Change Your World-NOT your Body

Monday, August 22, 2016

Unstraightening Lesbian: Removing the Heterosexual Lens: JoAnn Loulan

This joint post is yet another in our series about so-called "Lesbian Experts" who are neither lesbian nor expert.  

Today's offender is JoAnn Loulan, who has been hailed as a "lesbian sexpert". Loulan has published the following books: Lesbian Passion: Loving Ourselves and Each Other, The Lesbian Erotic Dance, and Lesbian Sex; which, according to Loulan's own website, "have together sold over 75,000 copies worldwide", which amounts to quite a huge chunk of lesbian change padding Loulan's heterosexual pockets.
In addition, Loulan has served as a so-called "lesbian expert", while specifically calling herself a "lesbian", on numerous panels, in addition to making appearances on television shows, including Oprah, Phil Donahue, and others, to peddle her phony wares.
However, there is a huge issue with calling JoAnn Loulan a "lesbian expert":

JoAnn Loulan is straight. 
Therefore, she is also, by definition, NOT an expert in lesbian matters.
After appropriating "lesbian" for her own purposes, misrepresenting lesbians, using lesbians, gaining fame from using the term "lesbian", and profiting from lesbians, JoAnn Loulan finally showed her true colors to the world by marrying a man.  (Or, rather, technically, we should say she married another man, because she had been married previously to a different man, before deciding to hijack Lesbian).
Loulan flippantly wrote off her responsibility to the lesbian community when confronted about her defaulting to her true Straightbian nature: "I'm proud of myself for telling the truth", she said...apparently too self-centered and myopic to realize that she has nothing to be proud of.  Her heterosexual "truth" is way too little and way too late.

JoAnn Loulan is much worse than the "sell-out" that she was accused of being at the time of her marriage to a man; rather, she is a shameless charlatan who seemingly does not even have the conscience to examine why what she has done to lesbians is wrong.

In fact, Loulan has not retracted her "lesbian" books despite her abandonment of lesbians; and she happily continues to list them on her website today.

As with our other offenders in this series, Loulan has published so very much erroneous drivel about lesbians that one post cannot possibly cover it all, so we will have to pick a few choice examples to illustrate Loulan's ignorance.

All of today's examples, below, of Loulan's wisdom horse manure come from the book The Lesbian Erotic Dance.

Let's start with Loulan's own story of her "coming out" deciding to use lesbians:
"As for myself, I am grateful that some lesbians like to bring straight women out...Many lesbians avoid bringing someone out -- in part for fear that she might go back to men..." (pp. 127-128). 

Ummm HELFUCKINLO!
 
Well, Loulan's own wording proves our point. Note that Loulan says "bring straight women out"; her subconscious is peeking through here, because the key word is STRAIGHT. (as in straight to the next dick!) Gee, we wonder why lesbians might worry that STRAIGHT women might go back to men?? Hmmmm...perhaps it is because they are STRAIGHT and that they WILL go back to men.

Thanks for proving our point for us, JoAnn Loulan! Very helpful! 

On to the next example of Loulan's flapdoodle, this time regarding the question of what makes someone a lesbian:
"...some women choose to be lesbians...It's a wonderful lifestyle..." (pg. 194)
Again, let's examine this carefully. Of course, Loulan would say that women "choose to be lesbians"...because, for her, it was indeed a (temporary) choice to pretend to be one. Also her breezy statement (Jimmy Stewart-inspired, no doubt) that "It's a wonderful lifestyle" is not only naive and incorrect, but also indicates copious amounts of straight privilege.

Being a lesbian is NOT a choice.  Being a lesbian is also NOT a "lifestyle", and it certainly isn't always a "wonderful" picnic in the park: sadly, even today, lesbians encounter discrimination, invisibility, oppression, misrepresentation, and violence.

Moving on to another example of Loulanesque truth-twisting and outright stupidity, this time with a quote involving Butches:
"Sue Golding discusses the range of butch sexuality. 'I think a lot of butches actually identify more with hermaphroditism.  They see themselves as being male and female...' " (pg. 126)
Even though Loulan is quoting another idiot (Golding), this quote is significant because Loulan saw fit to publish it. This one quote is so ludicrous that it almost would be laughable, except for the alarming foreshadowing of so many lesbians transitioning today.  We have Loulan and her pathetic cohorts to thank, at least in part, for destroying so many lesbian lives with such absurd notions as those voiced in this quote.

In another part of the book, Loulan talks about problems with how Femmes are seen in the lesbian community. While we agree that there are many misconceptions and problems with how Femmes are viewed/treated in the lesbian community, we wanted to specifically point out one of Loulan's statements:
"Some lesbians believe that femmes would be with men, except for some fluke, and that femme lesbians are women who have been lovers with men at different stages of their sexual lives. There is also the belief that these women are likely to go back to men at some point, betraying the lesbian sisterhood." (pg. 86)
Sadly, Loulan is right about this incorrect perception of Femme lesbians. Femme lesbians face widespread lack of acceptance and understanding from both within the lesbian community and in the general population.

