Change Your World-NOT your Body

Sunday, June 23, 2013

Trans Trending-Who is Transitioning


diggabum-Age 20

Marcus-Age (young teen)

James-Age 16

Christa-Age (young teen)

adventuresofren-Age 18

MrDallyWally-Age 15

llamaaaaas-Age 18

Liam-Age (teen)

There is a common narrative that runs clean through pre hormonal transition videos. A narrative that reads LIFE BEGINS AT T. There is also a common narrative that runs through post hormonal transition videos, that reads THE WORLD IS NOW MY OYSTER. What "gender specialists" and "trans doKtors" fail to realize or bother to realize is that female transition is much more about authorship/agency than feeling "wrong" in the right body.

The possibility of transition is the possibility of pen/penis in hand, and transition firmly puts the pen/penis in hand with unlimited paper on which to write or author ones self. Or rather a self that has up to that point been quieted/calmed/stunted/silenced because of her very sex. Through the hope of transition these young women dream of writing themselves, of making themselves the subject rather than the object. There is a God quality in authorship, even authoring ones own life, and only men are gods.

Through a mannish guise they can do anything, be anything, but importantly finally EXIST! Even if that existence is through artifice. They are desperate to be heard and more desperate to be SEEN! To author experiences that as women was or they believed was, forbidden them. These are women who 50 years ago had the choice between passive Jane Eyre or mad Bertha Mason. Today that choice has narrowed to some kardashian or other or death. Sadly choosing to write themselves through a masculine pretense, they unknowingly choose a living death. The core female soul they side by side work with society to hide and silence is today's Bertha Mason. Except instead of being the mad woman in the attic, she is the sad, frightened, tranquillised victim of an anti feminist hyper feminine pornography pit, trapped just like Bertha behind her Master's walls.

dirt

Share:

45 comments:

  1. Comparable to "losing weight" where women are convinced that a whole new person is inside them, and life will change for the better when thinness is achieved.

    ReplyDelete
  2. This is illegal. Posting information about these minors (under 18) on the internet where anybody can see it and putting their life at risk.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Anonymous said...
    This is illegal. Posting information about these minors (under 18) on the internet where anybody can see it and putting their life at risk.


    Please cut the drama.
    These youngsters exposed themselves to the Internet on YouTube. They WANT us to notice them, it's their goal that many people see them.

    Big

    ReplyDelete
  4. I just watched one of those video's and she worries about the 6 months therapy before getting T. Another F2T comments by saying: "they have online gender therapists."

    Now I'm sure.
    The world has gone crazy. :(

    ReplyDelete
  5. This is illegal. Posting information about these minors (under 18) on the internet where anybody can see it and putting their life at risk.


    Do their parents know that they make these youtube videos? Perhaps they shouldn't be making the videos in the first place. This obviously would prevent anyone from seeing them.

    Many of these female minors are already binding their breasts, or talking about it. Do the parents know this is happening? There are transgender websites that give away free used binders to women under the age of 21. This should be illegal. This blog has discussed this issue before. Breast binding for long periods of time can mis-align the rib cage and cause other health problems. Adolescent skeletons, joints, tendons, and internal organs are developing, so why does the female body need to be constricted?

    "As long as you were 21 or under when you applied, you will remain on our waiting list until you receive a binder. We do not ask for birthday on our application - only your age at the time of applying. "

    http://www.inabind.transactiveonline.org/faqs.php

    Since we are on the subject of what should and shouldn't be illegal, puberty suppressing drugs for 13 and 14 year old children should be illegal.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Please cut the drama. These youngsters exposed themselves to the Internet on YouTube. They WANT us to notice them, it's their goal that many people see them.

    It definitely is true that they want to be noticed.

    I went to google and typed in "FTM and videos" and got:

    About 4,100,000 results (0.21 seconds)

    Pre-"T", one month on "T", six months on "T", FTM Intro, FTM "top surgery", some dating and FTM porn sites, etc. PLASTIC SURGEONS ADVERTISE ONLINE.

    At youtube, I typed in FTM and got
    about 221,000 results.

    It makes sense to assume that gullible teenagers would run across these online videos.

    THEY WANT TO BE SEEN, AND THEN PEOPLE HAVE THE AUDACITY TO SAY, "WELL, DON'T SHOW THE TEENAGERS," EVEN THOUGH THE TEENAGERS ARE ALSO MAKING VIDEOS.



    ReplyDelete
  7. This is illegal. Posting information about these minors (under 18) on the internet where anybody can see it and putting their life at risk.

    Yes, somethings should be illegal. It should be illegal to promote "T" testosterone, breast binders, "top surgery", "bottom surgery", puberty suppressing drugs, etc.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Right on, Anonymous! Anything else you want to see made "illegal" that you personally don't agree with or can't wrap your head around? I await your list with baited breath!

    ReplyDelete
  9. Hi Dirt and guests,

    Sorry if this doesn't quit fit this post, but I just came across this story on Yahoo and thought I'd share it here.

    http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/transgender-girl-wins-right-to-use-bathroom-at-public-school-183951487.html

    ReplyDelete
  10. To 'avid reader,'
    I personally am of the belief that any adult should be allowed to do whatever they like, even if that means injecting whatever hormones they want and having assorted things installed on their bodies to make believe they're whatever. I just don't think the rest of society has to be required to play along with their delusions, and that the T being added to LGB makes no sense at all.

    ReplyDelete
  11. http://shine.yahoo.com/parenting/transgender-girl-wins-right-to-use-bathroom-at-public-school-183951487.html

    Yes, we know about this BOY USING THE GIRL'S RESTROOM. This is just another one reason why the politicians who support this WILL be voted out of office. Voters in other parts of the country such as Arizon have different ideas.

    THIS IS A POLITICAL TRAIN WRECK WAITING TO HAPPEN AND POLITICIANS WHO SUPPORT THIS WILL BE BOOTED FROM OFFICE. However, I have to admit that the transgender community was very successful in using this six year old boy for their political agenda. Using a child this age was good a marketing technique because who doesn't love a sweet looking kid. I don't fault the poor boy because he is a pawn in all of this. He is a cute kid. Anyone can doll up a 6year old boy, putting him in a dress, letting his hair grow out, and it looks cute and adorable. IT'S NOT GOING TO BE SO CUTE AND ADORABLE WHEN HE STARTS JUNIOR HIGH. WHAT MOTHER WANTS HER DAUGHTER USING THE SAME RESTROOM AS A 14 OR 15 YEAR OLD BOY. Gee, little Coy is now getting erections under the dress. The adorable 6 year old boy is suddenly 16 having a raging erection and he is sitting in the bathroom stall next to YOUR TEENAGE DAUGHTER. Bless the male sex and males can be wonderful, but MOTHERS AND EVEN TEACHERS KNOW HOW TEENAGE BOYS ARE. When he hits puberty, I wonder if he is going to masterbate in the girl's restroom? Of course, teenage boys never do this, and they never think about sex either. WHAT HAPPENS IF COY DISCOVERS HE LIKES GIRLS? WHAT HAPPENS IF THIS 6 YEAR OLD CHILD NO LONGER THINKS HE IS A GIRL, OR QUESTIONS WHAT IS BEING DONE TO HIM? I actually feel sorry for this poor boy because I'm NOT THE ONLY PERSON WHO THINKS THIS BORDERS ON CHILD ABUSE. Again, kudos to the transgnder community for using this 6 year old boy as their pawn.

    So, please, by all means gloat, BUT THIS IS SO FUNDAMENTALLY UNFAIR TO THE GIRLS, AND IT SMACKS OF CHILD ABUSE.

    ReplyDelete
  12. According to the following blog, Coy was one of triplets born in a kiddie pool in the living room...intentionally...no accident...

    ...poor child...no wonder he is messed up...

    One of the triplets is severely disabled from what I gather was RSV contracted after birth.

    http://fourtimesthefun.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-one-where-i-weigh-in-on.html

    "If you haven't seen the news today, the world is all a flutter about the 6 year old, transgendered, triplet boy, who identifies with being a girl instead of a boy, and was denied access to the first grade girls' bathroom, so mom is filing a lawsuit against the school district

    I'm going to weigh in on this, because I've "known" this mom online for six years and I've got some perspective on this story, given the background information I am privy to.

