1) Females who transition are NOT feminist.
2) Transition never ends. You will need to take drugs the rest of your life.
3) The drugs you take have no long term studies and have been linked to many different cancers.
3) You will never be male.
4) Dysphoria, body and sexual will return to a greater or lesser extent once the trans high wears off. More often than not, the dysphoria will become worse.
5) If you had depression issues before you began transition, like dysphoria, once the trans high wears off, depression will return.
6) Synthetic testosterone WILL change your personality. You will become a different person.
7) There is a good chance your sexual orientation WILL change.
8) All trans related surgeries will leave mutilative scars.
9) You will never escape your female biology. Your body, no matter the years on drugs, no matter the surgery, your body will continue in essential ways appearing and functioning as female.
10) You will lose your ability to feel deeply, including the ability to cry when needed. You will feel separated from your true self.
If you have other basic facts, leave them in the comments and I will add them.
dirt
Saturday, April 23, 2011
Friday, April 22, 2011
Trans-Keeping Gender Norms in Check
First homosexual caveman found
The male body – said to date back to between 2900-2500BC – was discovered
buried in a way normally reserved only for women of the Corded Ware culture
in the Copper Age.
The skeleton was found in a Prague suburb in the Czech
Republic with its head pointing eastwards and surrounded by domestic
jugs, rituals only previously seen in female graves.
"From history and ethnology, we know that people from this period took
funeral rites very seriously so it is highly unlikely that this positioning
was a mistake," said lead archaeologist Kamila Remisova Vesinova.
"Far more likely is that he was a man with a different sexual
orientation, homosexual or transsexual," she added.
According to Corded Ware culture which began in the late Stone Age and
culminated in the Bronze Age, men were traditionally buried lying on their
right side with their heads pointing towards the west, and women on their
left sides with their heads pointing towards the east. Both sexes would be
put into a crouching position.
So in the BC age when a male didnt conform to the male gender norms of the day, and instead chose to expand what was right for him in terms of male lovers and personal expression, it was ignorantly presumed he was womanish and treated, at least in this case, the way women were treated in death. Clearly these presumptions are homophobic, and what have we repeatedly established here is the foundation of homophobia, oh yeah, MISOGYNY.
And what happens to our Mr (potential) Homosexual when we fast forward to now? What great "progress" has our technological savvy male medical machine divined to describe a male whose (possible) sexual and or personal expressions fall outside the narrow gender norms still very firmly in place? He's a fag or a tranny!! WOW!!!!!!!!How far we have come! The leaps and bounds science and society have made is astonishing! And for science to conclude this man could have potentially been a "transsexual", illustrates just how deeply woven gender norms are threaded into us all.
The 21st century and things like clothing or behaviour are still dictating sex, the only difference between then and now is technology has advanced far enough to chemical mold and carve today's misfits into monsters of conformity, rather than advance itself to cherish the uniqueness's in all of us which is necessary to change society and each of us, for the better.
dirt
So in the BC age when a male didnt conform to the male gender norms of the day, and instead chose to expand what was right for him in terms of male lovers and personal expression, it was ignorantly presumed he was womanish and treated, at least in this case, the way women were treated in death. Clearly these presumptions are homophobic, and what have we repeatedly established here is the foundation of homophobia, oh yeah, MISOGYNY.
And what happens to our Mr (potential) Homosexual when we fast forward to now? What great "progress" has our technological savvy male medical machine divined to describe a male whose (possible) sexual and or personal expressions fall outside the narrow gender norms still very firmly in place? He's a fag or a tranny!! WOW!!!!!!!!How far we have come! The leaps and bounds science and society have made is astonishing! And for science to conclude this man could have potentially been a "transsexual", illustrates just how deeply woven gender norms are threaded into us all.
The 21st century and things like clothing or behaviour are still dictating sex, the only difference between then and now is technology has advanced far enough to chemical mold and carve today's misfits into monsters of conformity, rather than advance itself to cherish the uniqueness's in all of us which is necessary to change society and each of us, for the better.
dirt
Thursday, April 21, 2011
Wednesday, April 20, 2011
Hormone Blockers-The Future End of Homosexuality?
Children of 12 to be allowed gender drugs to prepare for sex change
"The controversial treatment halts puberty, stunting sex organs and preventing the growth of facial hair and sperm in boys, and breasts in girls".
"Doctors admit most children with the problem do not go on to have a sex change, often turning out to be gay. But blocking puberty hormones can make surgery easier if they need it".
Like the faux hormones the male medical machine doles out to the men and women transitioning, there are no definitive long term studies on how hormone blockers affect the mind and body other than in the most pedestrian ways. Add to that the children whom will be trans experimented on will and I quote "often (turn) out to be GAY"!
