Change Your World-NOT your Body

Tuesday, June 17, 2014

Ryland Whittington-A Child USED and ABUSED

Meet the Whittington Team:

































I recently wrote about the three most prominent types of parents that transition/will seek to transition their children and why parents doing so ARE committing child abuse. The Whittington parents are the quintessential example of abusive parents. The Whittington parents easily classify as both A and C (hyper-liberal-political-correctness-at-any-cost parents/Munchausen syndrome by proxy parents). Based on even past behaviour against Ryland, the Whittington parents were clearly invested in the pathological attention whoring of Ryland as soon as they were able to strap her with a disability. Ryland (fortunately for them) was born hard of hearing/deaf, but rather than love and accept Ryland as simply a non hearing child who would learn to speak with one of the most unspoken languages in the US (ASL) they made a life altering choice for her (cochlear implants). 

They then, through websites such as this and videos such as this (make particular note of this video) whored Ryland out, pimping her to any hearing media outlet listening to what extraordinary parents they are for doing so! And before anyone pipes in with fixing their child is what good parents do malarkey, being deaf isnt indicative of being broken. Being deaf is merely a different way of interpreting the world and communicating that interpretation via a different language. As an aside, IF the Whittington parents were interested ONLY in correcting a defect, they would have done so and it remained within the family/friends unit. Instead they chose to SCREAM it to the hearing world WE FIXED OUR BROKEN CHILD, WE'RE FUCKING AWESOME PARENTS! 

One thing conspicuously absent from the copious websites/videos regarding Ryland's hearing issues is that there is no mention of her being a BOY trapped in a little girl body. Apparently the Whittington parents used up their Ryland as deaf to cochlear implanted child 15 minutes and had to quickly find something else (or invent) wrong with their daughter to replace it. Whether Ryland had the good sense to turn up her nose at the hyper girly girl pink everything her parents framed and smothered her in as if it were natural and her parents reacted with shame/fear or they simply jumped on the trans kid bandwagon making its current trans circuit. Either way it is a simple enough child's ABC/123 disorder to coach a diagnosis of (which clearly these parent have). No species is born trans, and Ryland is no exception. She wasnt/isnt even your garden variety tomboy parents/teachers and docKtors are all to ready to throw into the trans wood chipper and make proper pink/blue mulch of. The Whittington Real Estate website makes quite clear what Ryland is, a piece of property to be sold to highest bidder till the real estate market comes back from the recession. 

dirt

Share:

23 comments:

  1. as a deaf person, who uses asl to communicate, i've found most parents are too lazy to learn the language. they prefer finding the simplest solution. too many times that's surgery. my belief is that any surgery, which isn't life saving, should be left up to the individual.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Very well written, Dirt. You have excellent points.
    These parents harm their kid. She could just have lived as a girl and wear the clothes/haircut she likes. This whole circus is put up by the parents. If she's trapped in somewhere, it's that circus.
    I saw a video on Youtube with little Ryland holding a speech on a trans conference at age 6.
    Really???

    ReplyDelete
  3. This comment has been removed by the author.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Even if she decides to transition, the parents don't have the right to out her. Maybe she'd rather be stealth. Not only have they decided to change her sex, they've also decided to tell the world, so she'll never have privacy, regardless of whether she's a "man" or a woman.

    ReplyDelete
  5. OMG Kate, that's terrible!
    Imagine the shame when Ryland wants to be a girl again, how can she ever do so in this position? She's brainwashed for sure.
    And she wants to please the parents. Now she's really trapped.
    In a couple of years they'll start hormone blockers/therapy. I feel so sorry for this kid. :(

    ReplyDelete
  6. It's baffling to me, this insistence on the part of the transcult that even very young children *must* be transitioned.
    Before puberty, very little differentiates young girls and young boys. Many cultures barely adhere to any sex separation for children who are that young. Children that young are typically viewed as sexless/genderless.
    So why this insistence on changing pronouns and names for very young children? Does it really cause a 6-year-old that much distress to be "misgendered"? Just leave the kid alone to play with the toys she wants and wear the clothes she wants. Briefly, one of Angelina Jolie's and Brad Pitt's daughters wanted to identify as a boy and dress as a boy, and her parents humored her in this. By all appearances, she's since grown out of it and isn't considered "trans" by either of her parents.
    I find it supremely creepy that this couple is taking pretty normal gender experimentation/non-compliance to such absurd levels and pimping their daughter out for media attention. If this girl isn't genuinely trans, I feel so sorry for her. Even if she is, I still feel sorry for her. Her (his) transition ought to have been a private matter.

