Friday, January 20, 2012
Wannsee Conference
Labels:
Berlin,
Final Solution,
Holocaust,
Jewish Question,
Nazism,
Politics,
Wannsee,
Wannsee Conference
| Reactions: |
Wednesday, January 18, 2012
Joan of Arc
A bit behind, but an important birth/life to remember:
Along with a beautiful piece by Patti Smith and an equally beautiful photo of Falconett in her 1928 silent portrayal of Jeanne, in the Passion of Joan which is considered the greatest acting performance by any actor to date. And she did it all in silence.
dirt
Along with a beautiful piece by Patti Smith and an equally beautiful photo of Falconett in her 1928 silent portrayal of Jeanne, in the Passion of Joan which is considered the greatest acting performance by any actor to date. And she did it all in silence.
dirt
Labels:
Joan of Arc,
Patti Smith
| Reactions: |
Tuesday, January 17, 2012
Gender Variant=Gender Bullshit!
As we move from the conservative anti feminist post-queer gender fluid body politic toward the male medical machine's 2013 gender incongruence, we are encountering with a greater frequency the use of "gender variant" by both queer and medical groups alike. Gender Variant has been created to describe what queer/medical groups deem "behaviour or gender expression that does not conform to dominant gender norms of male and female".
The creation and implication of such a term only strengthens the already circumscribed notions of female and male/feminine and masculine. And by labeling behaviour as female/male/feminine/masculine we maintain an ignorant limited view of the sexes and preserve the limited possibilities for the sexes. Gender Variant also implies a difference where in truth, there is none. A female with short hair who works construction is still a female!
Female and male is simply what we are born, not what toys we play with, what colours we like, what clothes we wear or what careers we choose! Expand what it means to be female or male and toss in the nearest garbage bin where it belongs, gender variant, which only maintains the limits of who we are and what is possible for us based on our sex.
dirt
The creation and implication of such a term only strengthens the already circumscribed notions of female and male/feminine and masculine. And by labeling behaviour as female/male/feminine/masculine we maintain an ignorant limited view of the sexes and preserve the limited possibilities for the sexes. Gender Variant also implies a difference where in truth, there is none. A female with short hair who works construction is still a female!
Female and male is simply what we are born, not what toys we play with, what colours we like, what clothes we wear or what careers we choose! Expand what it means to be female or male and toss in the nearest garbage bin where it belongs, gender variant, which only maintains the limits of who we are and what is possible for us based on our sex.
dirt
Labels:
Antifeminism,
Female,
Gender,
Gender variance,
Genderqueer,
Male,
Transgendered
| Reactions: |
Sunday, January 15, 2012
A good Article on the Sexing of Toys/Clothes and Colours
See article here.
From the article:
"and I don't know if anyone has pointed this out before -- children are malleable, responding to the stimuli they are exposed to and the cues they are given"...thank you!
"This last point explains why many anti-feminists are so keen for toys to remain gendered: because if it's not really "natural" for boys to play with soldiers and girls to play dollies, then what other "natural" differences between the sexes (and the iniquities which arise from them) are no longer supportable? Perhaps it's not really "natural" for women to be under-represented on boards, or get paid less, or do more domestic chores even when they work the same hours as their male partners"....thank you again!!!!!!
dirt
From the article:
"and I don't know if anyone has pointed this out before -- children are malleable, responding to the stimuli they are exposed to and the cues they are given"...thank you!
"This last point explains why many anti-feminists are so keen for toys to remain gendered: because if it's not really "natural" for boys to play with soldiers and girls to play dollies, then what other "natural" differences between the sexes (and the iniquities which arise from them) are no longer supportable? Perhaps it's not really "natural" for women to be under-represented on boards, or get paid less, or do more domestic chores even when they work the same hours as their male partners"....thank you again!!!!!!
dirt
Labels:
Sexism,
The Gender Straight Jacket
| Reactions: |
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)



