Change Your World-NOT your Body

Tuesday, October 20, 2015

Fact Sheet: Gender NonConforming-What it is!

The terms Transgender and Gender Non-Conforming have burgeoned seemingly intrinsically, but in truth couldnt be more extrinsic from one another. They are linked for various reason; to name GNCists for the purpose of corralling their non-conformist ways, transitioning GNC increases sales for both the psychiatric and medical community, but most importantly GNC are used by Transgender groups to legitimize transition as a solution to Gender Non-Conformists!

But what exactly IS Gender Non-Conforming? The current pro-trans consensus says Gender non-conformity "is behaving and appearing in ways that are considered atypical for one’s gender."

So if we use that definition as our guideline, who among us is Gender Non-Conforming?
  • ALL Lesbians, be they Butch/Femme/Lipstick/softball dyke/Andro/Granola/Tweener etc are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Females who do NOT partner with men are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL disabled women are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Black women are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Asian women are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Hispanic women are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female Scientists are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female Tomboys are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female Athletes are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female Doctors are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female mechanics are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Females who wear pants are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female soldiers are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female militants are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Feminists are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female politicians are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female Authorities are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female mathematicians are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female construction workers are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Females who have any job outside of the nuclear family are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female atheists are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female agnostics are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female Muslims are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Female Jews are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Females Hindus are Gender Non-Conforming! 
  • ALL Females who are white trash are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Females who sell their bodies or whose bodies are sold are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Females who arent virgins on their wedding night are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Females who are sluts are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Females who are fat are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Females who put women and children before men are Gender Non-Conforming!!
  • ALL Females who dare to utter the word "I" are Gender Non-Conforming!
  • ALL Females who have the courage to say "NO" are Gender Non-Conforming!
And I say NO! No to white patriarchy's slim hyper-feminine middle class size 0 Barbie notion of what female/woman is! I also say FUCK YOU!

dirt

Share:

22 comments:

  1. If you are born female and are too faceted, too unusual, too vivid, too wild, too intelligent, too strong to Conform , REFUSE.
    Try it. Hold on to yourself, your ways, your stride.
    You do not need to be simplified and denatured. You do not have to walk into a medical box only to be extruded into a narrow rudimentary form that is so less than who you are, as a human being, a human female, who defies definition.
    If there is any hate on this blog it is not towards any individual who has decided they must be transgendered, it is rage at what is being done to you, and where you have been led.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @anonymous from Oct 20, your statement is so extremely perfect! Couldn't have said it better myself!

      Delete
  2. @October 20, 2015 at 10:51 PM

    Well said....

    ReplyDelete
  3. The only people left off your list are middle class white women, unless they belong to one of the other categories. This is implicitly anti-white (racist). There's a lot of cant that "reverse racism doesn't exist," and intersectionality is a requirement for feminism, but I have to say, this anti-white bias is exactly one of the things that marginalizes feminism. Not all women want to belong to an anti-white, anti-middle class cult in order to be feminist.

    A lot of the women promoting the anti-white middle class point of view are out of control racists, and the white women who are the objects of their hate are too polite and intimidated to push back. I don't push back, either, because I don't like to fight, I just avoid those people, i.e., I no longer affiliate with so called feminists.

    I know you, Dirt, are not a hater, you are a kind, thoughtful person, but I do have to say what I see about your list, which is that it buys into the stereotype that unless a white middle class woman is apologetic about being born into her race and class, she is an enemy.

    I'm Jewish and lower middle class, definitely not gender conforming, so I'm on your list of the acceptable women, but I just think this way of slicing and dicing women based on skin color and family origin is damaging to the interests of women.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "white patriarchy's slim hyper-feminine middle class size 0 Barbie notion of what female/woman is"

      dirt

      Delete
    2. But why did you list so many races, but pointedly leave out "white," except for "white trash"? In effect, you have othered whiteness. Why?

      Delete
    3. "white patriarchy's slim hyper-feminine middle class size 0 Barbie notion of what female/woman is"

      dirt

      Delete
    4. Who's "whiteness"????Created, driven, bought and sold by who??? And for the purpose of what???

      dirt

      Delete
    5. One more thing, I'm confused by what you mean by "acceptable".

      Dirt

      Delete
    6. Me too. There was no connotation of "Acceptable Women"
      That perception of the article seems neurotic.

      Delete
    7. Woah, I'm actually going to have to agree with Dirt here. That's a new one.

      White women are not marginalized on the basis of their race. Duh. Leaving them out of a list of marginalized women isn't "othering them", it's realistically conveying the role they have in society.