    My opinion, based on my knowledge, is the mom of this child is a fame-seeking attention whore, who will stop at nothing to prove how edgy and non-mainstream she is, even at the expense of her child's privacy. I "met" her online six years ago when she came to the Triplet Connection and made a huge ruckus because she was dead-set on homebirthing her "natural" triplets in a kiddie pool in her living room. I thought she was a faker, so I immediately set out to see if she was real, or not, where I discovered that she didn't, in fact, have "natural" triplets. She had ordered clomid from Mexico, and gotten pregnant using non-prescribed fertility drugs. Here's her post about that. It's still public all these years later. Her name is Kathryn.

    So that was my first encounter with her. She did actually successfully homebirth her natural children in her living room in a kiddie pool and she became a sensation in the Birthing Communities and Natural Parenting communities.

    When her children were 3 months old, they contracted RSV. I'll let this commenter on CNN explain what happened next. (MUST READ)

    I was actually following the live blogging at the time and needless to say, I was heartbroken.

    She then became well-known for having a special needs child and had/has a very large following. Then I lost track of her, until all of sudden she popped up in my radar two months ago when it was brought to my attention that her son was now a girl and she was going to sue the school district. I said two months ago, "Mark my words, she'll be on national TV."

    And sure enough, here she is, on national TV. How did I know this? Because she must be the center of attention and remain non-mainstream and make sure she's edgy and understanding. It's the way she works. Is her kid actually transgendered? Who knows at that age. Time will tell.

    Here's the one thing I can say with 100 percent accuracy... if your parents take you on national television at six years old and make you a public spectacle before the ENTIRE WORLD, you will likely need therapy in the future, regardless if you are a boy or girl. Guaranteed. I'm not even going to argue about the validity of the claim because once you take a private family matter public, you are not doing it for the best interest of your family. You are doing it for yourself because you want 1. Money, 2. Fame, 3. Attention.

    If this ends up being a documentary or reality television show, you heard it here first. "


    ReplyDelete
  13. Before he was transgender and "she" at age 6, Coy was a 'neuro-typical child' who dressed like a boy. What does 'neuro-typical child' mean ? Does this mean that he doesn't have any disability that is apparent?

    "Welcome Kathryn! First off, why don’t you tell us a little about you and your family.

    I am a mom of 4 amazing, wonderful, awesome children (and one on the way!). Dakota is 5 1/2 years old and has Autism. Coy, Max, and Lily are 3 1/2 year old triplets. Coy is our special little neuro-typical child. Max is also on the Autism spectrum. Lily had a very bad brain injury as a 4 month old and is about like having a 1-2 month old baby, but is so much fun (and feisty!). I work full time at home as Lily’s nurse as well as being a professional photographer outside the home. My husband, Jeremy, is a full time student at two colleges and should be done with school in Spring 2012."

    http://visionarymom.com/an-interview-with-kathryn-mathis/#sthash.24P7b1iw.dpuf

    ReplyDelete
  14. "Colorado officials say a suburban Colorado Springs school district discriminated against a 6-year-old transgender girl by preventing her from using the girls' bathroom, in what advocates described as the first such ruling in the next frontier in civil rights."

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/coy-mathis_n_3488306.html?ir=Gay+Voices


    (1.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL RIGHTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS WILL BE EXPOSING THE EUGENICS OF GENDER NON-CONFORMING CHILDREN, MANY WHOM WOULD HAVE GROWN UP GAY AND LESBIAN IF THEY WEREN'T SURGICALLY ALTERED. SEX REASSIGNMENT SURGERY IS BEING USED TO ERASE HOMOSEXUALITY IN IRAN, AND IN WESTERN COUNTRIES WE ARE JUST MORE SUBTLE ABOUT IT WITH PUBERTY SUPPRESSING DRUGS STARTING AT AGE 12 OR 13. DON'T TELL ME THAT THERE AREN'T ETHICAL ISSUES RELATED TO INTENTIONALLY DEALYING PUBERTY IN CHILDREN BECAUSE OF WHAT AMOUNTS TO A PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS WHICH IS LARGELY CULTURALLY BASED TO BEGIN WITH. PERHAPS THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL RIGHTS WILL BE ADULTS WHO SUE THEIR PARENTS AND PHYSICIANS BECAUSE THEY WERE STERILIZED. IF CROSS GENDER HORMONES ARE GIVEN AFTER PUBERTY SUPPRESSING DRUGS, FERTILITY CAN BE COMPROMISED. THIS IS THE STERILIZATION AND EUGENICS OF CHILDREN WHO DON'T FIT NEATLY INTO SEX BASED GENDER ROLES.

    ReplyDelete
  15. THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS continued

    "The transgendering of children: Gender eugenics"

    Women's Studies International Forum
    Volume 35, Issue 5, September–October 2012

    "One significant connection between the heyday of eugenics and the transgendering of children today is that lesbians and gay men form a constituency that is targeted by both practices. The grim details of the control and punishment of lesbians and gay men by the scientists of sex throughout most of the twentieth century was laid out in the earliest, gay liberation-inspired, history of lesbians and gay men in the US, Jonathan Katz's Gay American History (1976). This history is important because the carrying out of sexual surgeries on lesbians and gay men is common to both the early period and to the transgenderism of the present. Katz writes that, “Lesbians and Gay men have long been subjected to a varied, often horrifying list of ‘cures’ at the hands of psychiatric-psychological professionals, treatments usually aimed at asexualization or heterosexual reorientation" (Katz, 1976, p. 197). These treatments, which went on well into the second half of the twentieth century, included surgeries such as castration, hysterectomy, and vasectomy. Women were subjected in the nineteenth century to surgical removal of the ovaries and of the clitoris, a treatment designed as a “cure” for various forms of what was called female “erotomania”, and included lesbianism. Lobotomy was performed as late as the 1950s. A range of drug therapies were also used such as the administration of hormones, LSD, sexual stimulants, and sexual depressants, alongside other treatments such as hypnosis and electric and chemical shock treatment, and aversion therapy (Katz, 1976, p.197). Katz comments that the homosexual victims of sexual surgeries were sometimes “acquiescent”, and sought out treatment, as those requesting to be transgendered do today. Indeed involuntariness is by no means a necessary element in eugenics practices generally. Katz explains that the case histories he examined in his research showed, “Numbers of these histories concern guilt-ridden, self-hating homosexuals, who have so internalized society's condemnation that they seek out cruel forms of treatment as punishment; they play what can only be termed a masochistic game, in which the doctor is assigned, and accepts, a truly sadistic (as well as remunerative) role” (Katz, 1976, p. 200). Katz does not include the transgendering of homosexual men and lesbians within these abusive medical treatments, but Bernice Hausman, in her feminist critique of transgenderism, does (Hausman, 1995). Hausman argues that the treatment of intersexuality and transsexuality in the mid twentieth century was motivated by a large extent by the desire to reduce the possibility of homosexuality and to create heterosexual citizens. She points out the first example of sex change surgery to be highlighted in the media in the US, that of Christine Jorgensen in 1951, concerned a man who described himself to his doctors as either homosexual or a woman, and was persuaded by them that he suffered from a condition that pervaded every cell of his body, that of being a woman (Hausman, 1995). The Jorgensen case led to a surge of interest in changing sex in those who, as Hausman puts it, were thus encouraged to see themselves as patients."

    ReplyDelete
  16. (2.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS WILL INVOLVE EXPOSING THE MISOGYNY BEHIND CULTURAL PRACTICES THAT ARE AS ANCIENT AS HUMAN KIND ITSELF. THAT IS, IF ONE BELIEVES THAT FEMALES EXIST AND ARE HUMAN. FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS, VARIOUS CULTURES HAVE LEFT THEIR MARK ON THE FEMALE ANATOMY IN RATHER GHASTHLY WAYS AND BY VARIOUS BRUTAL METHODS. IT NEVER CEASES, BUT MORPHS INTO ANOTHER FORM.

    WILL FUTURE HISTORIANS VIEW "TOP SURGERY" AND "BOTTOM SURGERY" AS UNUSUAL FORMS OF FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION? IF WE ARE WRONG ABOUT FTM "TRANSITIONING", IT DOES RESEMBLE FEMALE GENITAL MUTILATION IN THAT IT DRASTICALLY ALTERS HEALTHY FEMALE BREASTS, GENITALS, AND REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEMS.