    ReplyDelete
  7. I don't think the parents ever wanted this to happen. At all.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Anonymous June 18, 2:03 PM
    « as a deaf person, who uses asl to communicate, i've found most parents are too lazy to learn the language. they prefer finding the simplest solution. too many times that's surgery. my belief is that any surgery, which isn't life saving, should be left up to the individual. »



    Of course, you're right, but go a bit easier on hearing people. ASL or any sign language is genuinely difficult for hearing people to master, and if you find one who's really fluent and idiomatic, you can lay a safe bet that at least one of her/his parents was Deaf. Also, parents of deaf children are often encouraged to learn, not ASL or BSL of LSE or whatever, but ridiculous and unworkable hybrids like "Signed English".

    I am very suspicious of cochlear implants. Technologically, they are impressive, and they may well have a place in helping those who become progressively deaf after infancy. But for profoundly deaf infants, I can't see them as other than an instrument of "hearing imperialism".

    Dirt, I don't want to hijack your blog in the cause of Deaf politics, but I think there are sufficient parallels. <3

    ReplyDelete
  9. Of course, you're right, but go a bit easier on hearing people. ASL or any sign language is genuinely difficult for hearing people to master, and if you find one who's really fluent and idiomatic, you can lay a safe bet that at least one of her/his parents was Deaf. Also, parents of deaf children are often encouraged to learn, not ASL or BSL of LSE or whatever, but ridiculous and unworkable hybrids like "Signed English".


    parents are encouraged to learn SEE, if at all. SEE = signed exact english. typically this means using a couple signs while speaking so the kid can read your lips with a couple signs thrown in. i believe this is better than not learning anything at all. and many times, parents ARE NOT encouraged to even learn that.

    ReplyDelete
  10. Your SEE is probably the same as what I (British) mean by "Signed English". The (good) aim is to help deaf kids learn English grammar. But it is not a language, and anyone who relied on it for communicarion would indeed be severly dis-abled.

    ReplyDelete
  11. Petie, The eradication of a group of peoples in the name of science/progress/conformity (to those not of the group) IS quite easy to draw between what has been happening in the Deaf Community and ours.

    dirt

    ReplyDelete
  12. "hyper liberal political correctness at any cost parents" just nails these twits. Liberals have lost all common sense and critical thinking. So many of them are just insufferable, clueless shitheads.

    ReplyDelete
  13. Blame liberalism, because you know how much conservatism has done for you guys.

    ReplyDelete
  14. This is child abuse.

    http://www.bustle.com/articles/26899-meet-ryland-whittington-our-young-transgender-hero

    "Ryland Whittington, who is now six years old, was assigned female at birth. Around the child’s first birthday, it was discovered that Ryland was deaf. They weren’t discouraged, however, and immediately began looking into cochlear implants. Ryland soon learned how to hear and speak. One of the child’s first sentences? “I am a boy.”

    http://www.bustle.com/articles/26899-meet-ryland-whittington-our-young-transgender-hero

    The child is six years old. I'm sure her first words were, “I am a boy.” The "diagnosis" of "gender dysphoria" in five and six year old kids is tailor made for munchausen by proxy. Attention seeking adults have "special" children that they get to parade in front of cameras. It's kind of like the mother of six year old "trans" kid Coy Mathis. On some blogs of mothers of triplets (Coy was one of triplets), the mother is described as loving attention. I mean really enjoying basking in the attention. She gave birth to her triplets in a kiddie pool in the living room. The other kids are autistic, and after poor Lilly was severely disabled, six year old Coy was suddenly a "girl".



    ReplyDelete
  15. Anon @ June 20, 2014 at 1:30 PM

    Conservatives with the horns and tails are quite easy to spot. Liberals between their camouflage and extended hands are a much more difficult enemy to see. The results of both however at our expense are nearly identical.

    And personally I would much rather deal with an enemy I can see and defend myself against rather than one who via a Trojan horse stabs me in the back.

    dirt

    ReplyDelete
  16. Hi, I'm a trans person who went off the hormones and is figuring out what to do with his life...but i found this from a fellow trans and it may be a bit off topic but i wanted to share it with this blog since i return to it time and again...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP3sBFDp9js

    ReplyDelete
  17. 'It's baffling to me, this insistence on the part of the transcult that even very young children *must* be transitioned.'