But what Loulan fails to see, understand, and/or address is that obvious fact that she, JoAnn Loulan, and other lying poser Straightbians like her, have directly contributed to the misrepresentation and prejudice Femme lesbians face.

By perpetrating the outright deceit that she, JoAnn Loulan, herself is a Femme lesbian, many people, apparently blindly and unthinkingly, accepted her word about that.

So then when Loulan (predictably!!) goes back to men, because she NEVER was a Femme lesbian to begin with, Femme lesbians then are left to deal with the anger, suspicion, and confusion caused by a Straightbian.

Our next selected Loulan quote is along the same lines, indicating that Loulan is no more a lesbian than she is a wombat, and interestingly, ties into another offender in our current series, Pat/rick Califia:
"When Pat Califia circulated a survey within the lesbian community in San Francisco...there was a rumor that she was straight...I lecture to lesbians throughout the country, have been on television as an out lesbian, write articles and books in which I regularly talk about being a lesbian, and yet there is still a rumor that I am straight." (pg. 23)
Based on this quote and the surrounding sentences in this passage, Loulan obviously has her panties in a wad in this section, and seems determined to prove she is a "lesbian" by listing her appearances and publications.

Sorry to burst the delusional little bubble of Loulan and her accomplices, but writing books/articles and appearing on television and lecturing to real lesbians does not make you a lesbian, just as obtaining a Ph.D. and writing/lecturing about the strange sexual behaviors of a newly discovered marsupial does not make Dr. Andrew Baker a black-tailed antechinus.

The rumors about Loulan and Califia persisted because lesbian intuition and gaydar trumped their false claims.

In this book, Loulan uses many quotes gathered from her so-called "research" on the topic of lesbianism in general and Butch/Femme in particular. Of course, what she doesn't seem to realize is that the "research" is only as good as the "researcher", methodology, and subjects.

In Loulan's "research", questionnaires were distributed at various sites. These questionnaires measure only subjective self-report with absolutely no way to verify the accuracy of the subject's perceptions (or even whether some people completed the questionnaires with bizarre answers as a complete joke).

To further complicate matters, even the questions being asked were not based on any sort of valid or even objective criteria; for instance, Loulan asked respondents to rate themselves and their lovers on a 9-point "butch/femme scale".

Another unscientific question on this questionnaire asks subjects to rate themselves and their lovers as which of the following Goddesses: Artemis, Athena, Hestia, Hera, Demeter, Persephone, or Aphrodite. Because, well, apparently Loulan thought that Goddess information is certainly at the top of the hierarchy of lesbian concerns.

So, of course, all results should be taken with the proverbial grain of shit.

But since these results are considered to be integral in what Loulan is preaching about lesbianism, let's glance at a sample of the results:

1). According to Loulan on page 194, one-third of her sample "did choose their lesbianism".  In other words, then, one-third of her "lesbian" sample were not really lesbians.

2). According to Loulan on page 201, one-third of her sample "identified as either butch or femme". Butch/Femme are incredibly rare in the lesbian community, so this high percentage automatically raises a huge red flag that these self-reported results are inaccurate.

3). According to Loulan on page 202, "the constructs for a butch lesbian and a femme lesbian are different to the point of being almost as separate as two genders."  In case Loulan wasn't aware of this, Butch lesbians and Femme lesbians and ALL lesbians are female. We may express female differently but we are all female in every way.

4). According to Loulan on page 203:
"for three-fourths of the respondents, their ratings" (on the butch/femme scale) "changed according to different situations.
Sighing loudly.  Being Butch or Femme does not change according to an activity or what we are wearing, etc. If Loulan were a real Femme lesbian, or had she bothered to get to know real lesbians, she would have known this, and she would have realized her subjects were clueless as well. But since she is not, she blithely spreads misinformation.

5). According to Loulan on page 205:
"There is a good deal of speculation about what is a butch, femme or androgynous women. Many will say it is how she is built, how much she weighs. Some will say it has to do with how she walks or dresses. Still others believe that it has to do with an attitude in the world, and especially in lovemaking. When it comes to the sexual aspect of the discussion, there are pretty strong ideas that butches are aggressive and femmes are passive, while androgynous women believe in total equality." 
Again, Loulan is reporting the results of her survey, but these results only show her subjects' deep ignorance and confusion about the topic, as well as Loulan's own inability to understand even the basics of lesbian culture in general and Butch/Femme dynamics specifically.