    Dr. Daniel Medalie performs FtM top surgery (double incision mastectomy with nipple grafting)

    (DOUBLE INCISION MASTECTOMY WITH NIPPLE GRAFTING). THIS IS FTM "TOP SURGERY".

    http://www.surgerytheater.com/video/6423/Dr.%20Daniel%20Medalie%20performs%20FtM%20top%20surgery%20(double%20incision%20mastectomy%20with%20nipple%20grafting

    copy and paste link

    Cutting off female areolas and nipples, surgically whittling them down to approximate male size, and sewing them back on after the elective mastectomy. Loss of sensation is common, and sometimes the nipple graft doesn't take resulting in loss of a nipple or two. In "bottom surgery", six to eight inches of skin is grafted from the thigh, arm, or other part of the female body and basically sewn onto the female pubic area. It usually involves multiple surgeries and can be very expensive.

    IN ADDITION TO RADICALLY ALTERING HEALTHY FEMALE GENITALS AND REPRODUCTIVE SYSTEMS, FTM "TRANSITIONING" ACTUALLY ERASES FEMALE IDENTITY. HOW CAN THE ERASING OF FEMALE IDENTITY NOT BE A FEMINIST ISSUE?

    ReplyDelete
  17. (***I exclude individuals with intersex or disorders of sexual development in this post. Intersex are actual medical conditions diagnosed by genetic or other testing whereas transgender is essentially all in one's mind. Most major intersex organizations make a distinction between intersex and transgender.)

    (3.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL RIGHTS WILL BE HUNDREDS, IF NOT THOUSANDS OF WOMEN FILING CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINTS BECAUSE PTSD DUE TO RAPE, SEXUAL ASSAULT, OR CHILDHOOD MOLESTATION IS AS VALID A PSYCHIATRIC DIAGNOSIS AS "GENDER DYSPHORIA". WHY IS ONE PSYCHIATRIC DISORDER OR MENTAL CONDITION MORE IMPORTANT THAN ANOTHER? EVERY TRANSGENDER IDENTIFIED MALE I'VE TALKED TO SAYS THAT HE "FEELS LIKE A WOMAN IN HIS MIND". THIS IS A FEELING OR PERCEPTION THAT THE MIND IS NOT CONGRUENT WITH THE BODY. FOR ALL PRACTICAL PURPOSES, IT'S PSYCHOLOGICAL. SOME WOMEN, ESPECIALLY WOMEN WHO HAVE EXPERIENCED RAPE OR SEXUAL ASSAULT FEEL EXTREME DISCOMFORT WHEN MALES INVADE THEIR PERSONAL SPACE. WOMEN ARE VERY VULNERABLE WHEN THEY HAVE THEIR PANTIES DOWN URINATING. WHY IS ONE MENTAL CONDITION OR DISORDER NAMELY "GENDER DYSPHORIA" MORE IMPORTANT THAN PTSD CAUSED BY RAPE, SEXUAL ASSAULT, OR CHILDHOOD MOLESTATION? THERE ARE ABOUT 300 MILLION PEOPLE IN THE U.S. I BELIEVE IT'S SAFE TO SAY THAT AT LEAST 50,000 TO 100,000 WOMEN HAVE SOME LEVEL OF PTSD BECAUSE OF RAPE, SEXUAL ASSAULT, OR CHILDHOOD SEXUAL TRAUMA. THE NUMBERS COULD BE HIGHER THAN THIS. I'M ONLY THROWING OUT A VERY ROUGH ESTIMATE. THE PSYCHOLOGICAL CONDITION IN WHICH BIOLOGICAL MALES "FEEL LIKE THEY ARE WOMEN INSIDE" IS MORE IMPORTANT THAN THE DISCOMORT THAT WOMEN FEEL WHEN CONFRONTED BY A STRANGE MALE IN THEIR PRIVATE SPACE. RAPE AND SEXUAL ASSAULT IS ALMOST BURNT INTO THE FEMALE COLLECTIVE CONSCIOUS. WHEN ONE IN SIX WOMEN HAVE BEEN VICTIMS OF RAPE OR SEXUAL ASSAULT, SEEING A STRANGE MALE IN THE WOMEN'S RESTROOM MAKES MANY WOMEN UNCOMFORTABLE. WE HAVE TO INSTANTLY JUDGE IN OUR MINDS WHETHER OR NOT WE ARE SAFE. TO SAY THAT SOME WOMEN WITH PTSD DUE TO SEXUAL ASSAULT OR CHILDHOOD MOLESTATION WON'T BE TRIGGERED BY MALES IN WOMEN'S RESTROOMS AND LOCKER ROOMS IS SUCH AN INSULT TO THE ENTIRE SEX THAT I'M STUNNED AND SPEECHLESS. PERHAPS VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN IS SO COMMON PLACE, INVISIBLE, AND MUNDANE THAT IT'S NO LONGER SEEN AS SOMETHING THAT COOL AND TRENDY TO DISCUSS. IT ISN'T THE POLITICAL CAUSE DU JOUR.

    "GENDER DYSPHORIA" OR "GENDER IDENTITY" IS IN ONE'S MIND...IT'S IMPORTANT.

    PTSD IN FEMALES BECAUSE OF SEXUAL ABUSE, RAPE, OR CHILDHOOD SEXUAL TRAUMA IS MOST DEFINITELY IN THE MINDS OF MILLIONS OF WOMEN WORLDWIDE. IT IS NOT TAKEN INTO CONSIDERATION. INDEED, IT'S NOT EVEN ADDRESSED. IT'S NOT EVEN ACKNOWLEDGED. ONE WOULD THINK IT DOESN'T EVEN EXIST.

    ReplyDelete
  18. (3.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL RIGHTS continued...

    ALTHOUGH I'M NOT A RESIDENT OF COLORADO, I PLAN ON DOING SOME TRAVELING THIS SUMMER. ONE MIGHT SAY I WILL BE A TEMPORARY RESIDENT OF COLORAD. I WILL FILE A COMPLAINT WITH THE COLORADO DIVISION OF CIVIL RIGHTS AS WELL AS AN ADA (AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACT) BECAUSE I HAVE DOCUMENTED PTSD FROM SEXUAL TRAUMA AS A CHILD (ONE MALE RELATIVE ASSAULTED ME IN THE BATHROOM WHEN I WAS YOUNGER). THIS IS EXACERBATED AND TRIGGERED WHEN MALES ARE PRESENT WHEN I'M USING THE TOILET. I BELONG TO A CLASS OF PEOPLE WHO SURELY HAVE EXPERIENCED THOUSANDS OF YEARS OF SEXUAL ABUSE OF UNIMAGINABLE SCOPE. UNDER ADA, I EXPECT A REASONABLE ACCOMODATION WHICH SHOULD INCLUDE RESTROOM FACILITIES SPECIFICALLY FOR THE FEMALE SEX FREE FROM MALES. I WILL ALSO CLAIM DISCRIMINATION BASED ON MY SEX. IF THERE IS SOME OTHER LEGAL REMEDY, I WILL PURSUE THIS AS WELL.

    http://cdn.colorado.gov/cs/Satellite/DORA-DCR/CBON/DORA/1251614735957

    I URGE ALL WOMEN WHO HAVE BEEN VICTIMS OF SEXUAL ASSAULT, RAPE, OR MOLESTATION AS GIRLS TO FILE COMPLAINTS WITH THE COLORADO CIVIL RIGHTS DIVISION BASED ON PTSD OR ADA STATUS, OR ANY OTHER LEGAL THEORY SHE CAN THINK OF. GIRLS AND WOMEN MATTER, AND WE SURE AS HELL HAVE HAD OUR SHARE OF SUFFERING FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS. INDEED, IT WOULD TAKE UP THE ENTIRE SPACE ON THIS BLOG AND AT LEAST A HUNDRED MORE BLOGS TO PROPERLY OUTLINE HOW WOMEN HAVE BEEN BRUTALLY OPPRESSED.

    ReplyDelete
  19. What's really disturbing is you obsessing over a 12 year-olds erect penis. Jesus christ, lady!! Maybe get some help if you can't stop obsessing about theoretical sex crimes.

    ReplyDelete
  20. And try not to use all caps when you fill out all your legal petitions. Good luck with your epic crusade, Don Quixote.

