Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 1

Due to the vast and often contradictory/convoluted information we have had to wade neck-deep through, this series of posts, as of right now, has no definitive end.

To regular readers of this blog: While these posts may seem to be a bit off the beaten path, it will quickly become apparent that this topic is actually very much in line with everything this blog has long stood for.

That being said, let me briefly explain how Mrs Dirt and I have become embroiled in the missing persons case of Kristin Snyder.

Mrs Dirt noticed a series of various attention-grabbing headlines regarding a purported "sex cult". As the headlines continued, and more information became available, we were both perplexed at how the #MeToo/post #MeToo movement has completely robbed women of all responsibility/agency, and nowhere was that more apparent than the NXIVM debacle.

Fast forward and many conversations between us later, a documentary called The Lost Women of NXIVM aired on the Discovery ID channel in December 2019. It follows "investigative journalist" conspiracy theorist Frank Parlato as he insinuates that Keith Raniere, the fallen leader of NXIVM, had a role in the deaths of 4 women.

The obvious problem with this documentary is simple: Parlato's paranoid pontifications and his questionable "witnesses" fail to meet even the barest bones of "proof", and his boneheaded theories are more full of holes than Swiss cheese that has been blasted with a shotgun. Since one of these so-called "lost women" examined slandered was Kristin Snyder, a lesbian Homosexual female, our interest was immediately piqued. That, and the fact that Mrs Dirt, who at that time was heavily involved with missing persons cases, had no recollection of Kristin Snyder's case  (she naturally took note of cases involving Homosexual persons). Obvious also by the program's end was that the ID producers of this docu-salacious/sensationalism-mentary hurried this project to the point of junior high editing and grade school interviewing, accompanied by a complete disregard to contradictions so copious that they occurred more often than they did NOT occur! 

So, let's take an initial look at the case of one of the 4 "lost women": Kristin Snyder.
What is known: Kristin Snyder, by all accounts, was reported to be a happy, successful, ambitious 35-year-old who ran her own environmental consulting business, volunteered for the Nordic Ski Patrol, and enjoyed many outdoors sports/activities. She had attained a master's degree in ecology, and had published academic papers in her specialized field. She was living in Anchorage, Alaska at the time of her disappearance with her partner, Heidi Clifford, with whom she was joined in a civil partnership in Vermont in September of 2001.

According to the Alaska State Troopers police report, dated February 7, 2003, Anchorage Police Department reported to the Alaska State Troopers that there was a missing persons report on Kristin Snyder, and that she had been reported to be possibly "suicidal" and that there was "information that she might be in Seward "(Alaska).

Kristin's car, a 1999 black Toyota Tacoma truck, was found on February 8, 2003 in Lowell Point near Miller's Landing at Resurrection Bay in Seward, Alaska. An extensive official search was conducted around the Seward area, but no sign of Kristin Snyder has ever been found. According to a later report, a bizarre 2-part note was found in her truck. A key was found in the door of her vehicle.

Kristin Snyder was presumed by everyone at that time to have committed suicide, and a presumptive death certificate was applied for in January 2004 and granted in July 2004, although she is still officially classified as missing.

That's it. That is all that is truly known. So little and so convoluted, in fact, after viewing Lost Women, both of us initially suspected Kristin Snyder was not real! We took to Ancestry to find out she very much was real!

The rest of the purported evidence hearsay presented by Parlato (and many others) since her disappearance is dubious at best -- an odd combination of revenge-motivated slander, contradictions, confusion, misdirection, conflicting reports, rank speculation, conspiracy theories, wishful thinking, willful ignorance, and even outright lies.

Depending on who is telling the story and what the agenda-du-jour is, the various stories range from laughable to ludicrous and back again.

Somewhere between Anchorage and Albany, between Heidi and Frank, between Catholicism and sex cults, between facts and fiction, between reality and fantasy, who Kristin Snyder really is/was has been completely lost -- obliterated by self-preservation, ennui, vivid imaginations, twisted agendas, and mind-blowing exploitation.