6). For a final example amongst hundreds of potential examples, once again Loulan demonstrates that both her "research" and her knowledge of lesbian culture and B/F dynamics is severely impaired as demonstrated by the following quotes:
"When I say that there are no differences in this survey between butch, femme, and androgynous women, I mean that:
  • there are no significant differences in bed (though femmes penetrate their lovers more frequently than anyone else!)--not in orgasms, enjoyment, initiation, or other practices;...
  • there are no body types specifically associated with any one identity;
  • there's no correlation between motherhood and identity;..."
The truth about these "results" can be easily summarized as follows:  Wrong, wrong, and wrong again. Loulan wouldn't know a Butch or a Femme if we slapped her in the face, which is tempting, and her subjects apparently are equally uninformed.
In summary, JoAnn Loulan, like our other offenders in this series, is neither a lesbian nor an expert in lesbian matters.  She has no right to speak to, for, or about lesbians. The only place her lesbian books belong is in the garbage, where they can truly fester like the putrid refuse that they are, and the garbage is where both our copies ended up!

Mrs Dirt and Dirt

Share:

Friday, August 19, 2016

Unstraightening Lesbian: Removing The Heterosexual Lens: Rachel Pepper

This post is one in a series which will expose some of the biggest culprits among the so-called “Lesbian Experts” who are neither lesbian nor expert.  

Today’s subject, Rachel L. Pepper, is a longtime editor for the (allegedly) lesbian magazine Curve (which is rarely lesbian anymore), and a self-described "Blogger, award winning author, editor, and therapist". 

Pepper is also a known STRAIGHTBIAN who “supported” her lesbian partner right into transition, and she is currently using her LGBT expertise propaganda to make money by Pied-Peppering gay and lesbian children into transition. 

One of Pepper's early lesbian contributions money-makers was her book The Ultimate Guide to Pregnancy for Lesbians, because who better to tell lesbians how to make babies than a STRAIGHT woman? 

Even in her pregnancy book, allegedly written for lesbians, Pepper’s true Straightbian trans-promoting colors were already peeking through.  She often mentions so-called “lesbian partnerships” in which one partner is transitioning, breezily and annoyingly repeatedly referring to an FtM partner as a “tranny pop”.  

In chapter 2, she perkily exclaims that FtMs can get pregnant too; but without bothering to address the multiple health risks to the baby if testosterone is administered during the pregnancy.  

By chapter 3, Rachel’s true heterosexuality is on full display, when she writes, “If you’re like me, and spent your teenage years trying not to get pregnant with your male partners…”

In addition to the truckload of Straightbian garbage, one reviewer noted some startling medical inaccuracies in Pepper’s pregnancy book: 
"While Pepper’s support and encouragement are invaluable and her non-medical advice is excellent, there are some serious obstetrical inaccuracies here. For instance, Pepper describes the procedure of stripping the membranes to induce labor, as “pushing away the thin skin covering the cervix” (p.188). There is no skin covering the cervix. The procedure involves inserting a finger through the internal os of the cervix and then gently pushing away the amniotic sac.
On the same page, Pepper recommends notifying your physician immediately “if you haven’t noticed any fetal movements in a few days.” There is nothing “immediate” about a few days and a few days will be too late for a baby experiencing problems in the womb. After 32 weeks, ask your physician or midwife how to monitor your baby’s activity pattern."
Several Goodreads reviewers noticed Pepper’s incessant self-congratulatory, egocentric tone; her Straightbian ways of conceptualizing lesbian relationships; and other issues.  Here is a sampling of the reviews:
"Whenever she mentions any choice a lesbian might have to make in their path towards motherhood, she just can't resist interjecting what SHE did."
"My favorite piece of Rachel Pepper extraneous information about her specific family wisdom is when she suggests that warm milk is a perfectly good subsitute for coffee during pregnancy. It worked for her! And not only that, but her daughter Francis agrees, and still drinks it to this day! Seriously, Rachel Pepper, WHO CARES?!?"
"In the first chapter, her constant insertions of her own experiences are fine, but she literally cannot get through a single paragraph without talking about herself and her own experiences with motherhood. And this I believe is her unconscious intention in writing the book: she wanted the world to know about HER experiences as a mother. I mean, how could the landscape of lesbian pregnancy books possibly be complete without a book in which we see Rachel Pepper's perspective."
 and there's this ditty:
"If I could give this book less than one star, I would.
"The fact that so many of us end up reading (and worse, buying!) a book that has such little detailed information -- you could learn this much in 30 minutes online -- and so much denigration of non-gestational mothers (who apparently shouldn't breathe on the baby, lest nursing collapse, or consider themselves mothers -- "dyke daddy" is okay, though) is a testament to how few good books there are about lesbian parenthood. "

 and:
"You can tell what you're in for from the cover, which is of the midriff of a beautiful, smooth-skinned, white pregnant woman with a bare stomach and a sarong around her hips. By the end of reading it, I felt like if I read the words 'luscious pregnant body' one more time I was going to kill something."
"...there are some very annoying bits where she gives rather sententious and unwanted advice about finances (if you can't afford to get pregnant how can you afford to have a child?!?!??!?! FUCK YOU LADY, POOR PEOPLE CAN HAVE BABIES) and age (younger people shouldn't have babies! wait until you're in your late twenties and you're mature enough to be a parent! you might think you want to get pregnant but you don't know what you want!)."
"The book thinks it's inclusive but is wildly middle class and also occasionally outdated/clueless."
Pepper's STRAIGHTBIANism bleeds through the entire book:
"In numerous places, she, apparently unconsciously, uses quite demeaning and subtly inappropriate words, turns of phrase, and entire perspectives to describe the permanent partnerships that exist between many women and the wife/partner's role."
After reading copious reviews of Pepper's Lesbian Pregger book, what lesbian reviewers make clear is that this book was written by a STRAIGHTBIAN in a relationship with a trans female. Pepper merely uses Lesbian to ensnare readers (like she did her trans female partners prior to transition) lest we forget Lesbian funds.


