Monday, June 20, 2016

Dr. John Money and the THEORY of Gender Identity-A Postmortem (Part 1)

This post begins a series of posts on but not limited solely to: John Money, Alfred Kinsey, the theory of Gender Identity (gender roles), all incarnations of the DSM's pro consensual pedophile position. In this post I will focus on the John Hopkin's sexologist Dr. John Money, responsible for the theory (and promotion) of Gender Roles/Gender Identity (disorder)/consensual pedophilia. I will show with irrefutable proof that while the theory of Gender Identity was proven false as early as the mid 70's, the theory of Gender Identity was allowed to proliferate as both a means to normalize some paraphilias (cross dressing/homosexuality) and open the door for the future normalization of pedophilia.

John Money was born in New Zealand in 1921. Money later went to Victoria University, double majoring in philosophy and psychology.
In 1947, At the age of 26, Money left for the US to pursue his doctorate which he later received in 1952 from Harvard. It was while Money was studying at Harvard that he became heavily interested in hermaphroditism and sexology. From Harvard, Money went to John's Hopkins, founding the
Office of Psychohormonal Research. It is during his early years (the 1950s) at John's Hopkins that Money, through his fixation with the intersex, particularly "fixing" infants with ambiguous genitalia, that Money helped to develop the Gender of rearing model for infants intersex or presumed intersex.
  • The basic idea was that each child’s potential for a “normal” gender identity should be maximized by making each child’s body, upbringing, and mind align as much as possible. Because of the belief that it was harder to surgically engineer a boy than a girl, most children with intersex were made as feminine as possible, utilizing surgery, endocrinology, and psychology. A “successful” patient was one judged to be stable and “normal” (i.e., heterosexual) in the assigned gender. (In an era of vice squads raiding gay bars, it is not surprising that homosexuality appeared to most of these professionals an untenable identity.)
In working (altering/fixing) with intersex (children-adults) Money came to believe (theorize) that we all possess (what he called) a gender identity independent of our biological sex and IF the gender identity is socially constructed (via parents/family etc) by age two 1/2, the human, regardless of biological sex can and will function as the socialized gender ("sex of rearing could transcend external genital morphology" JM-supra note 52, at 336).
  • From the sum total of hermaphroditic evidence,” he (John Money) wrote in 1955, “the conclusion that emerges is that sexual behavior and orientation as male or female does not have an innate, instinctive basis. In place of a theory of instinctive masculinity or femininity which is innate, the evidence of hermaphroditism lends support to a conception that, psychologically, sexuality is undifferentiated at birth and that it becomes differentiated as masculine or feminine in the course of the various experiences of growing up.” In short, Money was advancing a view that human beings form a sense of themselves as boy or girl according to whether they are dressed in blue or pink, given a masculine or feminine name, clothed in pants or dresses, given guns or Barbies to play with. Many years later, Money would describe how he arrived at some of his more radical theories about human sexual behavior. “I frequently find myself toying with concepts and working out potential hypotheses,” he mused. “It is like playing a game of science fiction.”

Meaning, if a baby was born male, but raised as a girl socially (think pink), the biological male would believe/function comfortably as a girl/woman, granted this mutable gender identity theory was born out of RARE intersex births ONLY.

John Money's other obsession developed after he became aware of the autogynephile/transsexual Christine Jorgensen, whose sex reassignment (in its early stage) was considered a success. Transsexuals peaked Money's interest, but like most (even today) studying transgenderism, Money never bothered with the follow up to realize Jorgensen's transition was a failure socially and medically, as he later died prematurely from multiple organ cancers.