Every crime analysis begins with victimology. Victimology gives a baseline (like a lie detector) on the victim that can thereafter be used to measure truths and lies about the victim. The same process should have been carried out in Kristin's case and needs to be done now. Who was she? What were her habits? What did she like? What did she hate? What motivated her? What frightened her? What made her laugh? What were her hopes, her plans, her dreams, her morals, her ethics? 

We don't know. Very little is known about the actual Kristin Snyder -- the real human being behind the crude cartoon caricatures alleged in the docu-nonsense, by Kristin's bent-kneed, mouth-drooling, wafer-warring kin, and by anyone/s with a grudge against Keith Raniere/NXIVM, perhaps even including the woman she said "I do" to.

While we may not know who Kristin Snyder was, we do KNOW who she was NOT. Based on documented reports, including personal exchanges we have had with some who knew her personally and professionally, Kristin was a stable, happy, successful person. Through our growing body of research and ongoing inquiries, it is clear that Kristin was NOT the STRAIGHTBIAN, weak, psychotic, cheating, lying, gullible, foolish, pregnant, purple-slippered sycophant that she is currently being portrayed as. 

But before we get into the actual missing persons case of Kristin Snyder, the next series of posts will fully and completely dismantle ID channel's mockumentary The Lost Women of NXIVM. We will systematically address each individual speaking about Kristin, each contradiction, each implausibility, each individual's agenda, and each individual's honesty, integrity, and reliability. When we are through with this series of posts, we will have also laid to rest YEARS of agenda-based lies on Kristin Snyder that reach far outside Lost Women.

In the meantime, if anyone has any information or would like to join myself, Mrs Dirt and our small but growing network invested in seeking truth and justice for Kristin Snyder, please email us at Justice4Kristin@mail.com

Until next time...

Women's Liberation Front-WoLF Goes Rabid

Let me begin this post by stating full stop, this blog's focus has always in one way or another been focused on Homosexual females, this post is no different. And while this post might not appear to be centered on Homo females, as Tilly from Miranda says "Bear with"!

As my wife and I have been busy with the recent holidays and another project (that yes is Homo female focused) it might seem like we are not aware of what has BEEN going on in areas online/offline that affect us, we are btw. We have both chosen to keep out of internet nonsense unless we feel it is worth our precious time. For me, this is such a time.

I have had multiple readers, including some Radical Feminists asking me to write something on the Homophobic Hate group WoLF. I have until now refrained because frankly, they were not really worth my time. After given a recent heads up on their latest Hate Speech filled "evening" scheduled in NY this Friday, specifically the Homophobes speaking at this engagement and another deplorable incident brought to my attention, I emphatically said YES, I will write something on WoLF and their Homophobic members/agenda.

The event in question is this:

I will largely focus on those speaking at this event and a few other WoLF hangers-on.

In the order from their website the speakers are as follows along with my comments on them:

Dominique Christina's claim to fame is slam poetry, of which she does well. She does not appear to have done any sort of work on gay, lesbian or transgender issues. I can see only one reason WoLF was interested in having her join their little band of enmity for this occasion.

Het privileged Homophobe Libby Emmons is so violently Homophobic one feels just skimming her writings like they have been queer bashed! A few quotes from Libs as an example:

I dont know if Libby is too busy being a mom/writer to do her research, but it is patently clear she knows little about how transgenderism was green lighted by Radical Feminism. Something WoLF states on their own website is their aim to "ultimately dismantle the gender-caste system". Umm Libby? WoLF? Congratulate yourselves, you are succeeding! Men are legally women all over the world thanks you and women like you! Also by Libs is this offensives garbage:
While Libs is being somewhat facetious, I have to ask WHY DID LIBBY CHOOSE TO FACETIOUSLY ADD THE "R" TO THE LGBTQIA and not to Heterosexuals? Could this possibly be why:
This is from the DSM I (1952). Clearly Libby Emmons believes fucking a robot is the equivalent to being a Homosexual ie pervert! Again Libby fails in her research department because there is a vast difference to being Homosexual (begins at conception ends at death) and a Heterosexual male banging a replica of a human. Thats right Libs, HETEROSEXUAL MALES ARE THE ONES FUCKING ROBOTS NOT US! Keep YOUR perverts in YOUR lane! Thank you very much!