After her foray into writing for lesbians in her true Straightbian fashion, Pepper’s perky nose quickly sniffed out a change in the winds of fortune and turned her contributions money-making efforts in the direction of the currently more profitable trans trend: writing books, making TV appearances, and Peppering (get it?) Curve Magazine (supposedly a lesbian publication, with “supposedly” being the key word) with her trans-related propaganda.  
In summary, Rachel Pepper is not a lesbian, and she is certainly not an expert in lesbian affairs.   She is currently undermining lesbians, as well as gay/lesbian children, by pushing her clear trans agenda, and she is being enabled to do so by a magazine that purports to be for and about lesbians.  When called out on her true agenda, in true Straightbian privileged fashion, she passive-aggressively responds using thesame lesbian magazine as her platform. Rachel, wake up! If you worked better at helping Kellen Bennett-Grayson (or whatever s/he is calling herself these days) get a REAL job you wouldnt fucking need dyke dollars!

We see who and what you really are, Rachel Pepper. It is way past time that lesbians stop forking over our hard-earned cash to you, and to the publishers and magazine who support your agenda.  Get a new hobby, Rachel Pepper, because in the eloquent words of one reviewer of your lesbian work, Seriously, Rachel Pepper, WHO CARES?!?”

Dirt and Mrs Dirt
 

Share:

Tuesday, August 16, 2016

UnStraightening Lesbian-Removing the Heterosexual Lens-Patrick Califia-Sexual SICKO!

In our second UnStraightening Lesbian piece, we focus our attention on the VERY pedo/misogynistic/sado disturbed and VERY NON lesbian Pat aka Patrick Califia. We begin the sick treacherous road into Califia with a quote from NAMBLA's pro-pedophile website:
"Boy-lovers and the lesbians who have young lovers are the only people offering a hand to help young women and men cross the difficult terrain between straight society and the gay community. They are not child molesters. The child abusers are priests, teachers, therapists, cops and parents who force their stale morality onto the young people in their custody. Instead of condemning pedophiles for their involvement with lesbian and gay youth, we should be supporting them."
    ~ Pat Califia, lesbian author and activist,
    in The Advocate, October, 1980.
Pat Califia has LONG been discussed/published/quoted/celebrated and otherwise known (prior to transition) as a LESBIAN writer. Califia is MOST certainly NOT a dyke and as for being a writer (subtracting quality) we may consider her that. I recall in my gay 20's seeing Califia routinely published in so called lesbian magazines etc, even then it was obvious from her writing alone she wasnt a lesbian anymore than was her writings were ground breaking; piss poor poetry coupled with forced fisting fictions (or non fictions as the case may be).

Before publishing in the lesbian presses Califia along with warped STRAIGHTBIAN lezzie poser Gayle Rubin pooled their perversions into Samois, the first lesbian BDSM organization for sexually used/abused STRAIGHTBIANS/bisexuals and the just plain odd to meet/great and get down and dirty. It is through Samois that Califia specifically honed her cunt hating craft.

Califia was first taken up by the Lesbian press when she put out Sapphistry: The Book of Lesbian Sexuality. Again, like Susie (not so) Bright, we have a sexually disturbed/screwed up straight woman, DICKtating lesbian sex to lesbians! While this book didnt reveal how disturbed Califia was (is), it did reveal she didnt know the first thing about lesbian relationships nor the sex that occurs between lesbian lovers.

Another of her lesbian successes came in the form of the fictive shorts, Macho Sluts collection. Each short story giving testament to Califia's pure hatred for the female sex, lesbian or otherwise.
 
Vaginal rape, anal rape, rape with fists/arms, rape with whips and as it figures in multiple stories her personal favourite enema rapes. Lesbians being beaten, cut, sliced, forced to drink their own piss, bound, gagged, canned and immobilized. Lesbians choked while they have a dildo shoved down their throats. Lesbians begging and pleading to their "daddy" to either stop what they're doing or to do more of whats being done. Lesbians whose inner dialogue before being raped by several police officers is she really does love cock:
REAL Lesbians do not only NOT figure in anything Califia wrote, REAL lesbians DO NOT WANT TO BE RAPED OR FUCKED BY ANY MALE and for that matter raped by anybody! Califia's SICKO fiction is just that, SICK! It isnt feminist, it isnt lesbian and it isnt subversive, its subhuman and it reveals MORE about its writer than it EVER could about the women (lesbians) it claims to represent!

