Friday, May 18, 2012

Why Gays and Lesbians Need to Separate Ourselves and Our Politics from the Transgendered


Below is where GID, the diagnosis that is required for transition, resides in the current version of the DSM and has done so for nearly the last 20 years:
Look at the other disorders/abnormalities that surround GID and contemplate for a moment what any of that has to do with Homosexuality/Lesbianism. Then contemplate for a few more moments what our (gays and lesbians) proximity (lGBT) to those diagnosed with GID and deemed trans says to the general public. Gays and lesbians fought, some were raped (usually by the police), some beaten, some died in order to not only prove that whom we fall in love with and desire doesnt make us mentally disordered, but we politically banded together to force the hereto-patriarchal male medical machine's hand in removing Homosexuality from the DSM!

In the span of decades that GID (the trans disorder) has been included in the DSM and will be included in the next version which will be published early next year, there has yet to be a single Trans movement political or personal aimed at removing GID from the DSM. In fact there have been small movements within the Trans community, working to KEEP GID in the DSM! Why? Because those whose medical insurance covers their exorbitant surgeries and the life time of drugs needed to maintain their mental delusions of themselves. I have never met, never heard of and never read historically of a single gay or lesbian who needed mutilative surgeries and/or drugs to be or maintain being gay or lesbian. This social disease has NOTHING to do with us politically!

The above is a snippet of the changes that are being made to GID in the next version of the DSM. Instead of being labeled Gender Identity DISORDER, it is being generalized into Gender Dysphoria (more money to be made as it can be easily applied to just about anyone). This is due to some from the political side of the Trans community complaining that they disliked the word "disorder" being imposed on them. Meanwhile Gender Dysphoria's placement in the DSM is fine. Although it makes zero sense to me that the Trans Community would be so angry at having been labeled with a disorder, yet clearly do not mind a different label that continues to be housed in Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders (DSM)!


There is a whole SIX questions in the soon to be 5th edition of the DSM utilized as the main criteria for determining whether someone has GID/GD. Below is a snippet of number six:
If not to eradicate homosexuals/lesbians through transition, why would the male medical machine be concerned with sexual orientation which has zero to do with GID/GD???

But most importantly why are we as a community, as a political community, colluding with a group that by proximity alone keeps homosexuality solidly between the pages of the bible for mental disorders? Which in turn continues keeping us read by the general public, as sick.

dirt
Enhanced by Zemanta

Tuesday, May 15, 2012

A Glimpse of the Degree of Ignorance and Arrogance Being Ejaculated From the Trans Community

From a recent message sent to me via here:
Since this is so chock full of ignorance and choking on the GSJ, I'll start at the beginning and work my way through rather than generalize. The ignorance starts in the very first sentence, when he tries telling me that men are masculine and women are feminine, ummm DUH! That my friend is a given. Next he ignorantly attributes Janice Raymond's Transsexual Empire to Greer who is obviously most noted for writing The Female Eunuch! He ignorantly or delusionary or both, claims that he as a biological male is both a lesbian and a feminist. He writes that all women arent feminine and that all men arent masculine, which clearly isnt true. Here again he is showing us just how far he has the GSJ's cock down his throat.

In the next paragraph he ignorantly claims that feminism is all about fluid identities, rather than dismantling the patriarchal structures that created and maintain the inequality among the sexes and quashing misogyny.

Then he whine's about women being able to freely "act masculine" but men cannot freely "act feminine". First, feminine and masculine arent things one can act out, they are merely physical characteristics of the male and female body. With regards to what he is saying under all his ignorance; historically women were not allowed to wear pants, pants tend to complicate easy rape. When small numbers of women began wearing pants, they were hounded, name called, beaten, some raped, and some arrested. Women being the stronger sex, persevered past the bullshit "three articles of "womens clothing" laws, past the arrests and rape by police and past societies harsh judgments. In the last few decades it has become common place to see girls/women in various kinds of pants. However, with the current hyper femininity campaign those harsh judgments and hassles are returning if the pants/tshirts females are sporting do not conform to hyper femininities rigid Gender Straight Jacketed standards per the Male Gaze. The short of it, this guy is angry because he, like most men who would like to freely sport clothes deemed "womens", is too afraid to wear them without claiming he's trans as he fears the consequences of his actions and is obviously too afraid to fight for his and other men's right to wear whatever they want.

Next is the same old bullshit about me "hating" trans people because he is too ignorant to comprehend what this blog is truly about/for. He, like anyone else who considers themselves trans need to hold onto the misogyny I'm working to ease, which is of course the foundation for the trans disorder. Then he ignorantly rewrites the history of Stonewall by attributing its beginnings to a male transitioner! Rather than the Butch lesbian (Marilyn Fowler) who started it and the gay men and lesbians who saw it through. We are seeing this trans revisionism rewriting our gay and lesbian history more and more. This is a critical area where gays and lesbians (whose histories barely exist anyways) need to stand up and set the record straight!