Linda Bellos, like many who associate with WoLF is a hands-across-the-errr-cocksucker of the Homophobic Heritage Foundation who are known for such bullshit as this:
Heritage Foundation is a Hate group using scare tactics to frighten the general public and honey poured on their cocks to entice the gender crit ignorants such as WoLF. But I digress, a few quotes from an interview with Linda: 

In other words, Linda Bellos CHOSE to partner with women, she is NOT a biological Homosexual and as such, she does NOT have OUR particular interests and needs in any capacity in mind! Explains how she can hop on the Heritage Hog so easily! Like a few others in the UK, Linda got herself into a pickle when she verbally threatened to bash some male trans online:
 Funny Linda screams the old transwomen arent women slogan, yet she refers here to male trans as "bitches"...Hmmm. While it is its own nonsense, nevertheless this kind of behaviour is as unproductive as it is ridiculous.

Meghan Murphy is probably most known for the largest cry baby tantrum ever seen on social media when banned from Twitter for flagrantly not following Twitter's TOS.

Big tech giants, like anyone, anywhere are counting on you as a user to follow the rules/guidelines you agreed to when you signed up. It does not deserve my time or my donation! Along with her inability to follow basic social media guidelines, she will however use her own platform to slam Homosexuals:
These types of HOMOPHOBES are the fucking worst! Its a big fat backhanded (oh I'm sure homos marrying is ok, getting hitched might even be fun-BUT), yeah, fuck you too Meghan Murphy! Never in my life did I even think I would get married. Not because I didnt want to, but because I never believed for a moment it would ever be humanly possible! Fortunately that possibility came shortly after the right person came into my life and until that moment that we both said our "I do's" did I realise just how much Homosexuals have been denied, because trust me when I say, being married DOES make a difference and with the right person it is a beautiful thing! Marriage is not about fun or sexism, it is about love with legal protections from bigots like the Meghan Murphy's of the world!

  • Natasha Chart is the board chair of the Women’s Liberation Front.
Natasha Chart has this to say about herself:
Basically Natasha finds men and women both attractive but men make more money so sorry ladies Nat is strictly about about who can best finance her. Given that we shouldnt be surprised by this:
Yes, you read that correctly. Natasha Chart is another patron of the Homophobic Heritage Hog! And since she is a board chair for WoLF we can see why WoLF is drowning in a sick seabed of Homophobia!

Posie Parker has long been known to be a virulent racist and Homophobe, my wife and I can both personally attest to her Homophobia. PP (wife and mother-careful PP Meghan doesnt approve!) uses the idea of motherhood to extend her motherly (lol) instincts to children being transitioned. And like most Gender Crits once someone has reached adulthood:
Apparently PP does not think motherhood should extend to trans females regardless of point in transition. This from a woman who spends more time telling other women how to be mothers than being a mother herself. Now to address a speck of the rampant Homophobia that PP routinely spews:
The type of Homophobic articles Posie Parker enjoyed sharing on her Facebook before her account was rightfully suspended.
I pray her children are not Homosexuals. Apparently PP is too ignorant to know us adult Homosexuals were once child Homosexuals!
Homosexuality according to Posie Parker and I quote is "SHIT"! As Posie was cautioned over her nutfuckery in the UK, she came over the the good old USofA to peddle her hate by harassing a male trans at work of all places:

I suspect thats the reason Bellos and Parker are headlining this little shindig, too fucking cowardly to speak openly in England!

The problem with self interest groups like WoLF is that their Homophobia is not contained to their little group, it spreads online like contagion. And like contagion it is usually the weak who are most at risk, in this case mentally ill women believing a RadFem group is their personal lord-ess and savior. The depths of their depravity truly knows no bounds, but more on that later. First I digress...