    ReplyDelete
  21. "Colorado officials say a suburban Colorado Springs school district discriminated against a 6-year-old transgender girl by preventing her from using the girls' bathroom, in what advocates described as the first such ruling in the next frontier in civil rights."

    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2013/06/24/coy-mathis_n_3488306.html?ir=Gay+Voices

    (4.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL RIGHTS AND HUMAN RIGHTS WILL INVOLVE EXPOSING AND RECORDING THE RAPE AND DEATH THREATS MADE BY CERTAIN MEMBERS OF THE TRANSGENDER COMMUNITY TOWARDS FEMALES WHO ARE OFTEN CALLED "RAD FEMS", RADICAL FEMINISTS, AS WELL AS THREATS MADE TO LESBIANS. BELOW ARE ONLY A SMALL SAMPLING OF SUCH MISOGYNISTIC THREATS AND EXAMPLES OF HATE SPEECH DIRECTED TOWARDS LESBIANS AND FEMINISTS.

    MY SUGGESTION: EMAIL OR WRITE THE COLORADO DIVISION OF CIVIL RIGHTS AND COMPLAIN ABOUT THIS HATE SPEECH.

    ***Please be warned that the vile, utterly misogynistic threats directed towards “rad fems”, lesbians, and intersex people by the transgender community are very graphic.***

    JANUARY 2013

    “Jonathan Reid “Aeryn” Fulton (aka Aerynxv aka aeryn rebeka fulton aka aeryn reid aka aeryn rebeka fulton-chesnavich)

    “EPIC ass-whipping coming your way Nicky. You are sooooo screwed. Shall I meet you at dunkin donuts? I’ll just watch your twitter and see where you are. This is going to be fun. It’s been a long time in coming. BTW I have it on good authority Cathy Brennan will have a terrible accident at this year’s dyke march. THAT”S been a long time coming to. I want your ipod as a trophy. I will get it. See you soon, sweetumz!

    DIAF. All radical feminists will pay a terrible price. 2013 is going to be apocalyptic. We are so done with words. “Making a list, checking it twice, bringing some comeuppance wont that be nice? Planting radfems deep in the ground”.

    If I threaten to eviserate Gallus Mag, and she presses charges, under USA law I have the right to face my accuser. Thus, I will know her identity. Autumn Sandeen is offering $10k for that info.

    This year we are taking Michfest down. 2013 is the year of transequality. Suck it, Brennan! See you at the dyke march.

    I want you all to realize, I’m; the ultimate Libertarian. If you are cool with me, I’m cool with you. IF NOT, LEAVE ME and MINE alone, or I will harm you. Violence is always an option, and I have studied to dispense violence all my life.

    We trans womyn have to battle for our very right to exist and transition against hordes of Fascist JaniceRaymondiod lesbian bulldyke 2nd wave radfems. We do NOT appreciate self-loathing little boyz taking up for the trans-exterminationist diesel dyke crowd. If you come to terms with taking a man as your ex partner, you too can avoid chasing nasty cis-woman coochie and free yourself from cis-woman mind-fuckkery!”

    I think I may go to this Michfest thing, just for the sake of posting all kinds of revealing photos of the local deichs, in various states of dress, ALL OVER THE INTERWEBS….No building bridges here, just pure, HONEST, and unadulterated hatred and intolerance for my ideological blood-enemies.”

    http://gendertrender.wordpress.com/tag/aerynxv/

    ReplyDelete
  22. (4.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL RIGHTS continued...

    Transgender activist Anthony Casebeer was caught making jokes about bashing in the head of a lesbian with a baseball bat. As I understand it, he later resigned from some GLBT organization for these comments.

    “Pimp slap is not enough here: a nice home run swing to the head with a 38-oz Louisville Slugger is more in order. There’s no brains in her head to destroy to start with. It’s personal, and if I ever saw her in my windshield, I’ll be wiping blood off my white Buick. But I won’t be using the brakes.”.

    http://gendertrender.files.wordpress.com/2011/08/monica-violence-1.jpg

    Of course, the lesbian known as dirtywhiteboi67 has received numerous threats from transgender, particularly transmen. *Warning! This is very graphic.

    “…..You are such a weak little old hag of a bitch. Get raped by a bunch of niggers you old crow.”

    “You made this story up you fucking ugly OVER-THE-HILL sagging tits, fat ass ugly repulsive CUNT. You’re just jealous that you’re OLD AS HELL and can NEVER EVER transition successfully the way us young dudes do! We are the men you can never, ever be. Medical science, nanotechnology and genetic engineering is advancing in ways your tiny female, estrogen-dominant gossipy female brain can NEVER imagine. CUNT. And being 25 I will reap the benefits and you will just be a corpse. You’re not even masculine, this shit you’re doing here is totally female…gossipy manipulative psychological warfare. Why don’t you take your fat, over-sized, child-bearing hips sagging cottage cheese ass back in the kitchen and cook your disgusting wrinkled, obese crew-cut trainwreck you call a “girlfriend” another Swanson dinner you useless OLD HAG. KNOW YOUR PLACE and stop treading on us. Stupid useless cunt. No wonder there is so much misogyny…it’s because of bitches like you. Suck a fat one and get AIDS”.

    SOURCE:

    http://dirtywhiteboi67.blogspot.com/2011/12/so-much-fear-and-hatred-from-this-trans.html

    ReplyDelete
  23. (4.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL RIGHTS continued...

    Here is a can of “Rid Fem” spray that “Kills Rad fems Instantly” by “Trans Activists…A Family Company”

    https://www.facebook.com/photo.php?fbid=3042989746089&set=a.1030604477715.2007291.1003456955&type=1&ref=notif&notif_t=like&theater

    Below are other threats directed towards “rad fems” and feminists

    dastardlyinfection:

    “It’s probably for the best that I don’t go to feminist events

    I have a tendency to flail my fists at people’s faces when in close proximity to shitty feminists”

    Doldrumsinferno:

    “Me too…it’s really really fucking frustrating”

    http://violenttransarchives.tumblr.com/

    “If I had any superpower I’d have the power to punch people through computer screens

    Within a week there’d be no more radical feminism.”

    http://violenttransarchives.tumblr.com/

    “Brennan, go fuck yourself with a rusted chainsaw. Better cover it in various toxins too, I hear that those enhance the experience.”

    http://genderbitch.tumblr.com/post/26227759103/fuc…

    http://violenttransarchives.tumblr.com/page/2

    “sometimes i get so irritated by people who try to belittle me for being trans. especially women. the thing that gets me is that they’re always disgusting looking, or you know, just plain ugly.

    the only thought that ever comes to my mind is “i may have a dick, but i make a hotter woman than you do. so what exactly does that make you?”

    but, instead, i remain calm. i laugh in their face, or make a joke out of them in some other way. you know, real sly-like. i act like it doesn’t bother me that a neanderthal of a woman is trying to lessen my worth, or my femininity. because let’s be honest… what do they know about any of that anyways?

    regardless, it still takes every fiber of my being not to bash them in their putrid face with a brick.”

    http://violenttransarchives.tumblr.com/page/2

    ReplyDelete
  24. "What's really disturbing is you obsessing over a 12 year-olds erect penis. Jesus christ, lady!! Maybe get some help if you can't stop obsessing about theoretical sex crimes."

    ATTENTION: TEENAGE GIRLS..

    ..NEVER MIND THE ERECTION POKING OUT OF THE SKIRT ON THE "GIRL" IN THE WOMEN'S RESTROOM... IT'S NOT POLITE TO STARE...

    ..IF THIS "GIRL" FORGETS TO COMPLETELY CLOSE THE BATHROOM STALL DOOR, OR IF THE LOCK DOESN'T WORK AND YOU WALK IN ON "HER", IT'S IMPOLITE TO STARE WHILE "SHE" IS ADJUSTING "HER" PENIS..

    I'VE HAD OTHER WOMEN WALK IN ON ME BECAUSE I FORGOT TO TURN THE LITTLE LATCH ON THE STALL DOOR, OR THE LATCH DOESN'T WORK. OF COURSE, A TEENAGE BOY WOULD NEVER FORGET TO MAKE SURE THE LATCH WORKS...