I'm reminded of the misogynistic changes we in the Butch/Femme community began seeing post queer theory which helped to create the self hating "male ID'd" Butches, butch wannabe's and ftMs as they started over running our community. At first the change began as an unspoken rule, but before long there was a mandatory verbal rule that every Butch/butch/ftM new member or old was to be addressed with "male pronouns", because "it is more of an insult to use a female pronoun on a male ID'd Butch/butch or ftM than to use a male pronoun on a Butch/butch comfortable with her femaleness". No, I kid you not.
But this is a lot worse than blatantly disrespecting females, it is even worse than the blazing homophobia/lezbophobia that underlines transgenderism. The hetero male medical machine thinks it more important to harm gay and lesbian children because a couple of them MIGHT wind up developing the trans disorder! And we all know which of those children will be targets for "hormone blockers", the most obvious who do not conform to narrow gender notions based solely on centuries of hetero patriarchy, i.e. Butch females and Queenie males. This very well could be a large step in the eradication of specific types of gays and lesbians in childhood through a form of gay/lesbian genocide.
It appears that the Harry Benjamin's and John Money's of the male medical machine are beginning to see some fruit from the trees they planted over half a century ago when they first had the idea that homosexuals could be heterosexualized by "changing" their "sex". Today as seen with these changes to NHS trans practices, like yesterday and all the days since, gay and lesbians are the ones to suffer most from the male medical machine. And for what? So that the few that MIGHT conform to gender norms can have an "easier" time of transition conforming.
For every gay and lesbian that has ever "supported" or stood idly by to the trans drugging and mutilation of our brothers and sisters, thank your fucking lucky stars you arent a gay or lesbian child today or the near future, because there is a good fucking chance, you would CEASE to exist!
Transition, the end of feminism and the future end of gays and lesbians.
dirt
"The controversial treatment halts puberty, stunting sex organs and preventing the growth of facial hair and sperm in boys, and breasts in girls".
"Doctors admit most children with the problem do not go on to have a sex change, often turning out to be gay. But blocking puberty hormones can make surgery easier if they need it".
Like the faux hormones the male medical machine doles out to the men and women transitioning, there are no definitive long term studies on how hormone blockers affect the mind and body other than in the most pedestrian ways. Add to that the children whom will be trans experimented on will and I quote "often (turn) out to be GAY"!
I'm reminded of the misogynistic changes we in the Butch/Femme community began seeing post queer theory which helped to create the self hating "male ID'd" Butches, butch wannabe's and ftMs as they started over running our community. At first the change began as an unspoken rule, but before long there was a mandatory verbal rule that every Butch/butch/ftM new member or old was to be addressed with "male pronouns", because "it is more of an insult to use a female pronoun on a male ID'd Butch/butch or ftM than to use a male pronoun on a Butch/butch comfortable with her femaleness". No, I kid you not.
But this is a lot worse than blatantly disrespecting females, it is even worse than the blazing homophobia/lezbophobia that underlines transgenderism. The hetero male medical machine thinks it more important to harm gay and lesbian children because a couple of them MIGHT wind up developing the trans disorder! And we all know which of those children will be targets for "hormone blockers", the most obvious who do not conform to narrow gender notions based solely on centuries of hetero patriarchy, i.e. Butch females and Queenie males. This very well could be a large step in the eradication of specific types of gays and lesbians in childhood through a form of gay/lesbian genocide.
It appears that the Harry Benjamin's and John Money's of the male medical machine are beginning to see some fruit from the trees they planted over half a century ago when they first had the idea that homosexuals could be heterosexualized by "changing" their "sex". Today as seen with these changes to NHS trans practices, like yesterday and all the days since, gay and lesbians are the ones to suffer most from the male medical machine. And for what? So that the few that MIGHT conform to gender norms can have an "easier" time of
For every gay and lesbian that has ever "supported" or stood idly by to the trans drugging and mutilation of our brothers and sisters, thank your fucking lucky stars you arent a gay or lesbian child today or the near future, because there is a good fucking chance, you would CEASE to exist!
Transition, the end of feminism and the future end of gays and lesbians.
dirt
Tuesday, April 19, 2011
More Hacking Attempts
Yet another weak hacking attempt at my email, at least this time I had things put in place so the IP was captured by Yahoo. Will keep you posted of developments.
Oh, and trying to hack an email account not associated with anything? Not a smart move genius.
dirt
Monday, April 18, 2011
Religion lies about women
A must read article: Religion lies about women
Some powerful quotes:
The truth is that the Abrahamic religions fear women and therefore go to extraordinary and sometimes brutal lengths to control them, constrain them, and repress them in every way. Show me a non-religious society that feels so threatened by the thought of female sexuality that it will slice off the clitoris of a young girl to ensure she can never experience sexual pleasure. Show me a non-religious society that feels the need to cloak women from head to toe and force them to experience the outside world through a slit of a few square inches. All three Abrahamic religions share the myth of Adam and Eve, the myth that it was through woman that evil was let loose in the world. They share the heritage of Leviticus, which declared a menstruating woman unclean, to be set aside, untouched, a revulsion that remains even today among some orthodox Jews, who will refuse to shake a woman’s hand for fear she may be menstruating. What kind of lunacy is this? It is the lunacy of a Bronze Age mindset fossilized by the reactionary forces of religion.