If you arent convinced of Califia's penchant for the perverted, bear in mind her pedophile predilections that she (their only female issue) published in the now defunct Paidika-The Journal of Paedophilia, NAMBLA and any other twisted kidster zine. Califia says in her Paidika article regarding child porn:
"it would be a mistake to characterize all child porn as “a record of child abuse.” Sometimes it was a record of children's exhibitionism and free erotic play with one another. Sometimes it was a record of adolescent vanity, pride, and budding sexuality. Sometimes it preserved a moment of exceptional trust and pleasure between partners whose ages would normally have kept them apart."
 Califia goes on to minimize the number of missing and sexually abused children: (Perhaps we could arrange a sit down between Califia and John Walsh?)
"The campaign against child pornography was fueled by related moral hysteria over missing children. During the early '80s, the American media was full of melodramatic accounts of the “millions” of children who were kidnapped and then sexually abused by strangers"
 Califia further enlightens us on what lesbian feminist's sexually desire and do with lesbian children/youth:

"American society has become rabidly phobic about any sexual contact between adults and minors. In this social climate, very few lesbians will admit to having cross-generational relationships or defend even the abstract idea of them. Within the lesbian community, other forces exist (spaceships/laser beams?) that prevent girl-lovers and underage lesbians from telling their own stories. We encourage incest survivors to break the silence and tell family secrets about violence and sexual abuse. But this sisterly support turns to outrage and cries for silence if a woman wants to talk about being a sexually active child or even a teenager who was not traumatized by the experience. (Honey, trust me, YOU were/are seriously traumatized) Lesbian-feminism supposedly empowers women, but we are reluctant to see young women's sexual experiences as anything but victimization.

Lesbians work constantly to undo their racism, classism, able-bodyism, looksism, coupleism. and all other forms of prejudice. We give lip service to confronting ageism, but we do not really include underage lesbian and bisexual women in our community. The simple truth is that we are afraid to. We are afraid the state will come down on us, brand us as child molesters (NOT US honey, just YOU), and put us in jail."
In conclusion, Califia never was a lesbian, not before she transitioned (identifying with her abuser/s), nor since. What is painstakingly obvious is Califia was sexually abused by family, perhaps by church (Mormon). But rather than work through those horrors, become a healthy woman who managed to survive child sexual abuse, write and maybe reach other women, Califia glamorized and glorified her abuse under Lesbianism! And worse, harmed and tortured other women in the name of Lesbianism!

Her pedestrian pornofied perversions were published in Lesbian presses, taking up money and space where REAL lesbian authors should have been published! What happened to those lesbian writers whose stories and novels got chuffed aside for Califia's pedophilic pleasure principles?
"At 45, I was terrified of changing my gender, afraid it would mean that I'd no longer be able to make a living, since my income was based on being a lesbian therapist and journalist."
How many Lesbian owned and operated bookstores closed because lesbians werent interested/could not relate to the filth and garbage published by so-called dyke presses these bookstores felt they should carry? I suspect like so-called lesbian magazines today (Curve/Diva), most were ran by warped/damaged STRAIGHTBIANS. Women who have the money/clout and straight privileges to call what they're doing lesbian, write about it, publish it and get praised as ground breaking lesbian works.

We hope LESBIAN readers of this series are starting to notice a pattern of behaviour, some common threads run through each woman featured in this series. We also want to make mention, we're not prudes, nor do we think or believe any lesbian should be, therefore we hope we drew a distinct line between playful kink and violent or pedophilic perversions.

Mrs Dirt and Dirt

 
Share:

Sunday, August 14, 2016

UnStraightening Lesbian-Removing the Heterosexual Lens-Susie Bright

In our recent post Unstraightening Lesbian: Removing the Heterosexual Lens, we discussed 4 (alleged) "Lesbian Experts" who are neither lesbian nor expert, and we gave teasers for each of our first 4 offenders. These posts will shine a spotlight on one of these offenders, and this one is particularly guilty.

Today's subject, Susie Bright, is single-handedly responsible for disseminating a plethora of misinformation to the public, as well as to lesbians ourselves. She has written and said sooo much ridiculousness that it will be difficult to confine this critique to a single post, but we will, because she does not deserve any more attention than she has already stolen from real lesbians.
Susie is a self-proclaimed "lesbian sexpert" and, in fact, she wrote a book entitled "Susie Sexpert's Lesbian Sex World" (hereafter referred to as SSLSW), essentially a collection of essays which first appeared in various publications, which explains the book's unevenness and lack of apparent purpose (other than a format to brag about her sexual prowess/expertise and her blinding fabulousness, that is).

There's enough nonsense in this one book alone to write a dissertation about, so we will have to focus on the worst of the worst factual errors and egregious lies about lesbian life.

To begin with, the premise that Susie Bright is in any way a "lesbian expert" is a gargantuan fallacy, because she is not a lesbian.  She herself states on her website that she is "bisexual", and that she has lived with her male partner for approximately 25 years, in other words, she LOVES the cock.