    AS TO SEX CRIMES, SEX CRIME AGAINST FEMALES ARE SO COMMON PLACE THAT IT'S TAKEN FOR GRANTED, BUT IF SOMEONE "MIS-GENDERS" A BIOLOGICAL MALE WHO SAYS HE "FEELS LIKE A WOMAN INSIDE", OR PREVENTS A BIOLOGICAL MALE FROM USING THE GIRL'S RESTROOM THE COLORADO DIVISION OF CIVIL RIGHTS WILL COME TO THEIR RESCUE.

    ReplyDelete
  25. (5.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS WILL EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE SILENCING OF FEMIINIST VOICES.

    Weekend Edition June 21-23, 2013

    The Same Sexual Threats, the Same Silence for Women

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/21/55123/

    The Emperor’s New Penis

    by LIERRE KEITH and DERRICK JENSEN

    "Men have been silencing women for ten thousand years and it’s happening still.

    At the “Law and Disorder Conference” in Portland, OR, on May 11-12, two women were peacefully tabling, handing out literature, and selling books from our organization, Deep Green Resistance. A group of five queer activists came up to the table and one of the men began shouting at the women, using aggressive language and threatening gestures. He grabbed and defaced table materials. When one of the women went to protect the materials, he marked her arm and hand as well.

    This conference states it has a policy of safer spaces, but “safer spaces” evidently doesn’t apply to women, because although most people in the room had no choice but to hear the shouting, no one, including the organizers, intervened to stop this man and his aggressive behavior.

    A half an hour later, a male DGR member tried to engage in respectful conversation with these queer activists. They began insulting him, and escalated to throwing trash and food at his head. Apparently the “safer space” policy doesn’t apply to men, either.

    The next day the DGR crew went back for more tabling, and an angry mob of queer activists again approached the table, yelling and cursing at them, and demanded that they leave. You can watch the video. The DGR members were respectful and courteous. They tried to de-escalate. Nonetheless, they were the recipients of bullying, threats, and silencing. Once again, for all their talk of “safer spaces,” the organizers did not intervene.

    In a statement later released on the conference’s Facebook page, one of the organizers defended the attacks, saying, “Speaking personally as a white cis-male, it is not my place to dictate how anyone who feels unsafe or oppressed by DGR’s transphobia should respond to it.” So safe space does not in any way mean physical safety, as in freedom from aggression and assault. It means freedom to be aggressive and assaultive if you feel oppressed. What this in practice meant is that a man assaulted a woman for disagreeing with him, and destroyed books he disagreed with as well.

    What’s his complaint?

    He accused DGR of “transphobia.” This is absurd. The book and other materials never even mention the words “transgender” or “queer,” let alone include calls to dehumanize or harm anyone. They do, however, contain a feminist critique of gender. The disagreement is that queer/trans activists believe gender is a binary, and we believe it’s a hierarchy.

    That’s it. That’s why they attacked us.

    And in the time since, queer/trans activists have threatened DGR members with arson, rape, murder. They have created photoshopped pictures of us simulating bestiality. They have called for mass beheading of DGR members. We have done none of those things to anyone. Any member of DGR who did would be banned immediately. Yet queer/trans activists are accusing us of intolerance and hate.

    Seriously?"

    ReplyDelete
  26. (5.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS... continued

    "Deep Green Resistance is an environmental organization, based on the eponymous book that we co-authored. DGR is also a feminist organization. Between us, we have spent six decades fighting sexual violence and writing about the patriarchal culture that creates rape and, through it, the class of “people called women.” Our analysis is informed by a century and a half of feminist theory and activism. Our views are in no way unique. We believe that a social system of male domination starts with human beings who are biologically male or female and creates two social classes of people: men and women. Socialization to either group can be a brutal process.

    Men are made by socialization to masculinity. Being a man requires a psychology based on emotional numbness and a dichotomy of self and other. This is also the psychology required by soldiers, which is why we don’t think you can be a peace activist without being a feminist.

    Female socialization is a process of psychologically constraining and breaking girls—otherwise known as “grooming”—to create a class of compliant victims. Femininity is a set of behaviors that are, in essence, ritualized submission.

    We see nothing in the creation of gender to celebrate or embrace. As feminists, we are abolitionists. Patriarchy is a corrupt and brutal arrangement of power, and we want to see it dismantled so that the category of gender no longer exists. This is also our position on race and class. The categories are not natural: they only exist because hierarchical systems of power create them (see, for instance, Audrey Smedley’s book Race in North America). We want a world of justice and equality, where the material conditions that currently create race, class, and gender have been forever overcome.

    There are, of course, people who disagree with feminism. In their view, men and women display domination and submission, respectively, not because of social conditions, but because we have different brains. Gendered behavior is natural, they say, a function of our biology. Boys are naturally aggressive and active, while girls are naturally emotional and passive. The claim is often that prenatal hormones create these propensities, and that the “wrong” hormones can produce the “wrong” brain. Hence it is possible to have a man’s body with a woman’s brain (which adherents like to call a “lady brain”). Cursory research will reveal the variations and disagreements amongst the genderists. Some, for instance, believe that gender is a matter of costuming—what they call “presentation.” Their problem with gender isn’t gender per se, but that there are social constraints on what men can wear. On the other extreme are people who argue that their genitals are a “birth defect” that require surgical removal. Some people believe that their children’s genitals are a birth defect. And yes, we hope that readers will find that chilling."

    ReplyDelete
  27. (5.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS continued...

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/21/55123/

    "We can’t do justice to the range of genderist beliefs in this short article. The point is that we disagree with them. Because of that disagreement two of our members were assaulted, assaults which the conference organizers neither stopped nor condemned, and which genderists have applauded all across the internet.

    So, women, note well: if you have the temerity to name male supremacy, men have the right to assault you in public. Shut the bitches up. It’s worked for ten thousand years, why would men change their tactics now? That shutting up has also involved harassing organizers and venues that dare to host DGR speakers and bookstores that carry our books. It also involves sexual threats against women. A photo of DGR speaker Rachel Ivey appears covered with glitter and the word “penis” in fat letters. For those who don’t get the reference, genderists throw glitter on people they don’t like. They call it “glitter bombing.” So the picture is suggesting that Rachel be assaulted with glitter and a penis. The word for that is rape.

    This from people who are trying to claim the moral high ground as an oppressed minority. But the Emperor’s new penis is looking just like the old: same bullying, same threats, same assaults. Same sexual terrorism, same silencing. And feminism—the movement that tells the terrible truths about women’s lives and aims to change them—is being disappeared.

    Starting with the category “woman.” Transgender activist Joelle Ruby Ryan has written that the terms “female” and “sex-class” are “offensive and passé.” One might reasonably wonder why Ryan is eager to claim membership in a group so declared, or why Ryan got a job teaching Women’s Studies if “female” is so offensive. But the bigger fault line here is between feminism and post-modernism, and its offspring Queer Theory. That a biological reality—female—can be called “offensive” shows how far down the rabbit hole Queer Theory has fallen. What’s next, gravity? And if female is “passé,” well, there goes life on earth.

    But to make “sex-class” a dirty word means that the realities of women’s lives become once more unspeakable, each woman cut adrift in a hostile, chaotic sea. Apply the word “sex-class,” and that chaos snaps into a sharp pattern of subordination, from the small, daily insults to body and soul to the shattering traumas of incest and rape. The crimes men commit against women aren’t done to women as random individuals; they’re done because women belong to a subordinate class and they’re done to keep women a subordinate class.

    But the solution to oppression is always embedded in the problem: you make common cause with the people who share your condition. Sisterhood is indeed powerful. The women who built the most recent sisterhood—the so-called Second Wave—are being derided by genderists like Ryan. The insults usually reference bad haircuts and fashion—because how women look is vastly more important than what they might try to do. A short catalog of their silly little projects: rape crisis hotlines, battered women’s shelters, abortion and birth control on demand, gender-neutral help wanted ads, sexual harassment laws, equal funding for girls’ sports, and a storming of the barricades in the trades and professions. Derrick’s mother stayed with her abusive husband because there were no battered women’s shelters in the 1950s. Lierre’s mother endured the torture of an illegal abortion because there was no other choice in 1961. These are life and death issues for women. Only someone very short on memory or very long on male privilege could call them “passé.”

    ReplyDelete
  28. (5.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS WILL EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE SILENCING OF FEMIINIST VOICES.

