Change Your World-NOT your Body

Thursday, June 5, 2014

Transitioning Kids: Selective Abortion POST Birth

In the last several decades world population statistics estimate that between China and India alone approximately 200 million females are missing from the planet due to sex selective abortions. Before the technological advancement of ultra sounds made knowing the sex of a fetus possible, post birth abortions of female babies existed in varying forms of murder, slightly skewing male/female ratios. But with the advancement of the ultra sound, aborted female fetus's flourished and continue to sky rocket today, primarily in China and India but also in countries all over the world.

The simple yet not so simple reason for these horrifying statistics is misogyny-the systematic hatred of females that has proliferated under all patriarchal structures and is the prime requirement to maintain (hetero) male domination. Misogyny is also the foundation for homophobia. Homosexual nature/behaviours was/is viewed as a subversive act under patriarchy. The stereotypical gay male continues to be portrayed as effeminate/womanly and man loving and the stereotypical lesbian continues to be portrayed as mannish/aggressive and man hating. Both stereotypes threaten hetero patriarchy and both have long been punished and abused in all patriarchal societies. The hatred, punishment and criminalization of homosexuals/homosexual behaviour dates back to biblical times.

Gay and lesbians were among those confined to early mental asylums and later mental institutions receiving extreme forms of punishment and torture to alter or halt homosexual behaviour.
  
"At Atascadero State Hospital, doctors (I use that term loosely) were permitted under an obscure California law to commit those who practiced sodomy into the hospital. Once admitted, normal men and women were rendered mentally disabled through the torture of castration, lobotomies, forced chemical treatments and experimental treatments. The horrors experienced by hundreds are almost too hard to comprehend in America. 

The most notorious was a Dr. Walter J. Freeman who perfected the ice pick lobotomy. He jammed an ice pick through a homosexual's eyes into the brain and performed a primitive lobotomy. According to records, he treated over 4,000 patients this way around America and it is estimated that nearly 30% to 40% were homosexuals. He believed deeply this was the only way to cure homosexuality". 
But long before Freeman's ice pick, homosexuals were being diagnosed, decriminalized, medicalized and experimented on in effort to cure them of their same sex attractions.

"...noted German physician Karl Westphal (1833-1890), who in 1869 published an article describing the cases of an effeminate male and a masculine female with same-sex attraction. He called the condition "contrary sexual sensation" and claimed it was congenital. As such, he argued, it should come under psychiatric care rather then legal prosecution".


"Westphal's diagnosis was rendered into Italian by forensic expert Arrigo Tamassia as "inversion of the sexual instinct" (1878). The celebrated French neurologist Jean Martin Charcot (1825-1993) rendered it into French in 1882 as "inversion of the genital sense" in an article describing a variety of "sexual perversions" including inversion and fetishism".


It was in 1882 under Charcot that homosexuality and cross dressers/female fetishizers were first joined together by psychiatry and remain siamese twins in all forms of the DSM even today. It is this joining of male cross dressers/trans males with gays and lesbians in the late 1800s that cemented the gay and lesbian genocide future gay and lesbian children are facing now.

"The notion of sexual inversion continued to dominate medical thinking about homosexuality into the twentieth century as biomedical researchers employed the latest techniques to uncover its biological basis. Even before sex hormones were discovered, homosexuals were hypothesized to be neuro-endocrinological hermaphrodites. This was the preferred hypothesis of German sexologist Magnus Hirschfeld (1868-1935)". "Hirschfeld was also a pioneer in writing about transsexualism and transvestism". "Although Hirschfeld did not advocate attempts to cure homosexuality, he was impressed with the research of endocrinologist Eugen Steinach (1861-1944) on altering the sexual characteristics of rats through castration or testes implants".

As can be read here, Harry Benjamin the father of transgenderism as we know it was a disciple of Steinach, only Benjamin decided to experiment on human rats instead. Since homosexual behaviour could not be changed as it IS innate, Benjamin and similar doKtors decided to change the body to fit the brain to fit society's strict hetero behavioural gender codes.

Hetero males who become female fetishizers do not begin fetishizing womens clothing until they are around the age of puberty and so remain safe from being transitioned in early childhood. It is the gays and lesbians who challenge gender norms in early childhood that are the targets for childhood transition.