However, this little factoid does not appear in SSLSW until the very latter chapters; prior to the very end of the book, she refers to herself and her activities as "lesbian" or "dyke", with no hint that she really LOVES dick until the very end.

Susie, who is, as we now know, a non-lesbian aka STRAIGHTBIAN, was also was a contributor (and editor-in-chief from 1984 until 1991) of On Our Backs (OOB) magazine, which proclaimed itself to be "Entertainment for the Adventurous Lesbian", and Susie now describes OOB as "an influential and remarkable part of lesbian, feminist, and publishing history".
So, with the blurb of Susie's (non)qualifications as a "lesbian expert" covered, let's turn now to her infamous book, SSLSW, for (non)wisdom on the lesbian experience.  The following is just a very small sampling of the insanity, so we tried to pick out the most absurd for your reading (dis)pleasure.

In her chapter entitled "Pack It Up, I'll Take It", Susie (along with help from her buddy and fellow quack "Fanny Fatale",who will be featured in a later post), assert the following preposterous claims:
"There are butches who dress in feminine clothing because it turns them on...Half the lesbians in the sex industry as erotic dancers or prostitutes are butches." 
First of all, real Butches are incredibly rare and it is very likely that Susie has never even seen one. (Having short hair does not make someone Butch, although it makes millions of dykes falsely claim to be Butch). Secondly, no real Butch would ever "dress in feminine clothing" (for a turn-on or for any other reason); furthermore, a real Butch would literally die before she worked as a prostitute or a stripper. Sorry, Susie and Fanny, you batted zero there.

In the chapter entitled "Get Into The Group", Bright claims incorrectly:
"There is a whole generation of dykes who first made love to a woman as part of a ménage à trois with a man."
Perhaps the most offensive chapters (although it is admittedly a very close race!) in the book is entitled "How To Stuff a Wild Lesbian Bikini: A Survey of Lesbian Erotica" with a list of Susie's opinions of the best "lesbian" erotica. (The key word here is "lesbian", but as you will soon see, Susie's list is about as far from lesbian as it is possible to get).

Here is a small sampling of her vomitous, non-lesbian reading recommendations:

#10). There is an insurmountable problem with this example: Lesbians are female, and should never be referred to as "he":
 
#11). There is a fatal flaw with #11: It was written by contributor to pedophile Paidika Journal Pat Califia.  Need we say more?

#12).  There is an unbelievably obvious problem with this story: Lesbians do not want cock.  We don't want to have one, and we don't want anything whatsoever to do with a dick. Ergo, lesbians do not want to read anything entitled "A Short Story About A Penis" by STRAIGHTBIAN Sarah Schulman!


#15).  There are so many problems with this one that we will leave it at "Huh?":
In the chapter entitled "Over The Dam", Susie talks about AIDS in the lesbian community.  While we agree with providing safe sex education, Susie's musings on the lesbian community in this chapter is not only cuckoo, it is the sort of fictitious fabrication that contributes to heterosexual men thinking that they have a snowball's chance in Hell of getting into a lesbian's bed. It also REEKS of a warped jealousy of true lesbians being (still) the lowest risk for HIV and lowest group who've contracted HIV which Susie tries to twist otherwise. The statement below also makes clear Susie does not view herself as a real lesbian since lesbians are "pure-as-the-driven-snow" and Susie is not.

This should go without saying, but sadly, Susie is forcing us to state the obvious: Lesbians do not have sex with men.  
Susie, you obviously love dick, therefore you are not a lesbian. LESBIANS DO NOT WANT DICK. LESBIANS DO NOT WANT MEN EVEN IF THEIR DICK FELL OFF. LESBIANS ARE NOT EMOTIONALLY/PHYSICALLY/SPIRITUALLY ATTRACTED TO MALES! This isn't rocket science, people. Lesbians love women.

In summary, Susie Bright is not a lesbian and therefore has no right to speak for and about lesbians. She has repeatedly promoted outright falsehoods to and about lesbians.  She has made a fortune off of her nonsensical tales and she continues to make money off of us/LESBIANS to this day.
Susie, you're not as bright as you think you are. It's WAY past time to get off our backs!

Dirt and Mrs Dirt

Share:

Saturday, August 13, 2016

Trans Trending-Who is Transitioning

 
Charlie Age 15

Ell Age Teen

Des Age 21

Jax Age Youth

Oli Age Child

Lex Age 20

Ash Age Teen

Zan Age 18

Fel Age ?

Mrs Dirt recently received this comment from a trans female who wanted to post here but wasnt sure which post was most appropriate. I'm posting her (Bartek's) comment in full here as it is oriented toward Trans Trenders: (I put in a few remarks in red)

Hello,

At first, sorry for my English, I’m not a native speaker. If I sound rude – keep in mind it was not my intention.

I know this may be not a correct place to post this comment since it’s not related to comment policy, but honestly, I have no idea where I should write it. I just want to leave a feedback on yours and Dirt’s general work. I’m not sure if there’s a point of re-posting it on Dirt’s blog, I guess you two talk about what happen on your blogs? (We do!)