    Weekend Edition June 21-23, 2013

    The Same Sexual Threats, the Same Silence for Women

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/21/55123/


    "But the basic truths of women’s lives are once more becoming unspeakable. Why? Because genderists are literally shouting feminists down to shut us up. They’ve declared “female” passé, probably because even they can see past the postmodern smoke and mirrors: they know they can never be biologically female. Instead, they’ve laid claim to “woman.” Their definition of woman lines up rather precisely with everything that the Princess Industrial Complex constrains girls into accepting and that sexual violations break women into being. The genderists claim that this is all natural, eternal, basic to the structure of the universe. A typical comment: “There is a distinct, substantive, immutable feminine gender, and it can not be transcended.” This is what systems of power always have to imprint on our psyches: not only is this state of affairs natural, resistance is futile. We beg to disagree. Some of us are living proof that feminine gender can be transcended—and the feminist movement is even larger proof that it can be fought.

    But the genderists don’t want to resist gender. They are, in fact, quite attached to it. Writes one, “It would be a crying shame if ‘woman’ and ‘man’ ceased to be relevant categories for me to play with.” Substitute poor and rich or black and white if you don’t understand how offensive that is. People being oppressed are not categories to be played with. If you understand that, the only question left is: are women people?

    The strangest part of this whole debate is that feminists are being called biological essentialists. The genderists baldly state their belief in “brain sex” and the immortal, even cosmic, nature of femininity . White supremacists are the only people who believe in the “Negro brain.” But talk of “lady brains” is completely accepted across progressive communities if it comes from genderists. Feminists, in contrast, start with Simone DeBeauvior: “One is made, not born a woman.” It’s that making that we intend to stop. It can be stopped because gender is a social process. It’s the genderists who claim it’s biological, immutable. Yet we get called essentialist?

    And it’s the genderists who conform. For all their talk of gender-bending, their goal is cosmetics, costumes, and surgery to match their bodies to gender caricatures. They are permanently altering their bodies—removing healthy organs and in some cases the ability to ever experience sexual pleasure again—to better fit a corrupt and brutal arrangement of power. This is now being done to children and some of the children already regret it. Please read that sentence again. Please."

    ReplyDelete
  29. (5.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS WILL EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE SILENCING OF FEMIINIST VOICES.

    Weekend Edition June 21-23, 2013

    The Same Sexual Threats, the Same Silence for Women

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/21/55123/

    "The children should be an alarm call but no one is listening. There are historical precedents from which left-leaning people should have learned. Much of the Progressive movement embraced eugenics, until the optimistic, shiny promise of science produced punctual trains to crematoriums. Similarly, in the 1950s many liberals believed that chemical castration was the compassionate approach to homosexuality. We look back in bewildered horror but refuse to see that it’s happening now. The unfit are being chemically sterilized once again. People are being surgically mutilated in the service of social conformity. Children as young as eighteen months are being “diagnosed” as transgender. What does that even mean in someone who has yet to speak her first word? She preferred the blue pacifier to the pink? The real question: so what if she did? Girls can’t like blue, play rough and tumble, take up space, run for President? Apparently not. Free to Be, You and Me, through Surgery. The prison of gender is locking down ever tighter.

    And the female body is the cage. Most women are at constant war with their bodies, and it’s a war we lose before first grade: fifty percent of pre-school girls think they are “too fat.” If a girl makes it through that battlefield, with its devastating cultural terrain of dehumanizing and sadistic images, the big guns are waiting: by the time they’re ten, 90 percent of girls have been subjected to unwanted sexual attention by neighborhood boys, and by the time they’re eleven, it’s adult men threatening the violations to that same 90 percent. This is the meaning of “female” in patriarchy, learned early and often: an object to be publicly used. Get used to it, girls. Meanwhile, eating disorders, the slow, grinding punishment of the female fat cell, have the highest mortality of all mental illness.

    The most heartbreaking element of the transgender narrative is their hatred of their bodies. In the war between culture and nature, gender and body, the body loses. And that defeat is turned into an identity. The only parallel claim is made by the anorexics’ Pro-Anas, who insist their wrenching disjuncture of self and body is a legitimate identity. We have no doubt that people hate their bodies: willful starvation and surgical mutilation speak with a stark, eloquent evidence. The question is why.

    Guy Debord wrote presciently of the society of the spectacle, where “being becomes having and having is reduced to merely appearing.” This is, of course, what has happened, and then some: commodity fetishism has conquered every human relationship, including, finally, that between body and self. Instead of inhabiting “the soft animal of your body,” as poet Mary Oliver so sweetly puts it, the body is an object to own and then to starve or slice until it approximates the punishing, promising image. Our genitals are now a commodity to be obtained rather than tissue to inhabit, the exquisite nerve endings where animal meets angel severed to create a surgical simulacrum. Perhaps the commodity has finally been defeated by a greater force: the image itself."

    ReplyDelete
  30. (5.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS WILL EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE SILENCING OF FEMIINIST VOICES.

    Weekend Edition June 21-23, 2013

    The Same Sexual Threats, the Same Silence for Women

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/21/55123/


    "The body has certainly fallen to its assault. Writes a detransitioned 22-year-old woman, “I saw myself in the saucy lankiness of scruffy rock gods, the devil-may-care grins of thrill seekers in films, the deep pain of confusion written on the faces of James Dean and Johnny Depp, but I could not see myself in any of the women I looked at.” In the service of the image—and sundered from her body by sexual abuse—she had her breasts removed at seventeen and started taking testosterone, which nearly killed her. Which is more toxic: the chemicals injected to destroy one’s natal sex or the culture that makes that sex a prison? And why are we not allowed to ask that question?

    An identity based on a hatred of the body by definition cannot be liberatory. Those soft animals are our only homes. Driven from our bodies, we are permanent refugees: there is nowhere else to go. The whole point of feminism is to stop the breakage: the incest, the rape, the battering, the so-called beauty practices like Female Genital Mutilation that amount to a life of torture. That means we have to stop the ideology, too, the one that says men are human while women exist to be conquered and used, the one called gender. Measured by either sheer volume or effect, the ruling image of the age, the one delivering the ideology, is the pounding sadism of pornography. And the prison cell called “woman” grows ever smaller. From an athlete’s basement in Steubenville, OH, to a bus in New Delhi, and back to another Ohio basement, this one a decade long: do not call that prison passé.

    Isn’t all this worth discussing? Why do we have to plead something so basic: in a pluralistic democracy, people can hold differing beliefs? Ideas qua ideas are our only defense against the human tendency to fundamentalism with all its attendant horrors. That’s why books are so much more fragile than paper, and why they need our defense. We don’t say that as writers but as citizens."

    ReplyDelete
  31. (5.) THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS WILL EXPOSE THE DELIBERATE SILENCING OF FEMIINIST VOICES.

    Weekend Edition June 21-23, 2013

    The Same Sexual Threats, the Same Silence for Women

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/21/55123/


    "Right now the gender fundamentalists are doing their best to shut down dialogue. They’ve damaged books—books that don’t even mention their concern—pressured bookstores, and silenced speakers scheduled at universities. It should come as no surprise that they are using the final tactics of all fundamentalists: bullying, threats, assault. And they’ve done this with increasing frequency and intensity. How long does it take to see the pattern?

    What’s most disturbing is the public response. Men who have assaulted women are held up as heroes; the angry mob is celebrated. There is a war against women on the left as well as on the right. If you don’t believe us, speak up and see for yourself.

    And then speak up because justice demands it. Name the sex-caste system as rape culture. Stand with women against that culture. Protect children from medical intervention. Defend the human animal, the integrity of body and brain, flesh and fat. There is nothing wrong with it. Especially there is nothing wrong with anyone’s genitals: not ever.

    And shield the books. When the bullies go after the books, surely it is time to notice. And notice that it’s the same male Emperor, the same sexual threats, the same silence for women. Notice before women are lost once more in that same, unspeakable sea."

    ReplyDelete
  32. the person who posts repeated and long long comments, while obviously passionate, ruins every thread here (though I am on her 'side')

    ReplyDelete
  33. By the way, has anyone heard about the THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS lately?
    Just wondering.

    ReplyDelete
  34. @By the way, has anyone heard about the THE NEXT FRONTIER IN CIVIL AND HUMAN RIGHTS lately?
    Just wondering.

