make them gay men. And everyone knows that gay men are hated by straight men for a reason...because they're penetrated and therefore have the absolute shit status of women. So basically, once women transition to men and start fucking men, they're back to square one as far as raising their human value goes. Very sad.

    ReplyDelete

Copyright © The dirt from Dirt | Powered by Blogger
Design by SimpleWpThemes | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com | Distributed By Blogger Templates20