Before I continue, let me say, until right here, right now, you will not find a single mention of Cathy Brennan anywhere on this blog.

It is no shock or surprise that I am not a fan nor friend of Cathy Brennan's. It is probably no shock or surprise that some years ago over something I wrote here Cathy Brennan sent me a cease and desist letter. What is a shock and surprise is that I am here to call out a few of the mentally disturbed WoLFers for their infuckingsane harassment of Brennan simply because she has called out the HOMOPHOBIA of WoLF/WoLF members and other gender crits. This from one such mentally disturbed RadFem:
Rather than bother to investigate Kip aka Carol's claim because Brennan is on a shit list, Carol's gaslighting easily takes flame:

This was some of the initial harassment, it later gets much worse:
And this contagion spread:

Hating Cathy Brennan is what is bringing together RadFems and Male Trans? And the stupidity award meme goes to Jen Ziggen-congrats hun you earned it!

These deplorable women would rather harass someone fighting for THEIR rights rightfully, all because Brennan chose not to hop on the we-hate-homos Heritage Hog. And harass her literally right after her father died, which in and of itself is horrible and difficult, but when a death is on or near our most precious holidays, holidays that hold some of our most treasured memories, it is an extra burden, one to be felt acutely whenever that holiday arrives for the rest of their life.

And while there are always the odd rogue hangers-on/leaches, it is up to the group to rein those folks in or release them altogether. But there was none of that, not even after the flat out psycho's making fun of Brennan's father dying or wishing Brennan had died instead of M. Berns! My wife being the Aspergerie gal that she is decided she was going to note how many friends these two particular nut fucks lost, a whopping ZERO. See this is what I was talking about with contagion, it isnt just limited to the group but to everything and everyone they touch!

WoLF and any of its associates or Gender Crit kooks are not invested in saving "trans kids", they, like the Heritage Foundation are invested in slowing down Gay and Lesbian progress, halting Gay and Lesbian progress and reversing Gay and Lesbian progress UNDER the guise of anti-transgenderism! Transgenders are not transitioning themselves! Think about it!

But supporting right-wing hate groups, especially the BRITS who will not remotely be affected by how United States HATE legislation via HATE groups like WoLF/Heritage Foundation will affect Homosexuals, INCLUDING women who chose to partner with other women! Hello! I feel like I am watching a vicious rabid dog eat its own self and biting the hand of anyone trying to save it.

Women's Lib Front may pretend to be a WoLF in sheep's clothing, but I'm not your grandma nor red riding hood!


PS I dedicate this to Brits Posie and Linda

Did Radical Feminism Open the Door to Transitioning Children?

I have mentioned umpteen times on social media and written categorically here on the miscalculation/hapless strategy Radical Feminists place/d on Gender. Specifically on Radical Feminist's theorizing and then believing their theory that Gender (the not very well thought out idea, having no basis in reality (past or present), that collective man ie patriarchy, is responsible for the woes (however small or large) any and all Het women have regardless of how they ID) is the key to unlocking Het women's misery/weaknesses.

I have established how
  • RadFems/Feminists past (RadFem/Feminists today ignore these facts) jumped on the John Money-brains-have-no-sex bandwagon because they passively were handed an explanation-gender-(FROM MEN) on why men run the world and not them-SOCIALIZATION not Biology! They didnt care this info came from known MALE pedophiles whose "studies" consisted of boy twins being forced to act out Heterosexual male/female sex scenarios and pedophiles masturbating infants to see how long it took them to get an erection! Studies that as quick as they were published were soon found to have been fudged by said pedophiles. 
Radical Feminist desperation for internal/external power superseded any care for the children harmed (many mortally harmed) by the MEN proposing the brain is born out of experience (constructed) rather than sex (biology) idea. Radical Feminist history that made children expendable and propped up the MEN whose theories supported theirs has changed very little in the last forty years. In this post I'll show how Radical Feminism/Feminism past eerily coincides with Radical Feminists/Feminists now, to the cold, bitter and bloody detriment of children today.