    You mean poor children or women? No you mean white men all up and hard in a pair a fishnets. The guys that use children as a cover to deflect attention away from the compulsive sexual fetish--little gay kids that grow up all drugged and mutilated so that people don't notice the fact that the 80% of the club are auto erotic cross dressers. Don't think so.

    Heard about the SCOTUS today. LBG is cutting the bad boys loose. Party's over, now is the time to protect kids and women. Because in certain states women will not be supporting anything until the dicks are out of our space. Until the identity laws change to protect women, economically, and educationally and with medical care.

    And now it is so much easier. Let's see some women need IVF--not paid for by insurance or medicare. But Tranny tits are covered? Ut oh, sounds like discrimination. Women who are so depressed they can leave the house for want a child, but the money went to teats on a board. Brace yourselves--it is going to an onslaught.

    And then thousands of women with PSDT all verified contacting law makers and boards. The web is gonna be crawling with the lovely examples of Trans, the threats, the violence. And not to mention the discrimination against women fertility groups with the support of doctors and clinics are launching massive campaigns on insurance companies. I mean if they pay for men to get a blind pouch they gotta pay for women to feel whole? Right. Do you think that they want to cover IVF--no they don't but if the cover Trans they will have to. Very expensive. So trans will be dropped.

    And we will do this in every state that offers trans coverage and not coverage for women. Plus ask for punitive damages. And even medicade who is to say a poor Tranny is more important than a poor woman who has a biological desire to be a mother--she has diagnosed with severe depression. You can't imagine how bright our outlook is today for women. God bless the SCOTUS. LBG will be running from you guys.

    ReplyDelete
  35. "And now it is so much easier. Let's see some women need IVF--not paid for by insurance or medicare. But Tranny tits are covered? Ut oh, sounds like discrimination. Women who are so depressed they can leave the house for want a child, but the money went to teats on a board. Brace yourselves--it is going to an onslaught."

    I completely agree. After all, all women should be treated the same. There is a special group of "women" called transsexuals who expect access to certain procedures and health care coverage that other women aren't entitled to.

    People would be outraged if only white women were entitled to certain procedures and health insurance coverage that other women were denied. After all, all women should be the same and entitled to the same coverage and procedures. Biological males who say they are "women" get special plastic surgery and years of hormones to make them feel "more like a woman inside". It's basically psychological in that they "feel trapped in the wrong body or whatever. If one group of "women" can get extensive plastic surgery on their male genitalia and female hormones to make themselves feel "womanly inside", why can't women get plastic surgery to make them feel "more womanly inside" or IVF because they are depressed for want of a child?

    No matter how we look at it, one group of "women" get special coverage. It's discrimination and women who don't get special treatment should file a complaint. It causes these women great emotional stress and trauma. It's an injustice.

    ReplyDelete
  36. Go kill yourself, Lynn.. Lynyrd Fucktard.

    ReplyDelete
  37. Replacing "gender identity" with sex is evolving into a surreal, Orwellian nightmare for girls and women on so many levels.

    "No other class of persons seeking protection under anti-discrimination legislation has attempted to intentionally disregard another protected class -until now".

    www.sexnotgender.com

    http://www.scribd.com/doc/83995209/Stereotypes-Flier4

    ReplyDelete
  38. Please stop insulting black people...

    Some people even had the audacity to allude to "separate but equal" as in the Civil Rights movement. The brave black souls who were beaten and jailed in the Jim Crow South must be rolling over in their graves.

    Coy was allowed to attend school like all other boys his age. He could go to the same classrooms and attend all other school functions. The school said that he shouldn't use the girl's restroom because when he gets older and starts to develop, he could make the girls uncomfortable. From what I've read, the school was letting him use the nurse's restroom or a staff restroom. This wasn't good enough for the mother because her son just had to use the girl's restroom. Apparently, this falls under "separate but equal".

    (1.) From everything that I've read, Coy is a biological male. He was born male and has male genitalia. If he were actually intersex, it probably would have been discovered by now. The majority of transgender individuals don't have an actual intersex medical condition. I know that the transgender community has shamelessly co-opted intersex, but transgender is not the same as disorders of sexual development. It's essentially in their minds. All the articles I've read states that Coy is male with male genitalia.

    (2.) Males are in fact different than females. They have different reproductive systems. The genetics are different, and when they go through adolescence, these difference are quite remarkable. All primates reproduce sexually. To pretend that there are no differences between the sexes flies in the face of common sense.

    Coy will never menstruate or get pregnant. He doesn't have a uterus or ovaries. Coy won't stay six years old all his life. When he start junior high, while awkward girls are starting their adolescent development into young women, menstruation etc., what will he be doing? How will teenage girls feel with a boy in their restroom? Teenage girls will be changing their tampon or pad with a boy sitting in the next bathroom stall, or standing outside the stall door.

    ReplyDelete
  39. Stop insulting black people continued...their history doesn't belong to the transgender community

    ...transgender will shameless co-opt just about anything...

    (3.) Unlike sex and race which are actual realities which are permanent, "gender identity" is for the most part socially constructed, culturally based, and changeable. For example, a black person can't actually change their race or genetics. They might change their outward appearance, but their inheritance is of African descent. Also, biological females can't change their genetics. All they can do is change their outward appearance. Race and biological sex are fixed for all practical purposes.

    There is nothing stopping six year old Coy from waking up tomorrow and saying that he wants to be a boy again. He could do this six months or six years from now. This is how idiotic "gender identity" has become. It doesn't matter if a male identities as a "woman" for one day, one month, or one year. From what I gather, all that is required is the desire or ability to identify as a woman.

    This is a mtv video about two young people who detransitioned, or went back to the sex they were born into.

    http://www.mtv.com/videos/true-life-im-questioning-my-gender-again/1704884/playlist.jhtml

    This is another example of someone detransitioning, or a man deciding that he really isn't a woman after all.

    DETROIT (CN) - A man who had his genitals cut off so he could be a woman, then had second thoughts about it and wanted to be a man again, sued Michigan for refusing to issue him a third birth certificate, recertifying him as a man.

    http://www.courthousenews.com/2013/04/11/56571.htm

    'I was born a boy, became a girl, and now I want to be a boy again': Britain's youngest sex swap patient to reverse her sex change treatment
    http://www.dailymail.co.uk/femail/article-2224753/Ria-Cooper-Britains-youngest-sex-change-patient-reverse-treatment.html#ixzz2AjFa43a9

    HAS ANY BLACK PERSON EVER GONE FROM BEING BLACK TO WHITE, AND THEN GONE BACK TO BEING BLACK AGAIN? This is ludicrous on its face, and an insult to all black people everywhere. Black people can't undo their race or ancestry. Biological females cannot undo their genetics or the fact that they were born with female reproductive systems.

    ReplyDelete
  40. Liking pink blankets means that you are a girl....

    ...no two ways about it...you are a girl

    Moreover, it's not the least bit sexist to believe pink blankets mean girl not boy....

    "At 5 months, she took a pink blanket meant for her sister Lily. Later, she showed little interest in toy cars and boy clothes with pictures of sports, monsters and dinosaurs on them."

    http://www.cbsnews.com/8301-204_162-57590781/colorado-transgender-girl-6-wins-discrimination-case/

    If six year old boys pick up a pink blanket and refuse to play with toy cars, then THEY MUST BE REALLY BE GIRLS. They can't just be boys who prefer a pink blanket because everyone knows boys think and dress one way and girls think and dress another way. This sure seems like a politically correct, Orwellian way of just reinforcing traditional sex roles. It's trendy, pseudo-progressive, warmed over sexism masked by edgy, coolness.

    There is no way, especially at this age, to distinguish between the "gender dysphoria" and:

    (1.)culture (everything the parents read on the internet about transgender, what they hear from friends, etc.)

    (2.) parental attitudes about what is and isn't considered proper "masculine" or "feminine" behavior



    ReplyDelete
  41. anonymous 8:29 If you're going to do that, please focus your efforts on making sure abortion remains available and covered for all women, before you make up claims about women suffering from their biological clock.

    I'm betting if any infertile women are that depressed, its due to patriarchy and religious fundamentalism. Although there are transgender people who are depressed about becoming infertile. There's too many people on the planet already though.

    ReplyDelete
  42. Well, Cole you are wrong again, color me shocked--. Religious fundamentalism does not believe in intervention to conceive or to not conceive. Conception is in gods hands --zero points for you.