John Money then went on a crusade:
  • " establish Johns Hopkins as the first hospital in America to embrace transsexual surgeries, Money knew that he would first have to bring on board a respected medical man. (Money himself was a psychologist and did not possess a medical degree of any kind.) He turned first to Dr. Howard Jones, the Johns Hopkins gynecologist who had perfected the surgical techniques for sex assignment on Money’s infant intersexual subjects. “I can recall,” Jones says, “that for a number of months, maybe even years, John kept raising the question of whether we shouldn’t get into the transsexual situation.”
Dr. Jones was uncomfortable performing surgeries on non intersex persons, so Money turned to the godfather of transsexualism Harry Benjamin, with Benjamin's help Money garnered John Hopkins to open the FIRST clinic in America (1965) for the medical treatment of transsexuals, named by John Money himself as the Gender Identity Clinic. Clearly Money's own warped psychosexual predilections fueled his lifelong obsession with intersex/transsexuals "I suffered from the guilt of being male...I wore the mark of man’s vile sexuality”—that is, the penis and testicles"..."I wondered if the world might really be a better place for women if not only farm animals but human males also were gelded at birth." Interestingly, despite Money's Gender Identity theory, gender identity MUST be forged by age 2 1/2 for success (according to Money), he completely ignored his theory where transsexuals were concerned. He also had no way to actually prove his Gender Identity theory, because of the ethical violations for experimenting on children. A medical mistake that occurred in 1966 in the form of a botched circumcision, would change all that for Dr. Money, Women's Lib (Radical Feminism) and Transgender as we know it today.

Because John Colapinto's book As Nature Made Him documents a thorough account of David Reimer's tragic story, for the purposes of this post I will supply simply the basics. In 1965 a set of male identical twins (Bruce and Brian) were born to Ron and Janet Reimer. Eight months after their birth they were to receive a routine circumcision, and instead the first twin operated on (Bruce) was horrible mutilated:
  • " It was blackened, and it was sort of like a little string. And it was right up to the base, up to his body.” To Ron the penis looked “like a piece of charcoal. I knew it wasn’t going to come back to life after that.”Nevertheless, Janet asked the urologist, “Will it still grow, and he’ll just have a little penis?” The doctor shook his head. “I don’t think so. That’s not the way it works.” Over the next few days, baby Bruce’s penis dried and broke away in pieces. It was not very long before all vestiges of the organ were gone completely.
Bruce's penis was irreparably damaged and his young, naive, frightened parents didnt know what to do or where to turn. Ten months later, by pure accident they saw a program featuring John Money speaking about Gender Identity and his successes with both intersex and transsexuals. It was not long before the Reimers were in touch with Money, whom felt as though he hit a jackpot, not only could he prove his Gender Identity theory on having Bruce raised as a girl, BUT Bruce was an experimenters dream, he had an identical twin, Brian. It didnt take long for Money to convince Ron and Janet that Bruce could and should (for his own good) be raised as a girl. The outcome of this case would prove once and for all that it was nurture more than nature that shaped male and female behaviour, or so John Money claimed. 

Brenda, as Bruce was renamed to suit his/her NEW Gender Identity and was soon surgically butchered in order to get the toddler ready for later surgeries that would carve a hole in his body to function as a penis pleaser for his/her future husband:
  • "My chief interest was the physical situation and the surgical potential,” Jones says. “Was the patient healthy and able to withstand the operation?—all that kind of stuff. The case was pretty well worked up before I ever got involved.” For Jones, the surgery on Brenda Reimer was like the routine castrations he had been performing on hermaphrodite babies over the previous twelve years—and apparently Johns Hopkins Hospital viewed the operation the same way. Officials of the hospital have declined all comment on the case, but a Johns Hopkins public relations person, JoAnne Rodgers, told me in the winter of 1998, “In all surgeries that were considered, in the sixties, to be experimental, there were protocols in place to have those approved by appropriate committees and boards.” Dr. Jones cannot recall that the hospital convened any special committee or board in the case of Bruce Reimer’s historic conversion to girlhood."
John Money's Gender Identity experiment on Brenda Reimer went far beyond the pages of medical journals and landed into the living rooms of the general public via TV interviews and news articles. Even Time magazine boasted that John Money PROVED brains are mutable and unsexed at birth. Women's Liberation/Radical Feminists quickly held up Money's Gender Identity experiment as proof that feminism could change the future of male/female behaviour if children were simply reached at a young enough age. Boys could be taught to be a kinder gentler sex and girls could be taught to excel in math and science, together bringing a balance, harmony and equality long lacking in humankind. Or could they?