      Delete
  4. I know this is probably not my space (as I am a heterosexual woman), but your blog gives me hope and I am so glad you are still here. I used to buy into the whole "trans" thing, it took so long for me to accept my reality and stop the internalized misogyny. It was a long trip, I even got to the point where I paid a lot of money to go to another country to a "gender doctor" for testosterone. And you know what - the whole time I would come back to your blog. Now I am so much happier. This trans thing is TOXIC and it reinforces the TOXIC gender binary. As long as it keeps going, girls will be put into that deadly box of self-hatred. We women must UPLIFT each other and make sure our daughters and sisters survive and thrive. Trans is misogyny.

    ReplyDelete
  5. ALL disabled women are Gender Non-Conforming!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Being gender non-conforming is an entirely different thing from being trans, you know. It's a term used to clarify that people who do these things are NOT necessarily trans (and if they are, their non-conformity would be the opposite of what you think: for instance, an ftm who wears women's earrings is being gender non-conforming).

    And yes, most people are non-conforming in some way, thank goodness, although only some types of non-conformity get commented on (and that is when we trans activists stand up and say "this is legitimate gender expression and they have a right to it" - is this something you disagree with?)

    ReplyDelete
  7. Yes being Trans is different than being gender nonconforming.. It is going through extremis measures to conform.

    Being gender nonconforming is a revolutionary act. Whereas being trans is swallowing the role pill and the dictates of archaically designed expectations, hook, line and sinker in unprecedented desperation.

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. Except that a lot of trans people do no such thing, and are indeed gender nonconforming in terms of their actual (not assigned) gender.

      When you see those trans people: a butch trans woman, or a feminine trans man - you folks accuse them of not being trans, don't you? I mean, isn't that Dirt's point with all her lovely trans boy collages? Sounds to me like you're the ones obsessed with traditional roles.

      Delete
    2. "Being gender nonconforming is a revolutionary act."

      I agree with this. However, being trans and gender nonconforming aren't mutually exclusive. Trans people are trying to address their own body dysphoria, which has fuck-all to do with gender roles.

      Delete
  8. Assigned gender. So I guess that means that Biology is transphobic. Everything directed by Magical Identity Words.

    ReplyDelete
  9. Those subscribing to "trans" ideology are painfully oblivious, as demonstrated by the responses here. It's really as if we're going by different definitions of the same terms. Only problem is that the term don't seem to be consistent on their side.
    @Anon 6:38pm: "Trans people are trying to address their own body dysphoria, which has fuck-all to do with gender roles."
    But gender is defined through gender roles, there is literally no other basis. Except either the magical thinking of "I am what I feel what I am, don't ask questions or I'll kill myself!!" (which is not a debate strategy deserving of respect, btw, and actually the very opposite of what's traditionally known as "manly," fyi), or putting personalities/characters into neat discrete boxes and calling them "points along the gender spectrum."
    So let's assume the dysphoria has nothing to do with gender. You're not transgender then, but transsexual. You're upset about your biology: results of puberty (or lack thereof), genitals, etc., correct? So, take the testosterone, deepen your voice. Get the surgery. Do what makes you feel comfortable.
    What makes you different from a "gender non-conforming" women that does these things? There are plenty out there.
    There's nothing different on a sexual basis.
    If you're transsexual, they're also transsexual by the same standards. If they're not, you're not. We have to choose one of these definitions. But how should we define "transsexual?"
    Looking closer at the word, "trans-sexual" implies you can cross over from one sex to another. Which is biologically not feasible. (Hey, I wish it were possible myself, that'd be so cool.)
    Given this, you guys need to understand that you are living on an unsustainable ideal.
    Btw, if you disagree with my terms, I'm pretty certain I'd be defined as trans by all mainstream definitions (I identify as a man internally, present traditionally as such, get called "sir" on a daily basis, have hormone-induced hair growth, etc., and I love all of it).
    One thing we don't have any say in is how nature works. And guess what, no one has ever chosen their sex. In my belief, since we didn't choose our sex, like other things we didn't choose, it should be pretty much whatever. Like eye color. Or, for example, date of birth; there should be no real reason to be so desperate to switch.
    Seems like people are desperate to switch when they shouldn't be, though. It's apparently a very big deal whether your ID card says "M" or "F." But why, exactly? Do you truly believe your biology determines your destiny?

    ReplyDelete

Copyright © The dirt from Dirt | Powered by Blogger
Design by SimpleWpThemes | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com | Distributed By Blogger Templates20