In the USA there are an estimated 314 million people. Were gay and lesbian children transitioned since mid 20th century here are some educated guesstimates on the number of gays and lesbians aborted post birth via transition:

Ten percent is often used as a guesstimate on how much of any given percent of the population is gay/lesbian. I'm going to use twelve percent for my figures as a more accurate guesstimate to account for those in the closet. Using that 12% tells us about 37.7 million people in the USA are gay/lesbian. Half of that, 18.8 million are gay and 18.8 million are lesbian. Guesstimating that at least 2% of the 18.8 million of gay males are effeminate and 3% of the 18.8 million lesbians are Butch/strongly tomboy. That 2% (380,000 gay males) and that 3% (560,000 lesbians) are those most likely to have been targeted and transitioned. NOT because they were born in the wrong body, BUT because their behaviour transgressed hetero patriarchal gender norms! Even if we low ball the most likely parents who would transition their child to homophobes to a mere 1%, that would still be 9,440‏ gays and lesbians that would have been transitioned to cure them of homosexual behaviour.

Until gays and lesbians can be identified pre birth, efforts to abort them must occur POST birth through recent legitimization of transitioning children. If we use similar math to the statistics above only using current birth rates, that is actually using births of children who may actually be affected by Post birth transition abortion this is what the numbers will look like:

3,952,841 births a year in the USA, 480,000 are gay, 240,000 are gay male, 4,800 at risk, 48 will be transitioned as children-240,000 are lesbian, 7,200 at risk, 72 will be transitioned as children‏.

The mental/medical community has a LONG history of trying to rid the world of gays and lesbians. We have been put into the worst mental asylums simply for falling in love, we have been hated, criminalized, tortured, mutilated, shamed, ostracized and carved into the notion's of what we should be. But none of that has been enough to eradicate us on large scales, until now. The 200 million missing females from China and India took decades to accumulate, but systematic abortive efforts ensured the femicide in those countries. A mere 120 gay and lesbian kids transitioned a year doesnt sound like a huge number. But neither did the first 120 aborted female fetuses that now number over 200 MILLION and growing!

Bear in mind, these number are ONLY from the US, children are being transitioned world wide.

dirt
 
Share:

8 comments:

  1. "The 200 million missing females from China and India took decades to accumulate, but systematic abortive efforts ensured the femicide in those countries."

    Dirt, Hvistendah says it's 163 million, but it could be more.

    "Science magazine correspondent Mara Hvistendahl was a college student in China when she first saw an elementary school classroom where boys seriously outnumbered girls. Returning to China as a journalist several years later, she set out to investigate how, exactly, an estimated 163 million females came to be missing from the Asia's population—in South Korea, Vietnam, and Georgia, as well as India and China. The compelling result is Unnatural Selection: Choosing Boys Over Girls, and the Consequences of a World Full of Men, a new book that both shows how Western organizations and scientists played a role in introducing sex selection to Asia and paints a bleak picture of societies where a dearth of women puts everyone at risk.

    http://www.motherjones.com/politics/2011/07/sex-selection-abortion-mara-hvistendahl

    "She has interviewed demographers and doctors from Paris to Mumbai. She spends a devastating chapter talking with Paul Ehrlich, the man who mainstreamed overpopulation hysteria in 1968 with "The Population Bomb"—and who still seems to think that getting rid of girls is a capital idea (in part because it will keep families from having more and more children until they get a boy). In another chapter she speaks with Geert Jan Olsder, an obscure Dutch mathematician who, by an accident of history, contributed to the formation of China's "One Child" policy when he met a Chinese scientist in 1975. Later she visits the Nanjing headquarters of the "Patriot Club," an organization of Chinese surplus men who plot war games and play at mock combat.