In lieu of the length of this post, I'm presenting it in two parts, stay tuned for part two later this week.


Saturday, June 18, 2016

The Anatomy of a Trans Trender (as told by pictures and hashtags)

A brief glimpse into the transition of a young lesbian by route of her STRAIGHTBIAN girlfriend and the pro transgender anti lesbian media:

From youthful, fresh faced, even beautiful; to haggard, grey skinned, tired and far too old for her years. From lesbian to pansexual. Within the span of a few years of testosterone poisoning, this young lesbian's life has been ruined, erased and replaced with a ghost. While the psychiatric community, medical community, Obama Admin and liberals are breaking their arms patting their own backs, (OUR) the Lesbian Community is disappearing before our eyes.


Thursday, June 9, 2016

Trans Trending-Who is Transitioning-Pop Psychology in the 21st Century

Jay Age 20

Rian Age 15

DD Age 22

Caden Age 19

Sean Age 22

Tate Age 20

Ari Age 15

Jamie Age 15

Eli Age 24

The 1980's and early 90's flooded bookstores nationwide with every kind of self help book imaginable along with new agey therapies sprouting up in equal measure. There was a tidal wave of self acceptance, the REAL you is the BEST you and an all around I'm Ok You're Ok attitude. During this time one would be hard pressed to swing a dead cat without hitting at least one person that wasnt in therapy, trying to find a therapist or poised with a self help book in hand.

This fertile ground of it's not what you're eating it's what's eating you sowed the seeds for the distorted Rousseauan I think therefore I am-ness that has become the theme for the transgender revolution by both Drs and patients alike. This transgender theme doubles almost as an ideology itself, combining self help pathology coupled with consumerism on steroids! Be the REAL you, but by golly only if you completely change your body, your brain, your personality, even your insides!

How can anyone be the REAL them by changing the them that IS the real them to begin with??? The answer is, they cant!

When psychologists are peddling a pathological movement whose WHOLE premise for being the REAL you, your TRUE self is by advocating medically changing everything about yourself, who are the REAL crazies???


Tuesday, June 7, 2016

Sheila Jeffreys-Where STRAIGHTBIAN and Butch/Femme Collide

This STRAIGHTBIAN ditty was tweeted by RadFem Collective earlier today promoting a diatribe on Butch/Femme by Sheila Jeffreys.
From this we can gather retired academic STRAIGHTBIAN Sheila Jeffreys has clearly not retired from flapping her gums about that which she detests but knows not, i.e. lesbians. Particularly Butch/Femme lesbians whom she has vehemently despised, attacked and inaccurately attributes to every kind of dyke EXCEPT  Butch/Femme! Jeffreys is still (40 yrs later) declaring Butch/Femme as faux/deviant lesbian relationships that are fraught with feminist issues because they draw (mimic) directly from hetero-patriarchal (sexual) power structures that occupy male/female relationships. For a lesbian, Jeffreys seems to focus a good deal on heterosexual SEX SEX SEX relationships and the issues they spawn. Easily interpreted to mean, according to Jeffreys (RadFems), feminism can and will never function inside heterosexuality/heterosexual relationships or lesbian relationships SHE deems STRAIGHT! 

In Jeffreys life long obsession with Butch/Femme, she has never once differentiated Butch from any variety of dyke and continues today lumping all together wherever/whenever it suits her STRAIGHTBIAN agenda. Jeffreys imposes similar ignorance where Femme is concerned, lumping STRAIGHTBIAN queer-femme, high-femme right in with Femmes themselves, with no seeming rhyme or reason. STRAIGHT privilege abounds, STRAIGHTBIAN Jeffreys doesnt have to bother with particulars where minority lesbians are concerned, our LEGITIMATE lesbianism unhinges STRAIGHTBIAN club rhetoric. 