Anyway: I’m myself a FtM and (heh, it will sound like heresy, right?) recently I thought what you two were doing was really important. Don’t get me wrong, I have no regrets nor I deny the existence of transgenderism, so while I don’t agree with your basic statement, I still think you made some good points.

First of all I really appreciate Dirt’s posts about testosterone injection’s influence on female body. I regret most of the FtMs (trans females) will be to busy with sending hate messages to actually read theses posts.😛 Have you ever think of anonymously sending them rewritten in friendlier way to some transgender site? Most of trans-people perceive Dirt as their biggest enemy and don’t care what she has to say, but she’s saying things that doctors are unwilling to say. Of course, by this way you won’t change anyone view on transgenderism, but maybe some people WILL read it and be more cautious about their health. Honestly, some of the girls and boys on tumblr and other weird places talk about hormones as if they were candies with no side effects…

Also – I noticed the same things as you did. This is becoming a trend. A couple of weeks ago I talked with a girl, who claimed to be a pre-everything transboy. She told me she has started to be transgender (?) when she realized she’s in love with a gay. I wish it was an isolated case but 95% of the “trans” people I met seem to be completely mindless about what and why they are doing, fetishists or deeply damaged, self hating people.

There’s a short story I’d like to tell you, I think you’ll find it interesting. One popular trans activist in my country some time ago decided to detransition. She discovered she can truly enjoy her female self, found a love and stopped HRT. Probably in another order, though.😛 Anyway I felt happy for her and I thought everyone else will react the same but… no. The amount of hate she got was terrifying. If people could they would instantly burned her alive. She didn’t even started to be critical about transition in general, she just said she has chosen the wrong path and found the right one. I don’t know, why would anyone who is ‘mindful’ about what they are doing react so angrily?

Anyway I don’t agree with many of your opinions, but I think your voice should be heard and analyzed, not silenced by people who are trans, think they’re trans or just pretend to be.

I guess I should post it on Dirt’s blog after all, since she’s more focused on gender critical (did I use the correct term?) activity, but I noticed she really like to have her place well organized and is not found of off-topic comments. And as I said, this is really off-topic.😛

Have a nice day.
 dirt
Share:

Tuesday, August 9, 2016

UnStraightening Lesbian-Removing the Heterosexual Lens (a series)

Mrs. Dirt and I are writing another joint post, due to our mutual passions about the importance of the topic and our mutual experiences. Because of the potential to write an entire book on the subject (maybe later) we're going to do a series of posts in effort give a fuller focus on the subject and the women discussed. In this post we'll begin with a brief overview of the topic, followed by a list of a few of our topic's offenders, and under each offender we'll supply a teaser explaining while each woman is on our list. Each teaser will give the reader a taste of what is to come when we do a full post on each heterosexual culprit.

The subject Mrs. Dirt and I are tackling has affected decades upon decades of lesbians right into each and every lesbian alive today. As lesbians, we're all born and function as outlaws in a Heterosexual Society. As women, we have little power, and as lesbians we have less. Lesbians do not have male privilege nor the privilege gained from sleeping with/marrying men nor the privileges heterosexual women enjoy even when single. Even being a lesbian is not something we can simply choose not to be or in the case of the privileged straight women, choose not to DO. Lesbianism is NOT a set of behaviours, it is a birth right, or in our case, in current heterosexual society, we are viewed as a birth wrong.

That said, because lesbians do not have the power or the privileges to effect even the very notion of what a lesbian is or isn't, does or doesn't, Lesbianism itself has been defined/forged by STRAIGHTBIANS and other heterosexual women. Because Lesbianism has been filtered (watered down) through a heterosexual lens, lesbians ourselves have a false sense of who we are and where we come from.

What Mrs. Dirt and I are doing in this series of posts is focusing on the STRAIGHT female lesbian experts who have written/documented a pantyhose strained lesbian herstory and lesbian sexuality as defined by them-STRAIGHT women! We will show how Lesbian has been so tarred and feathered by these purported experts that lesbians ourselves recognized so little of our feelings and stories, many of us thought Is there something wrong with me or Am I a lesbian then?

These posts will shine a spotlight on how the experts  heterosexualized lesbianism, warped communities of lesbians, and has HEAVILY assisted in the astronomical number of lesbians transitioning. Nothing happens in a vacuum and by golly Mrs. Dirt and I are finally going to set some false records STRAIGHT!

While we certainly cannot address every inconsistency heterosexuals have attributed to lesbians/being a lesbian, we are going to address a few choice prime STRAIGHT female culprits in this post and in future posts whose books/lectures/high profiles/interviews etc have damaged generations of lesbians, beginning with how we saw ourselves and how heterosexual society has viewed us.