Early Radical Feminists/Feminists single minded focus on Gender as a social construct built by Collective man/Patriarchy to keep Het women down blinded them to the man/men (John Money et al) they climbed into bed with. Gender Identity, the Frankensteinian failed experiment tested on children, ignored by Radical Feminists whose eyes never strayed from the perceived greater prize, simultaneously green lighted the proliferation of Het male trans. Before Radical Feminists had time to wipe their own collective ass, Het male trans were entering spaces once occupied ONLY by females. By the time the 1980's commenced, it finally dawned on a few Radical Feminists (Houston we might have a problem)!

The first and primary initiate used by Radical Feminists/Feminists to gate keep male trans was the woman-born-woman idea. Meaning unless you are BORN (biology) female, you cannot become a woman. Male trans being born male cannot, regardless of cross sexed hormone treatment/plastic surgeries become women and therefore should not be allowed into women only spaces. Bear in mind, all this occurring while Radical Feminists/Feminists were using Feminism to enter spaces held previously only by men. Hmmmm!

The women/womyn-born-women/womyn policy worked to a point; because Feminists/especially male proponents of Feminism created legal equalities for the SEXES in the public sphere, Radical Feminists/Feminists could not discriminate against male trans without fear of legal reprisals. However privately owned properties like Michfest for instance, the women/womyn-born-women/womyn policy could stand so long as public/corporate sponsorships werent involved. Unfortunately men being men, male trans continued unabated to gain entrance to Michfest and the like and men being men, challenged/changed existing laws with which to do so successfully.

While male trans were busy fighting for the legal right to be women, Radical Feminists/Feminists had to step back, take stock and figure out a new tactic to keep men at bay. I suspect their brainstorming went a  little like this:
While there has been no shortages of "transwomen arent women" incantations throughout social media in the last decade, this alone has done nothing to slow male trans down, in fact it has had the opposite effect. By women calling these males some form/any form of woman (transwoman/transwomen), especially treating male trans the way Het women routinely treat each other, such as the extreme criticism of how women look. For example, this from Radical Feminist/Feminist/Gender Crits women criticizing a male trans celebrity:
The point being by addressing male trans as some form of woman, by treating them the way women generally treat each other, via a bitchy bitchfestiness, many male trans feel like they are finally just one of the girls! So Radical Feminists/Feminists began using the idea of female lived experience. What would a 60 year old man who has transitioned really KNOW about what it is to be a woman? To be treated by your parents/relatives/school/church/society as a girl/woman. Male trans may take hormones and have surgeries to help them better appear woman-like, they do not have however the lived experience that women have growing up as girls/women. Here Radical Feminists/Feminists believed they had made the ultimate chess move! But instead of checkmate, they should have checked themselves before the wrecked themselves AND innocent children! But while busily patting themselves on the back in a win for sisterhood, men continued to do what men do.

For the Heterosexual females reading this post, let me give you a little tip about men; when they strongly believe in a cause, they will work their butts off doing whatever is needed EVEN if they themselves will not benefit from the potential success. If criteria for woman is based on physical appearance AND lived experience then by golly so be it! Enter changes to the DSM 5, enter trans children. Trans lobbies couched trans children like any dis/ease, early detection means a greater chance for survival. It also means Radical Feminists/Feminists cannot say someone like Jazz Jennings does not have the lived experience of being RAISED a girl.

In effort to close the door they fought so hard to open, Radical Feminists/Feminists hooked up with the Gender Criticals, a small number of bored mostly conservative Homophobic mothers/housewives criticizing how other women were/are raising their children. Gender Crits claim the health of children being transitioned is the heart of their cause. Obviously a bullshit claim because Gender Crits are okay with adult transition. Clearly the numerous negative health effects from transition, do not magically stop the moment someone turns 18!