Jeffreys, not surprisingly, is a proponent/advocate of gender non essentialism, used both as a vehicle to place her squarely in the Lesbian camp as well as blow the gender door off its hinges inviting transgenderism STRAIGHT into the Gay and Lesbian community where it dominates today. More on this in a future post. 

Sheila Jeffreys has made it her life's career to unhinge Lesbian from Biology (In my book, Anticlimax, I suggested a different tactic, the deliberate construction of ‘homosexual desire’. I defined ‘homosexual desire’ as eroticised sameness of power whether expressed within lesbian, gay or heterosexual relationships) and where she has been unable to do so, she muddies and uglies Lesbian 
You read that right, Jeffreys declares Lesbian a fucking "theory"! Without Lesbian being removed from the biology that which it stands, STRAIGHTBIANS like Jeffreys are, well, just plain STRAIGHT. 

My wife and I are the ONLY kind of lesbians that can and do exist (biological) lesbians. Specifically,  she is a Femme lesbian and I a Butch lesbian, two lesbian females BEING lesbian females 24/7. We have together reached an age and a disgust level where neither of us can stomach another mouthful of the STRAIGHTBIAN bile DICKtating our lives misread/misinterpreted/misunderstood or outright slandered back to us or our fellow lesbians! The jig is up and the gloves are on the mat.

STRAIGHTBIANS/RadFems like Jeffreys brought the transgender plague into our community just as assuredly Reagan injected HIV into the gay community in the 80's. Thanks to Jeffreys and her RadFem ilk insecure dykes in the 90's jumped into the transgender flames hoping to warm themselves, only to be burned alive later on. Thanks to Jeffreys and her RadFem ilk, dyke after dyke after fucking dyke was coddled/cuddled/pushed and pressured into transition from STRAIGHTBIAN LEZBOPHOBIA. Thanks to Jeffreys and her RadFem ilk, gay and lesbians as young as 2 yrs old are now being flagged as transgender. Thanks to Jeffreys and her RadFem ilk, young lesbian teens have and are transitioning at INSANE numbers, many already suffering from secondary testosterone poisoning while others commit suicide as transition ruins their young lives.Who can lesbian youth turn to for guidance when all the so called lesbian experts are fucking STRAIGHT! 

Butch/Femme are BIOLOGICAL states of the rarest kind of LESBIAN Sheila, but that rarity doesnt remove homosexuality from our very cores, nor any other kind of dykes. Except YOUR kind Sheila, the STRAIGHTBIAN kind, which lets face it Sheila-just isnt kinda straight, but IS definitively straight


Sunday, June 5, 2016

Doing Woman Different-Wendy O Williams

There are many reasons to abhor normal-an innate sense of being different, its tediousness, its cookie cutter madness, its shear boredom and its prison with no visible bars. But by far one of the worst aspects of normal is its ability to normalize child sexual abuse through the guise of the nuclear family. For some female survivors of child sexual abuse the only way to live a normal life after the abuse is to live as unnormal as possible. This was the case for Wendy O Williams who left home at age sixteen because she could no longer endure the brutality of her normal family.
Wendy Orlean Williams was born May 28, 1949 in upstate New York. Outside what appeared to be a general middle class background, specific details of Wendy's home life are unknown. But judging from her vehemence against normal and her highly charged and displayed sexuality and its focus,  the likelihood that Wendy hadnt suffered sexual abuse at the hands of someone close her (her father?) are slim to none. Sadly Wendy showed classic signs of childhood sexual abuse, beginning abruptly with leaving home in the middle of her 10th grade year.