    In fact none of the women are associated with any religious organization. Some women feel the need to be mothers and their need is just as profound as a someones delusion. Women ovulate for a reason and no court will deny that.

    2. Abortion has never been covered by insurance, ever--zero points

    3. The women are educated women with high powered careers, professional, highly educated. And they got a case, insurance that will cover Trans crap but not them. They also have the backing of fertility doctors--real medical people not people that mutilate bodies. As far as medical people go--well they are all greedy and their is more of them and more money to be made in fertility than in Trans.

    I somehow doubt that telling women to get over their depression about conception is gonna work--Trans can get over theirs. Who is to say who feels more. And shrinks will be just as quick to support this as anything else. Along a similar line dismissing it as women being brain washed by religion--will not hold much water. Women have the right to want have babies without checking in with the Trans big boys or the "I'm a nasty white spoiled Queer folk" Women have the science and medical evidence. Trans are depressed because they want a constant hard on in the fishnets or they are lesbians that want to be way cool. Because lesbian is so over and so last year--see under: spoiled rich white kid.

    Who do you think the court is going to give a rats ass about? There are Fertility clinics in every major hospital and University in the country. Who would love it if insurance covered fertility--LOVE IT. But that is moot because the bottom line is the insurance companies will stop offering Trans service because it is discrimination to not provide comparable service to females. So neither will be covered and that will be that. You see them looking PC is only worth it when it isn't gonna cost--that's capitalism. And that principle goes for Medicade too. Can't discriminate by sex or Jendur. And since Trans will not be a party they get no say. Women on all fronts can challenge and as we out number will prevail. So it comes back to the women's spaces--we don't care about XX--whatever they are not a threat. But XY with a dick (which unless they can pay out of pocket will be them) See a kind two pronged approach to keep women safe while we wait for all these kids to realize they been used and screwed.

    ReplyDelete
  43. That's my point, as a Canadian where I'm pretty sure Abortion and the morning after pill are covered, but birth control prescriptions aren't; looking at the US, where all these senators want to take abortion rights away from women, it looks terrifying.

    As to fundamentalism, I was referring to the quiverful movement, where women have 10 plus kids. An infertile women raised in that ideology may end up feeling bad that she can't conceive.

    And I wish transgender people could live with being androgynous, not using hormones etc. But it isn't my or your place to judge those who chose differently.

    And many, many transgender men like men, we're not all gay females. Are we autoandroophile females?

    ReplyDelete
  44. Colorado Department of Civil Rights...

    ...boys using girl's restroom is a violation of their civil rights....

    ...males harassing uppity females because they don't like what they have to say or how they think...

    ..this **it is ancient....it's always the **tches fault...

    The women from Deep Green Resistance who were harassed, had food thrown at them, books marked, etc. should file a complaint with the Oregon Division of Civil Rights. They were not the aggressors. Indeed, they were doing nothing but sitting behind a little table with books and pamphlets. THEY WERE VERBALLY HARASSED AND INTENTIONALLY INTIMIDATED BECAUSE OF THEIR BELIEFS. THEY WEREN'T EVEN DISCUSSING ANYTHING RELATED TO TRANSGENDER.

    MALES HAVE ALWAYS FELT ENTITLED TO SHUT THE UPPITY **TCHES UP. IT'S WORKED FOR THOUSANDS OF YEARS...SO, WHY SHOULD THEY CHANGE NOW.

    At the “Law and Disorder Conference” in Portland, OR, on May 11-12, two women were peacefully tabling, handing out literature, and selling books from our organization, Deep Green Resistance. A group of five queer activists came up to the table and one of the men began shouting at the women, using aggressive language and threatening gestures. He grabbed and defaced table materials. When one of the women went to protect the materials, he marked her arm and hand as well.

    Weekend Edition June 21-23, 2013

    The Same Sexual Threats, the Same Silence for Women

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/21/55123/

    Defaced books...because...well, they don't like what they say...

    http://organizingforwomensliberation.wordpress.com/2013/05/18/photos-from-transqueer-attack-on-the-women-of-dgr/


    Rachel Ivey, an intelligent and brave young woman, should immediately file a civil rights complaint.

    "So, women, note well: if you have the temerity to name male supremacy, men have the right to assault you in public. Shut the bitches up. It’s worked for ten thousand years, why would men change their tactics now? That shutting up has also involved harassing organizers and venues that dare to host DGR speakers and bookstores that carry our books. It also involves sexual threats against women. A photo of DGR speaker Rachel Ivey appears covered with glitter and the word “penis” in fat letters. For those who don’t get the reference, genderists throw glitter on people they don’t like. They call it “glitter bombing.” So the picture is suggesting that Rachel be assaulted with glitter and a penis. The word for that is rape.


    Weekend Edition June 21-23, 2013

    The Same Sexual Threats, the Same Silence for Women

    http://www.counterpunch.org/2013/06/21/55123/

    ReplyDelete
  45. I want to return to the six year old child from Colorado and the mother.

    First, the mother...

    (1.) From what I have read, Coy was one of triplets. This is nothing unusual, but the mother giving birth to her triplets in a kiddie pool in the living room sounds strange. Who does this, and is this safe?

    I "met" her online six years ago when she came to the Triplet Connection and made a huge ruckus because she was dead-set on homebirthing her "natural" triplets in a kiddie pool in her living room...

    She did actually successfully homebirth her natural children in her living room in a kiddie pool and she became a sensation in the Birthing Communities and Natural Parenting communities.



    http://fourtimesthefun.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-one-where-i-weigh-in-on.html

    Is this true? There has to be a way to find out if it's true or not. There would be hospital records if the triplets were born in a hospital. Was a mid-wife involved? I'm not a doctor, but giving birth to triplets in a kiddie pool in the living room (water birth) doesn't sound too safe or wise to me.

    (2.) Did the mother really order clomid from Mexico, and became pregnant using non-prescribed fertility drugs?

    http://fourtimesthefun.blogspot.com/2013/02/the-one-where-i-weigh-in-on.html

    http://www.mothering.com/community/t/410750/clomid-with-out-a-prescription

    (3.) I really hate to talk about any mother, and all children are a precious blessing, but the more I read the stranger it gets.

    "I am a mom of 4 amazing, wonderful, awesome children (and one on the way!). Dakota is 5 1/2 years old and has Autism. Coy, Max, and Lily are 3 1/2 year old triplets. Coy is our special little neuro-typical child. Max is also on the Autism spectrum. Lily had a very bad brain injury as a 4 month old and is about like having a 1-2 month old baby, but is so much fun (and feisty!). I work full time at home as Lily’s nurse as well as being a professional photographer outside the home. "

    http://visionarymom.com/an-interview-with-kathryn-mathis/#sthash.24P7b1iw.dpuf

    Dakota has autism

    Max...autism spectrum

    Lily, bless her heart, is severely mentally impaired because of a brain injury at 4 months old

    In one interview, Coy is "neuro-typical" according to the mother. Wait, Coy is now special too.

    After Lilly, one of the triplets, becomes severely brain damaged, six year old Coy starts expressing the belief that he is a girl.

    Goes on national t.v. and seems to glow in the spot light. Do people see a pattern here? Attention seeking behavior...my kid is special...notice me ...

    Munchausen by Proxy is a thought..

    Again, bless the kids, but something just doesn't seem right. No one is allowed to look at the mother or the family dynamics.


    Questions related to Coy...

    (1.) Who diagnosed this six year old male child with "gender identity disorder". What is his or her name and what is his or her background, education, etc. From what I gather, it's not called "gender identity disorder" anymore, and has been replaced with "gender dysphoria".

    (2.) Did Coy really express himself as a girl since he was 18 months old?

    "Coy Mathis was labeled male at birth, but Coy's parents say Coy has expressed herself as a girl since she was 18 months old."

    http://www.thedenverchannel.com/news/local-news/state-finds-school-discriminated-against-transgender-child-coy-mathis-in-bathroom-use-lawyers-say

    In this interview, there is no mention of Coy saying this, or expressing this belief. In earlier photos, he is wearing boy's clothes. Moreover, how does an 18 month old child "express" anything?

    http://visionarymom.com/an-interview-with-kathryn-mathis/

    ReplyDelete

Copyright © The dirt from Dirt | Powered by Blogger
Design by SimpleWpThemes | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com | Distributed By Blogger Templates20