...And perish the thought that these religions – in their alleged equal valuing of women – should permit them actually to control their own bodies! Women exist for the purposes of reproduction! So let them reproduce! Let them reproduce, whether they wish it or not. Woe unto the woman who dares to engage in sex without being willing to conceive as a result! Woe unto the woman who uses contraception to control her fertility and manage the size of her family! And a hundred times woe unto the woman who actually dares to terminate a pregnancy she does not want! The question of abortion illustrates perfectly the role of women so far as the church is concerned. A woman’s reproductive organs are not her own, and she may not be permitted to decide what happens to them.
...In the eyes of the Abrahamic religions, the archetypal woman is Eve: disobedient, unreliable, easily led astray, and a seductive temptress of man – man being more noble, yet easy prey to the wiles and seductions of his weaker mate. Woman is the source of danger, the one who corrupts him, the conduit for all that is evil in the world. She is dangerous … yet irresistible; and this very irresistibility makes her more dangerous still. But you will notice that the dangers of sexual temptation are not to be faced equally by men and women: no, religion demands that it is the woman who bears the burden.
...Religion is one lie after another: the lie of original sin, the lie of eternal life, the lie of hell, the lie of answered prayer, the lie that life can have no meaning without religion, the lie that religion is the source of morality, the lie of creationism, the lie of a spy-in-the-sky who hears your every word and reads your every thought. And to this list we must add the lie that it views men and women as equal. It has got away for so long with the kind of lunatic word-games that allow death-by-torture to be presented as an act of love, and eternal torment in the flames of hell to be seen as a necessary act of justice, that we should perhaps not be surprised that it has also managed to dupe its followers into seeing the systematic suppression and silencing of women as an act of liberation and equality. Nevertheless, it is a lie, like all the others: a cynical and wicked lie. It is time women everywhere woke up to it.
dirt
Some powerful quotes:
The truth is that the Abrahamic religions fear women and therefore go to extraordinary and sometimes brutal lengths to control them, constrain them, and repress them in every way. Show me a non-religious society that feels so threatened by the thought of female sexuality that it will slice off the clitoris of a young girl to ensure she can never experience sexual pleasure. Show me a non-religious society that feels the need to cloak women from head to toe and force them to experience the outside world through a slit of a few square inches. All three Abrahamic religions share the myth of Adam and Eve, the myth that it was through woman that evil was let loose in the world. They share the heritage of Leviticus, which declared a menstruating woman unclean, to be set aside, untouched, a revulsion that remains even today among some orthodox Jews, who will refuse to shake a woman’s hand for fear she may be menstruating. What kind of lunacy is this? It is the lunacy of a Bronze Age mindset fossilized by the reactionary forces of religion.
...And perish the thought that these religions – in their alleged equal valuing of women – should permit them actually to control their own bodies! Women exist for the purposes of reproduction! So let them reproduce! Let them reproduce, whether they wish it or not. Woe unto the woman who dares to engage in sex without being willing to conceive as a result! Woe unto the woman who uses contraception to control her fertility and manage the size of her family! And a hundred times woe unto the woman who actually dares to terminate a pregnancy she does not want! The question of abortion illustrates perfectly the role of women so far as the church is concerned. A woman’s reproductive organs are not her own, and she may not be permitted to decide what happens to them.
...In the eyes of the Abrahamic religions, the archetypal woman is Eve: disobedient, unreliable, easily led astray, and a seductive temptress of man – man being more noble, yet easy prey to the wiles and seductions of his weaker mate. Woman is the source of danger, the one who corrupts him, the conduit for all that is evil in the world. She is dangerous … yet irresistible; and this very irresistibility makes her more dangerous still. But you will notice that the dangers of sexual temptation are not to be faced equally by men and women: no, religion demands that it is the woman who bears the burden.
...Religion is one lie after another: the lie of original sin, the lie of eternal life, the lie of hell, the lie of answered prayer, the lie that life can have no meaning without religion, the lie that religion is the source of morality, the lie of creationism, the lie of a spy-in-the-sky who hears your every word and reads your every thought. And to this list we must add the lie that it views men and women as equal. It has got away for so long with the kind of lunatic word-games that allow death-by-torture to be presented as an act of love, and eternal torment in the flames of hell to be seen as a necessary act of justice, that we should perhaps not be surprised that it has also managed to dupe its followers into seeing the systematic suppression and silencing of women as an act of liberation and equality. Nevertheless, it is a lie, like all the others: a cynical and wicked lie. It is time women everywhere woke up to it.
dirt
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)