Wendy drifted (hitchhiked) around the country selling homemade crafts and whatnots, and briefly drifted around Europe doing the same but eventually found herself back in the states in NYC in the mid 70's. After bouncing around from doing live sex theater, soft porn and a stink on a pornofied game show, Wendy was recruited into the punk rock band the Plasmatics. Wendy's concert performances consisted of her chainsawing televisions and other consumeristic appliances in coloured mohawks, black taped nipples and occasionally simulating masturbation scenes. Performances that not only garnered attention and criticism but jail time.

In the mid 80's Wendy embarked on a solo career, including acting in the now cult classic film Reform School Girls. By the early 90's Wendy was ready for retirement and moved to Connecticut with her long term boyfriend. Regardless of how many TVs, toasters or Cadillac's Wendy hacked up and demolished, she could never get at the IDEA of normal behind blind consumerism and the uselessness of things over nature, over life that dazzled and mesmerized normal people. She could also never saw out or saw off the normal (child sexual abuse) that haunted her or the centuries of other females whose lives were challenged, harmed or ruined by normal.

In 1993, Wendy made a serious attempt to surgically remove normal from her life/body by hammering a knife into her chest. When the knife caught on her sternum she panicked, changed her mind and contacted her b/f to get her to a hospital. In 1997 Wendy again tried to die, this time unsuccessfully overdosing. Despite her efforts to exploit, excise and exercise her family's normal from her life, despite her natural food activism and commitment to wildlife, a year later in 1998 Wendy left a note and gifts to the living, walked out into nearby woods and shot herself.

Wendy O Williams did woman different-she went beyond internalizing familial sexual abuse, to externalizing how NORMAL and pervasive the sexual abuse of girls and women are. Wendy challenged her audience to contemplate why the rape and murder of females is normal in our society, but chainsawing the instruments fueling/disguising rape and murder is abnormal. Much of Wendy's life was noisy. If you dont make noise how else is anyone going to hear you. Wendy O Williams didnt blow her brains out alone in the woods so that no one would hear, she did it to finally make a loud enough BANG so that her voice could finally be heard.

I hear you Wendy, LOUD and CLEAR.


Thursday, June 2, 2016

EVERY HOMOSEXUAL WAS A HOMOSEXUAL CHILD (NOT a gender non conforming child)

There are two distinct Gender Non Conforming camps-Camp A who wants to transition children defined as GNC and Camp B who press a transgender wait and see policy toward children labeled GNC. BOTH camps agree some children are Gender Non Conforming. Both camp's position harm children, particularly gay and lesbian children whom are mostly likely to be branded with the GNC label. Both camps promote the ignorance that homosexuality doesnt exist in children. Both camps fails to distinguish between the IDEA (theory) of transgenderism (in children) and the REALITY of homosexuality (in children). But the greatest injurious insult that both camps hold is that there is a correct way to do male and female! Both camps agree that obvious faggy boys and obvious dykey girls are Gender Non Conforming i.e. ABNORMAL! Both camps also use GNC (gay and lesbian children) to further their own warped agendas!

Let me state this flat out THERE IS NO RIGHT OR WRONG TO BE MALE OR FEMALE!  

There are no wrong clothes to wear, no wrong toys to play with, no wrong mannerisms to possess, no wrong way to walk/talk and no wrong playmates to have. Bear in mind, nearly ALL from both camps are heterosexual themselves! Using majority numbers not merely to rule, but as a measuring stick for what and who is NORMAL! Under that broad/wide and expansive umbrella no gay or lesbian child (or adult) will or can ever qualify as normal! Even if a gay or lesbian child manages to slip through the cracks of the GNC net, there is another GNC back up net to catch them as teenagers if they dare to come out or worse are caught being homosexuals with other homosexuals! The back up GNC net can and does extend into adulthood. Because the mere act of falling in love or lusting after someone of the same sex does not conform with NORMAL (heterosexual) IDEAS of gender!