    Ms. Hvistendahl also dredges up plenty of unpleasant documents from Western actors like the Ford Foundation, the United Nations and Planned Parenthood, showing how they pushed sex-selective abortion as a means of controlling population growth. In 1976, for instance, the medical director of the International Planned Parenthood Federation, Malcom Potts, wrote that, when it came to developing nations, abortion was even better than birth control: "Early abortion is safe, effective, cheap and potentially the easiest method to administer."

    http://online.wsj.com/news/articles/SB10001424052702303657404576361691165631366

    ReplyDelete
  2. "Misogyny is also the foundation for homophobia. Homosexual nature/behaviours was/is viewed as a subversive act under patriarchy. The stereotypical gay male continues to be portrayed as effeminate/womanly and man loving and the stereotypical lesbian continues to be portrayed as mannish/aggressive and man hating. Both stereotypes threaten hetero patriarchy and both have long been punished and abused in all patriarchal societies. The hatred, punishment and criminalization of homosexuals/homosexual behaviour dates back to biblical times."

    True....

    ReplyDelete
  3. This is an interesting title, "Transitioning Kids: Selective Abortion POST birth"

    I never thought of it this way, but it does make sense. Five and six year old kids are being labeled "transgender" or "gender dysphoric".

    Think carefully about this. If a parent really wanted a boy and had a girl instead, what would prevent the parent from simply saying, "This five year old girl looks and acts too much like a boy". So, they intentionally start calling the five year old girl "he". Branding young children with labels opens the door for all sorts of abuse. Moreover, using the transgender label for five and six year old kids is tailored made for Munchausen by Proxy. It's like, "Oh, I have a special child - look at me". I can't wait to hit the t.v. talks shows with my special child. People should read what some people have said about the mother of Coy Mathis and how she seeks attention.

    ReplyDelete
  4. It's just sickening how "political correct" all these parents/friends/family are. I wonder how many people who support the parents really support them deep inside. If people say that they question the transgender kid and have doubts, they are transphobes and bigots. Many want to play nice and act like they support it.
    It's so wrong.

    What kid at age 5 or 6 can make such a lifechanging decision? What kid knows what it's all about?
    And when they in the proces and living as the opposite sex, what kid has the guts to say that they don't want it deep inside?
    Especially if the parents set up a whole media circus around them with all the attention.
    Kids wanna please the parents and after a while it becomes they're new comfortzone.
    It's so wrong!

    ReplyDelete
  5. Nice, use the buzz word "abortion" (even though it doesn't medically apply here) to get rightwing loonies to join your cause. And I'm sure they will LOVE you, until they find out you're actually a female and not a skinnyfat, white middle-aged man.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Nice, use the buzz word "abortion" (even though it doesn't medically apply here) to get rightwing loonies to join your cause. And I'm sure they will LOVE you, until they find out you're actually a female and not a skinnyfat, white middle-aged man.

    ReplyDelete
  7. @June 12, 2014 at 9:52 PM

    Sex selective abortion is a very serious subject. People should read Mara Hvistendahl's book.

    With the aid of an old technology invented in the 1960s, there are 163 million missing girls from India and China. This is roughly the same as the entire female population of U.S. There are about 300 million people in the U.S. and half the population is female. Imagine the entire female population of the U.S. disappearing. So, technology has been used to select sex, and we are waking up to the consequences.

    What does this have to do with "transitioning" children? Slapping labels of "gender dysphoria" on five and six year old kids is wide open for abuse. How can people prove that what the parents are saying about their five year old kids is accurate? Parents who just don't like certain gender-nonconforming behavior in their young children can always claim that the kid is "trans". Small children are very vulnerable to parental influence.

    No one can really change his or her sex, but socially we lose female identity when girls "transition" into boys. In a world in which 163 million girls weren't allowed to draw their first breath because they were aborted, what does it mean to further erode female identity?

    There is an excellent video called "The Gendercator". In the future, people who don't fit neatly into sex based stereotypes are forced to visit the "Gendercator". It's macho man for males and Barbie doll for girls. People who don't fit these labels are changed. This is a film way ahead of its time.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Interesting, though I wouldn't say that it is quite the same as sex-selective abortion. Forcing women to get abortions is as evil as forced birth and we all know men are dictating this.

    As for the "overpopulation hysteria" with 7 billion people and at least 9 billion people by 2050 it's not hysteria, it's reality (although aborting female fetuses isn't the solution). Eventually humans won't be able to artificially increase our carry capacity and we will have a crash.

    ReplyDelete

Copyright © The dirt from Dirt | Powered by Blogger
Design by SimpleWpThemes | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com | Distributed By Blogger Templates20