    The trans movement is run by and for the benefit of white male autogynophiles. They need 'trans kids' up out front to distract from the clearly sexual motive behind their own 'gender identities'.

    I believe trans activist Riki Wilkins has bluntly stated that the existence of trans kids will 'prove' to the public that heterosexual adult male transitioning is not driven by sexual fetishism, in spite of the MOUNTAINS of clinical (and, thanks to these guys' activities on the internet, anecdotal) evidence that it is.

    ReplyDelete
  18. @June 20, 2014 at 11:35 PM

    What kind of political movement uses five year old children to further their political agenda. I agree that they use children as trans poster kids. If trans activists have learned anything, it's how to work the media. Using children is a marketing tool.

    "The trans movement is run by and for the benefit of white male autogynophiles. They need 'trans kids' up out front to distract from the clearly sexual motive behind their own 'gender identities'.

    I believe trans activist Riki Wilkins has bluntly stated that the existence of trans kids will 'prove' to the public that heterosexual adult male transitioning is not driven by sexual fetishism, in spite of the MOUNTAINS of clinical (and, thanks to these guys' activities on the internet, anecdotal) evidence that it is."

    Unfortunately, there will always be naive attention seeking adults.

    ReplyDelete
  19. Blame liberalism, because you know how much conservatism has done for you guys.

    I'm neither liberal nor conservative and I believe most people are somewhere in between. I detest conservatives, especially their view on women's reproductive rights. As to liberals, some pretty liberal thinking people used to believe that lobotomies were useful procedures. When well intentioned and naive liberal mess things up, they really mess things up. I'm not blaming all liberals, but this issue of "transitioning" (GnRH agonists and cross gender hormones etc.) has ethical implications. How can any rational person not see that it's wide open for abuse.

    I agree with this statement,

    Conservatives with the horns and tails are quite easy to spot. Liberals between their camouflage and extended hands are a much more difficult enemy to see. The results of both however at our expense are nearly identical.

    And personally I would much rather deal with an enemy I can see and defend myself against rather than one who via a Trojan horse stabs me in the back.








    ReplyDelete
  20. Hi, I'm a trans person who went off the hormones and is figuring out what to do with his life...but i found this from a fellow trans and it may be a bit off topic but i wanted to share it with this blog since i return to it time and again...

    http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HP3sBFDp9js


    Hi there! I've seen your video's before. You're smart and you did a good thing by stopping testosterone.
    I thought that you know how it all works and what's going on, but you still identify as male? I hoped you wouldn't.
    I hope you find peace and yourself. And happiness too. ;)

    ReplyDelete
  21. If no species is born trans, then no species is born gay. PERIOD. Your argument is invalid.

    ReplyDelete
  22. The video has the parents talk about how they learned about trans issues and statistics. Here's something they seem to have missed:

    "Feelings of gender dysphoria persisted into adolescence in only
    39 out of 246 of the children (15.8%) who were investigated in a number of prospective follow-up
    studies (Bakwin, 1968; Davenport, 1986; Drummond, Bradley, Peterson-Badali & Zucker, 2008;
    Green, 1987; Kosky, 1987; Lebovitz, 1972; Money & Ruso, 1979; Wallien & Cohen-Kettenis,
    2008; Zucker & Bradley, 1995; Zuger, 1984). Although the persistence rates differed between the
    various studies (2% to 27%), the results unequivocally showed that the gender dysphoria remitted
    after puberty in the vast majority of children"

    from this article: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21216800

    Sorry, it's behind a pay wall. But the fact that most kids grow out of it is well known in the field.

    Labeling your kid trans because they say they want to be a boy or a girl is NOT supported by the science. Gender dysphoria in kids is a strong predictor of being gay and a weak predictor of being trans.

    ReplyDelete
  23. The number of people/websites praising this monstrous couple for altering their child for the sake of fame is alarming. Their only concern is for themselves, and not the well-being of their child. Try to point this out on any of those websites and the mob charges with their torches and pitchforks.

    ReplyDelete

Copyright © The dirt from Dirt | Powered by Blogger
Design by SimpleWpThemes | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com | Distributed By Blogger Templates20