Gay and lesbian children who conform to typical homosexual behaviour as small children/middle children and teens are NORMAL! NORMAL HOMOSEXUAL CHILDREN! I realize transgender agendist may have stolen gay and lesbian narratives but that doesnt mean it is too late to take our homosexual narratives back from greedy hands. It also does not mean WE (HOMOSEXUAL adults) suddenly became homosexual when we reached a certain age or passed a homosexual driving test!


WE know OUR homosexual feelings as children and it is up to US to protect homosexual children today who are being either transitioned or fucking erased via the Gender Non Conforming label/consequences!

A dyke child who conforms to being a dyke child IS NORMAL! 

A faggot child who conforms to being a faggot child IS NORMAL! 
Gender Non Conforming is an insult to homosexuals (children and adult)! WE ARE NORMAL! What we are NOT is heterosexual!


Monday, May 30, 2016

STRAIGHTBIAN Privilege-Heterocentricity & Dyke Vulnerability

In a recent post my wife elaborated and simplified further in the ongoing problematics with STRAIGHTBIANS co-opting/deceiving lesbians/lesbian spaces/lesbian sexuality, including determining/disseminating INCORRECT ideas held of lesbians by the general public and lesbians themselves! Writing off the important points made by my wife in her post, I'm going to continue in that vein, focusing on STRAIGHTBIAN privilege, heterocentricity, dyke vulnerability/dyke shame and how when coupled, all combust into dykes transitioning.
 STRAIGHTBIAN privilege functions for straight women in the lesbian arena similarly to how male privilege functions  for men everywhere. The world/society being a (relative) normal place for STRAIGHTBIANS from birth, gives STRAIGHTBIANS several legs up over growing disadvantaged dykes. Dyke children have no language for their feelings/crushes and all around ways of being dyke girls. Outside of our own bodies, dykes rarely exist. And as children, we perceive ourselves through what we see around us, beginning with our families, then extending through tv/films/sports/toys/clothes/other children/commercials/magazine covers/comic books/fairy tales/billboards etc.

And what baby dykes see is HETEROCENTRICITY magnified to the Nth degree! What baby dykes do not see is ourselves! Even today, media visible dykes like Ellen are so watered down, their sexuality (despite being married) is covered with so much dirt, they as lesbians seem dead to us. Lesbians continue to exist only in the public eye IF 1) the IDEA of lesbian sex is controlled/regulated by men/for men or 2) actual lesbians are devoid of sex in order to make them palatable for John Q public! And this is the world lesbians are born into, a world where despite the world wide web's global accessibility to just about EVERYTHING-dyke visibility and dyke actuality remain fictive, defined by heterocentricity via STRAIGHTBIAN interpretations or diaphanous.

Baby dykes of all varieties are barraged by the heterocentric romance of boy/girl beginning at home, carried on into school fairy tales where a baby dykes only option in their imagined futures is to put themselves in the boy position of boy/girl fictions. Growing dykes dont dream of a handsome prince rescuing them from some evil dragon, dykes dream of slaying the dragon themselves! As dyke youths begin developing girl crushes, they watch as each crush one by one fades into the boyOsphere. In the land of boy/girl, it is the boy who always gets the girl, not the dyke. Dykes often find themselves in the best friend position with girls. Girls will tell their dyke bestie what boy she likes, what he said to her at the school dance or in the school hall before 5th period. She will also drop dyke bestie like a bad habit when when dreamboat boy requires her attention. She will then expect bestie dyke to drop everything when she needs a shoulder to cry on after boy after boy dumps her. Dykes growing up wind up as boy stand ins for girls when boys arent available. Desperate lonely dyke youths will be that stand in just to smell a hint of romance.

The boy stand in scenario sets dykes up to be taken advantaged of later on by STRAIGHTBIANS. For the variety of reasons straight women CHOOSE to date dykes, dykes having been passed over again and again by straight girls/women for males, so that when a STRAIGHTBIAN shows dyke interest, dykes cant help but revert back to that hurt baby dyke standing alone at the school dance watching her crush dance and snuggle with a boy. This is her chance to FINALLY get the girl all the boys wanted! A want so strong that dykes believe STRAIGHTBIAN tales of "I never knew I was a lesbian till you"! And it becomes apparent soon enough in a STRAIGHTBIAN/Dyke relationship that STRAIGHTBIANS know nothing about lesbianism/lesbian culture or lesbian desire.