The Radical Feminist/Feminist/Gender Crit ménage has been too busy arguing amongst themselves, fucking each other, fucking each other over, climbing in and out of bed with religious-conservative MEN, attacking adult male trans at their homes/workplaces/social media and least we forget making stickers, t-shirts and posters with their hubby's hard earned coin. And how many children has this sundry circle jerk successfully stopped from the trans grist? Exactly at this time? Lets count them: nil, nada, none, nothing, zero, zilch, diddly-squat, sod-all, a goose egg, not a sausage and lets not NOT forget to count Sweet FA! 

Social Media Feminism is like Tinder dating; the picture might look good, the profile read like a dream, but when you meet for the first date neither party can recognize the other from their profile fibs and neither bothered to fact check beyond the profile. Radical Feminists/Feminists saw Gender Crits opposition to trans children and said lets date! And Gender Crits saw Radical Feminists/Feminists history of anti trans and said YES!  

But lets face it, the reality is Radical Feminism consisting of damaged Het women with a misdirected hatred toward collective man while Gender Criticalists are comprised of mostly bored mothers whose children are past needing diapering and whose hubby's are busy with anything/anyone except them. One group cannot see past their pathological hatred and the other cannot bear to see period; some people should not be dating!

Radical (STRAIGHTBIAN/Lesbian allies) Feminists/Feminists couldnt be bothered to notice Gender Crits extreme Homphobia, nor did Gender Crits bother to look beyond Radical Feminists/Feminists anti trans history to see it was Radical Feminism itself via dismantling Gender that ushered in the Transgender Movement, including the later move to transition children. And now its morning and both are crying coyote ugly. But gnawing off your own arm to get the fuck away from each other isnt going to bring back a healthy childhood to children lost to transition anymore than its going to prevent another child OR adult from the mental and physical harm of transition

But regardless of the ongoing feminist catfights that always were and will be, Radical Feminism's Gender theories have proven to be a desecration to both women AND children.


I am Not Radical-I am Homosexual

In a recent video chat I did with CherryBlossomLife, one of her questions for me sprang from another Radical Feminist. The question basically was, how did I become “radical/radicalized“. I wanted to address the question a little more thoroughly in a post.

The very notion that Radical Feminists and other women see/view me as some sort of radical, goes to the swell of ongoing data that Mrs Dirt and I are slowly compiling concerning the mass biological differences between Heterosexual women and Homosexual females.

The question alone, accompanied by nothing else, is all the data required to know the person asking the question is a Heterosexual female AND know the questioner herself does not know Homosexual females. How you may ask can one ascertain that kind of info from just a simple question?

Lets look first at the term radical and its basic meaning:
Far beyond the norm. Whose norm? General society’s. Particularly general Heterosexual society! The society that Radical Feminists claim to “eschew” for varying reasons.

But what happens when you are born far beyond the norm? Can one be born a radical? Probably not. And I did not personally have a hand in choosing which of my father’s sperm cells were to meet a particular egg in waiting of my mother’s. Pure chance. Or timing, which is also chance.

But thats how Homosexuality works. Some might say its bad luck. Some might say it is great luck. And others might say it is a mistake. But no one says it is radical. Until or unless biology is removed from the equation.

  • Was it radical that I was a captain and/or first or second picked among all boys for sport games or games that required athletic abilities?
  • Was it radical that males were always/are my nearest peer group?
  • Was it radical that as a female I was treated by children/adults according to my behaviour rather than my sex?
  • Was it radical when on the girls track and field team in high school I refused to wear the (straight) girl’s uniform? And when confronted by the entire team and both coaches to wear the uniform, I walked away.
  • Was it radical that even in my 20’s I was still called to play (tackle) football with adult males? And was physically up to the challenge with every take down.