Before we get started with our first STRAIGHT culprit of Crimes Against Lesbians, let us preface by saying before the question "how do you know these women are straight?" is even asked, the answer lies (where it is not immediately obvious) in how their information is interpreted/disseminated. One thing both gays and lesbians have specific to us is a distinct language and a distinct way of communicating that language which has served as one of the few survival tools available to homosexuals, ensuring our survival AND ensuring we find each other. It may be subtle, but it is NOT heterosexual! Another reason is the INTENSE focus on the sexual, usually involving pedophilia play/BDSM. 

Without further ado and in no particular order, here are our first batch of offenders:
 1) Joann Loulan has been hailed a lesbian (butch/femme) "sexpert", selling books to over a hundred thousand lesbians, delivering well paid for speaking engagements, including being featured on Oprah. Such books include: Lesbian Passion/ Lesbian Sex/ The Lesbian Erotic Dance. Despite making a fortune and earning the trust of lesbians, Loulan got caught with her pants down-she married a MAN! Loulan said of homosexuality later on: 
“Why is everybody freaking out about it being a choice? It’s a great choice,” Loulan says. “I don’t know why the genetics argument is going to help us. It didn’t help blacks. I think it is a pathetic argument to say ‘I can’t help it.’ I don’t think it exists for everybody, and I don’t think it matters.”
Loulan, who clearly admits to not even believing in homosexuality at all was a leading lesbian voice for lesbians, to lesbians, about lesbians and to STRAIGHT society! 

 2) Rachel L. Pepper is a longtime editor for the lesbian magazine Curve (which by the way is rarely lesbian anymore) and a self-described "Blogger, award winning author, editor, and therapist". One of Pepper's early lesbian contributions money-makers was her book The Ultimate Guide to Pregnancy for Lesbians, and who better to tell lesbians how to make babies than a STRAIGHT woman! Pepper is a known STRAIGHTBIAN who supported her lesbian partner right into transition! And she is now using her LGBT expertise to make money by Pied Peppering gay and lesbian children into transition

A very telling Pepper quote from her lesbian pregnancy book says it all:
"If you're like me and spent your teenage years trying not to get pregnant with your male partnerS..." pg 29 UGTPFL
3) Patrick Califia according to herself is an "author, therapist, sex radical, therapist, bear, pagan, top but not stupid" (She put therapist in twice, but she isn't stupid!). Pat Califia, prior to transition, claimed to be a Lesbian, a Butch lesbian, and a whole lotta other kinds of lesbian. She authored first Sapphistry: The Book of Lesbian Sexuality with a focus on Butch/Femme sexuality/BDSM as if the two were on a continuum, which, by the way, they most certainly are NOT!
I can’t resist the call of that
Deep, smoldering anger,
the girlboy who can never forgive herself
Until Mama relents and says
(Standing in a dark doorway,
Spraying herself with a perfume atomizer),
“Forget the old man.
Come to my bed tonight.”
Her warped heterosexuality shines through her lesbian sex writings as well as her transgendered work, all culminating in an orgasm of pedophilic perversion.

4) Susie Bright aka Susie Sexpert is a STRAIGHTBIAN who has or tried to DICKtate her VERY damaged and warped and SICK heterosexualized version of dyke sex since the 1980s. Bright's copious lesbian stories, lesbian pictorials, lesbian advice, lesbian articles and lesbian interviews have not only confused and disgusted generations of dykes, Bright has been paid (and paid well) for occupying Lesbian spaces/presses when doing so. Bright is largely consumed with sex and telling anyone who will listen what "lesbians do in bed", which of course she as a STRAIGHTBIAN would not know! Due to the overwhelming amount of lesbian ignorance/misinformation Bright has supplied, we're hard pressed to leave you with just one teaser quote so here are the best:
"AIDS also inspired great dread among dykes because it exposed the fact that the majority of lesbians had had some intercourse with men since the epidemic started. In fact, lesbians at that time were more likely to have sex with "high risk men"-- ie, gay or bi men-- than exclusively straight women were."

"We decided to do an article about dykes digging gay porn, and Honey Lee shot our first pictorial with a real PENIS... two gay guys doing it on the floor while Kitty and BC watched"

"Not long after that story, we ran the first lesbian story about female to male transsexuality, and Loren Cameron and Justin Green posed for Honey Lee again. I had no idea what a huge story that would end up being...how many women would be inspired and touched by their words."

In summary, here is the first group of the Most Offensive. Those presented here today are the tip of the proverbial iceberg of so-called "lesbian experts" who are neither lesbian nor expert. Future posts will reveal others, and you are invited to submit your suggestions. We will do full posts on the fab four before moving on to the next group.

Until lesbians are willing to wake up and see that we are being led around by the nose hairs by people who do not have our best interests at heart, we will remain vulnerable. Identifying the factors, and the people, that have led us to this point is the first step to reclaiming what is rightfully ours. LESBIAN!

dirt and Mrs. Dirt

Share:
Copyright © The dirt from Dirt | Powered by Blogger
Design by SimpleWpThemes | Blogger Theme by NewBloggerThemes.com | Distributed By Blogger Templates20