Some STRAIGHTBIANS will know enough to skirt making love to a dyke partner by pulling the Stone Femme card or be shocked when a dyke wants a reciprocal relationship in bed and out-"you mean you're not a STONE butch"? STRAIGHTBIANS functioning through heterocentricity will cause female shame or increase existing female shame by using male vernacular to flirt with dyke partners such has calling them handsome or masculine. Many will even tell dykes that they seem more like a man to them. Some even asking did they ever think they might REALLY be a man trapped in a woman's body. STRAIGHTBIANS will tell dykes they walk like men, talk like men, think like men, act like men.

Some STRAIGHTBIANS may innocently feel aligning dykes with men is a compliment, others flat out use male compliments to undermine dyke confidence. Either way, when STRAIGHTBIANS  cannot bother to familiarize themselves with lesbian culture/history when getting involve with dykes and trudging into a relationship with a dyke filtered through narrow heterocentricity, dykes are harmed in the process. In the past that harm could simply mean:
  • Dyke falls in love with a STRAIGHTBIAN and at some point said STRAIGHTBIAN dumps dyke for a man.  
  • STRAIGHTBIAN continues to sleep with men while calling herself a lesbian and sleeping with dykes, whereby dykes wind up contracting a heterocentric venereal disease. 
  • STRAIGHTBIAN using male jargon to flirt with dyke, shames dyke for not being a man. 
  • Dykes used by STRAIGHTBIANS for financial gain till a bankroll with a penis comes along.
  • STRAIGHTBIANS wasting dyke time/dyke lives that dykes can NEVER get back. 
But in the present time, the past harm STRAIGHTBIANS caused dykes is the least of it. In the last decade or so, STRAIGHTBIANS taking a man break for a temporary dyke diet has literally led dykes in droves STRAIGHT into transgender transition!
  • Some vulnerable dykes transition for fear of losing their STRAIGHTBIAN for a man.
  • Some vulnerable dykes transition because STRAIGHTBIANS wanting to use male names/pronouns (in bed and out) with them gave the distinct impression said STRAIGHTBIAN really wants a man. And vulnerable dykes will try to fit that bill.
  • Some vulnerable dyke's female shame is so great, STRAIGHTBIANS suggesting said dyke looks/acts/feels like a man to them, pushes dykes into transition.
  • Some vulnerable dykes transition because their STRAIGHTBIAN says it would make their relationship better and more authentic/accepted.
  • Some vulnerable dykes transition trying the be the man their STRAIGHTBIAN says she needs them to be for her!
  • Some vulnerable dykes transition for their STRAIGHTBIAN because their STRAIGHTBIAN is uncomfortable in a "lesbian relationship".
STRAIGHTBIANS filter lesbianism through a heterocentric lens, which regardless of how a STRAIGHTBIAN dating a dyke came about, comes with a high degree of privilege that no dyke will EVER enjoy. Dykes learn as children that we must maneuver through life if we are to survive, thrive and be happy. STRAIGHTBIANS for which heterocentricity is normal, never have to contemplate the daily issues dykes negotiate once their foot steps outside the comfort of their own door.

STRAIGHTBIANS do not have to mind shift/switch when watching tv or movies or reading stories. STRAIGHTBIANS exist everywhere they look. In no corner of the earth do STRAIGHTBIANS not find themselves staring back into their own eyes. Dykes have no such privilege, and as a result dykes greedily consume anything resembling dyke regardless of the awful taste it leaves in the mouth. When you rarely have the pleasure of food, you become so hungry that you will eat shit if its put in from of you. Unfortunately long after digestion, the smell lingers on.