  • Is it radical that I communicate directly? Requiring few words to convey lofty messages.
  • Is it radical to be repeatedly believed to be or mistaken to be a man online for how I communicate?
  • Is it radical that when slandered by thousands I remain unflustered, do not have a melt down nor go into hysterics?
  • Is it radical to carve out the truth despite the constant rain of Radical Feminist storms trying to silence my every word?
  • Is it radical to simply say NO? To have self determination in the presence of men. To think for oneself. Act for oneself. To not lay blame on an imagined culprit like “patriarchy” for example, for one’s personal fears or failures. Basically, to own your own shit!
My norms, from my earliest memories until now have always seemed radical by Heterosexuals, particularly Het women. Because they judge my NORMAL behaviour based on their NORMAL behaviour, NOT on our different biology. My experiences as being perceived as some sort of radical or dissident by straight society is not unusual nor very different than it is for any biological homosexual female.

And it is through knowing ourselves, our innate biological differences from that of Heterosexuals that I and my wife CAN tell biology through a computer screen. Together we have spent a little over a century between us utterly surrounded by Heterosexuals and all things Heterosexual.

Believe me when I tell you, we know you better than you dare to know yourselves! 

So while these innate biological differences may make my normal Homo behaviour seem radical, I’m merely a normal biological Homosexual female being and behaving according to my biology. I am not special. I am simply NOT Heterosexual.


Straight Female Romance Sometimes Transcends Men, But NEVER Biology

Propagating the species, or the naked truth about the Heterosexual Human animal. Het females biologically are designed to want want want babies and Het males are biologically designed to want want want to have sex/orgasm, which until very recent times was the sole requirement in baby making. Seven and a half billion people strong one would think, like wisdom teeth, Humans would have evolutionalized past sex sex sex and babies babies babies. Unfortunately for our over populated planet Earth that is not the case.

Yes dear reader I can hear you thinking loudly Dirt, where the hell is this going? It goes to explain further core diametrical difference between STRAIGHTBIANS and us-Homo females. For example lets take a gander at a few recent issues of Het women's mags/site vs Lesbian ones. Het women's first:

What runs through/underlines the pages of these women's rags and those like them be it past, present and future is Hetero female's biological procreative drives and the many many lies/disguises used to fulfill them.

Now lets check out some current Lesbian article interests:
Lesbian i.e. STRAIGHTBIAN mag/rags/articles are merely Hetero women's mags/rags/articles with a large sticky sweet slice of mental disturbance/illness or just plain crazy on the side; but regardless, SEX is the dominant feature/interest. Meaning, you can take the Hetero woman out (drive out of via abuse/weakness/fear) of Heterosexual relationships, but you cannot take Hetero biology out of Het women.

If a Lesbian or Lesbian source's primary focus involves SEX, be it 
  • lesbian sex 
  • lesbian sex advice/manuals
  • lesbian sex toys
  • licking lesbian puss
  • lesbian dating
  • lesbian kissing
  • lesbian lusts
  • lesbian relationships
  • lesbian kink
  • lesbian asexuality
  • lesbians squatted compact in hand checking out their vagina's
  • lesbians masturbating
  • lesbian group sex
  • lesbian in vitro
  • lesbian sperm donors
  • lesbian pregnancy
  • lesbians having babies
  • lesbians and their children
  • lesbians baby showers
  • lesbians for penetration 
  • lesbians against penetration
  • lesbian HOT or NOT
  • lesbian burlesque
  • lesbian strippers
  • lesbian call girls
  • lesbians in the sex industry
  • lesbians against sex work
  • lesbians who still have sex with men
  • lesbian bed death 
  • lesbian shoes
  • lesbian clothes
  • lesbian make up
  • lesbians against make up
  • lesbians sticking Barbie dolls in their vagina's
  • abortion issues
  • prostitution/sex trafficking
  • rape
  • domestic abuse
You can be certain you are dealing with, or your reading source is a damaged Hetero female-NOT a Biological Homo Female (BHF). 

Nope, not a BLT (bacon/lettuce/tomato).

Not a BLH (bad lesbian haircut).

Not a VHS (video home system).

Not a UHF (ultra high frequency).

Thats right, BHF (biological homo female)!


Missing Person Kristin Snyder: Lost in a Sea of Myths Pt 1

Due to the vast and often contradictory/convoluted information we have had to wade neck-deep through, this series of posts, as of right n...