Next up he claims on one hand to want to speak "rationally" while in the same breath using the misogynistic "cis" nonsense! WHA?

Last in typical male privileged fashion he arrogantly presumes he and I want the same thing "love and happiness". When females at ages straight out of the nursery are hating themselves and their little bodies to the point of wanting to opt our of their perfect little female selves due to all the misogyny both graphic and subtle, "love and happiness" is the last fucking thing on my mind!

dirt
Enhanced by Zemanta

Sunday, May 13, 2012

Happy Mother's Day

This piece was written a few years ago:

The Mama Bear on the Ceiling

I cant exactly say when I first noticed the mama bear on the ceiling of my parents bedroom. Whether it was when I was really small and occupied that bedroom with them or later when I was just plain small and my mother was dying. Perhaps it was sometime in between. Whichever it was I did notice her, the mama bear on the ceiling.

I think the first time I paid her (the mama bear on the ceiling) any real mind was the first time my ma went into hospital. I didnt know why she went, I was told nothing. I only knew she was gone and I wanted her back. From the first night she was gone, my dad slept on the couch. He couldn't sleep in their bed without her. From the first night she was gone, I slept alone in their bed, because I couldn't sleep anywhere else. Each morning I slept in that bed, I awoke to the mama bear on the ceiling.

She of course wasn't a real bear, she was actually a water spot that my dad had painted over several times, and each time, she bled through refusing to leave. I remember staring and staring at her, wondering what her life was like. I knew she was a mama bear because she looked like a bear, kinda a teddy bear who was standing at a stove cooking, with a small baby bear standing beside her. She also had on an apron, so I knew she couldn't be a daddy bear. My dad always cooked on weekends, when he didnt work, and I never once remember him wearing an apron. I used to love when he made waffles. He made the best waffles ever! To be honest I've never tasted a waffle since. He is dead now too and out of my insane sense of morality I would never even try another waffle since it would be a waffle he didnt make. So yeah, the apron, the baby, the stove, the cooking, she was a mama bear. And because she was cooking for her baby, I knew she was a loving mama bear.

Sometime after my ma got out of hospital and everything was okay again, per usual we went "up north". We had a cabin a few hours north of where I grew up. It was a small red cabin trimmed in white, planted on three lots. My dad put in indoor plumbing so we would have a toilet and running water. When we first got the cabin we had an out house behind the cabin, painted red also and also trimmed in white. We had a water pump in front of the cabin. I have vague memories of enjoying using that old water pump, I thought it was right neato! Much more neat I thought than just turning on the tap. The outhouse however I could have done without! Spiders!!!!!

The cabin was located in this tiny tiny town called Dodge City, which was replicated to look like Dodge City. The small main strip was old western. Even had the places where you could tie your horse up, even though you rarely saw a horse. Our cabin was nearly right across from the main town strip. I loved running over to the local store there, Kernes, and getting candy. They had different candy than the stores I was used to. They also had, down the road from us a fancy gift shop which seemed out of place there. Everything there was rustic, indian, cowboy except this fancy gift shop with the lady owner. I never liked her, could tell straight away she didnt like kids. I remember she wore glasses, I think they made her seem even more brusque.

I went in there the friday we arrived and right off I saw this solid rubber bear! It was her. The mama bear on the ceiling! I wanted to buy it soooo bad! I had a whole dollar. I was quite spoiled then, I usually was given a dollar every day we were at the cabin. A lot of money for a 5 y/o old at the time. The year before that my dad bought me a red mini bike which he fashioned himself with training wheels! But I was five now and could ride it without. My brother had a dirt bike and a BB gun. We were both pretty spoiled. I checked the price of the mama bear, THREE DOLLARS!!! I felt a punch in my stomach, then my mind raced forward to comfort me with the idea that if I dont spend any money I would have enough sunday to buy the bear before we left to go back home. I calmed down. I had a plan.

Sunday came and I drove my little red mini bike down to the fancy gift shop to buy the mama bear. I was so excited and so happy. I took the bear back to our cabin and gave it to my ma. She seemed perplexed for a brief second, then said that it was so nice she was going to put it on the small shadow box that hung in the living room of the cabin along with her antique knickknacks. I felt very proud. We went back to my home town where my mother would die of cancer about six months later.

I dont know whatever became of the mama bear on the ceiling, nor the rubber mama bear I bought my ma. Which btw was the ONLY thing I ever bought my ma. They, like her exist now, only in my mind, except for where they now exist here, on the page.

dirt